Belgian airspace down? Radar
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 2,766
Likes: 4
From: Here and there
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
From: Whereever I lay my hat
And this was posted at 14:00 CET:
"EBBU (Brussels)
The technical issue at Brussels Centre has been resolved so the zero-rate regulation has now been cancelled.
Several sectors are regulated at reduced rate in order for the centre to recover, but these regulations will be lifted as soon as possible.
NMOC Brussels"
"EBBU (Brussels)
The technical issue at Brussels Centre has been resolved so the zero-rate regulation has now been cancelled.
Several sectors are regulated at reduced rate in order for the centre to recover, but these regulations will be lifted as soon as possible.
NMOC Brussels"
de minimus non curat lex
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 1,510
Likes: 7
From: sunny troon
The days of Area Control operating a procedural service only are clearly a thing of the past, apart from Shanwick of course.
Hardly surprising given the demands on the domestic airspace.
Hardly surprising given the demands on the domestic airspace.
Joined: Jun 2013
Aviation Qualifications: ATCO
Posts: 1,528
Likes: 99
From: Róisín Dubh
Joined: Jan 2007
Aviation Qualifications: ATCO
Posts: 132
Likes: 0
From: Germany
The airspace is not designed for procedural control anymore and I donīt think anybody working a busy center in Central Europe is even remotely familiar with this kind of work. I admire the guys at Brussels working the eastern part of their airspace WITH radar...thereīs simply no point trying to do it without!
Joined: Jun 1999
Posts: 3,423
Likes: 1
From: world
Thanks all - seems that we diverted after the problems had been resolved but so be it. Only 2 hours late.
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
From: Athens
The airspace is not designed for procedural control anymore and I donīt think anybody working a busy center in Central Europe is even remotely familiar with this kind of work. I admire the guys at Brussels working the eastern part of their airspace WITH radar...thereīs simply no point trying to do it without!
The worst time was spring/summer 1991, during the Desert Storm USAF ops with all these B52s and tanker MACs refuelling F16s out of controlled airspace but crossing airways all the time... such were the good ol' days!
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 308
Likes: 6
From: etha
It's a good job we've got EASA and all that money being spent on SESAR in Europe (read this as NextGen if you're in the New World) because all the controllers who know anything about stopping aeroplanes from banging into each other while they've got their eyes shut will be retired soon!
The likelihood of any ATC system failing for any prolonged amount of time due to radar failure is so remote that teaching procedural just isn't worth the money. Just because a system fails it doesn't mean the radar goes.
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 308
Likes: 6
From: etha
London (my knowledge base) has two radar systems that apparently will not simultaneously fail. When they do, there is simply no way of employing procedural control in any sector I am aware of due to the complex route structure needed to move everyday traffic. The procedures are very simple to clear the skies and I just hope it never happens in earnest in the worst possible manner as I agree, they are borderline realistic. What would have happened if the Brussels tower was located directly above the terminal that was bombed?
22 years is how long London could still have Procedurally trained controllers for, unless they leave pre-pension age.
22 years is how long London could still have Procedurally trained controllers for, unless they leave pre-pension age.
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,655
Likes: 114
From: jersey
I agree. This sort of airspace & the prevailing traffic levels cannot be controlled procedurally. End of story !
Apart from anything else, how on earth can Controllers remain proficient Procedurally when the traffic loading is too high to allow them to operate Procedurally ? And, how can they "slip into Procedural Mode" when the Radar that, alone, is enabling them to separate & handle that heavy level of traffic suddenly presents them with what is a frightening emergency situation ?
Apart from anything else, how on earth can Controllers remain proficient Procedurally when the traffic loading is too high to allow them to operate Procedurally ? And, how can they "slip into Procedural Mode" when the Radar that, alone, is enabling them to separate & handle that heavy level of traffic suddenly presents them with what is a frightening emergency situation ?
More than just an ATCO
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 1,773
Likes: 1
From: Up someone's nose
It's more likely to be a failure in the data processing than of the radar. Fortunately it is possible to train for this, we used to do this on a monthly basis at night although I wouldn't have wanted to try it during peak periods.
Impossible to provide procedural separation anymore unless you impose draconian restrictions
Impossible to provide procedural separation anymore unless you impose draconian restrictions
