Wikiposts
Search
Questions If you are a professional pilot or your work involves professional aviation please use this forum for questions. Enthusiasts, please use the 'Spectators Balcony' forum.

Line up allowance

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 13th Dec 2014, 19:34
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Nz
Posts: 431
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 5 Posts
Line up allowance

Hi there,
Our Performance Manual tells us that the line up allowance for our 737-800 aircraft is 27m (ASDA) and 11m (TORA) . For an intersection departure, where does that 11m start from? Is it abeam the centreline of the taxiway ( where it enters the runway) even if the taxiway you are entering on is a high speed exit?
If someone could point me towards an ICAO doc that explains I would be grateful.
Cheers
73qanda is offline  
Old 13th Dec 2014, 22:52
  #2 (permalink)  
Sir George Cayley
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Don't know about ICAO but the UK CAA equivalent to Annex 14 has some useful drawings.

Google CAP168 Fig 3.14
 
Old 14th Dec 2014, 06:58
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: With Wonko, outside the Asylum.
Age: 56
Posts: 489
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Sir George has it; this was clarified recently in the UK's freely-published CAP.

Practically-speaking, following the taxiway centreline and then a sharp ninety-degree turn onto the runway centreline will give you the appropriate distance ahead. The crucial thing is not to follow the lead-off line as though it's a lead-on line. An exception would be doing so at a trot or canter, with the intention of a rolling takeoff, when a gentler turn at higher speed leaves you going faster at a particular point than you would have been had you turned on sharply at low speed. Doing so whilst spooling up may be VERY bad for some engines.

It's a complete mystery to me why ICAO doesn't make its safety standards available to people to read and learn from.

Last edited by TheiC; 14th Dec 2014 at 07:44.
TheiC is offline  
Old 14th Dec 2014, 19:48
  #4 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Nz
Posts: 431
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 5 Posts
Thanks a lot . I found the nice drawing in the cap which was a bit different to what I expected in that it used the downwind side of the taxiway as the reference for extending through to the runway centreline.
I am in NZ but imagine we have adopted ICAO for most things aviation.
Thanks again.
73qanda is offline  
Old 14th Dec 2014, 21:03
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Here and there
Posts: 3,104
Received 14 Likes on 11 Posts
Why would you use the upwind side? That robs you of tens of meters of TORA.
AerocatS2A is offline  
Old 14th Dec 2014, 23:27
  #6 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Nz
Posts: 431
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 5 Posts
Good question Aerocat. Who thought it would be a good idea to use the upwind side? Was the post deleted?
73qanda is offline  
Old 15th Dec 2014, 07:23
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Wor Yerm
Age: 68
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Unless you are performance limited, why not plan for an intersection departure and use the next longest one (or more) or reduce your TORA/TODA by 100m or so? Then you don't have to scrub your tyres and strain the gear graunching the aircraft around on the runway to squeeze every metre available. It also allows for a smooth, gentle line up and rolling takeoff.
Piltdown Man is offline  
Old 16th Dec 2014, 03:21
  #8 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Nz
Posts: 431
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 5 Posts
Unless you are performance limited, why not plan for an intersection departure and use the next longest one
I agree that that is a good idea in some circumstances, it's something I do if there will be no time penalty.
or reduce your TORA/TODA by 100m or so?
That isn't an option with the OPT we use.
Thanks for the input.
73qanda is offline  
Old 17th Dec 2014, 02:01
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Here and there
Posts: 3,104
Received 14 Likes on 11 Posts
Unless you are performance limited, why not plan for an intersection departure and use the next longest one (or more) or reduce your TORA/TODA by 100m or so? Then you don't have to scrub your tyres and strain the gear graunching the aircraft around on the runway to squeeze every metre available. It also allows for a smooth, gentle line up and rolling takeoff.
If you fly something with lack lustre performance you might not be able to get full flex from the next intersection down which makes management unhappy. So although you do have some performance margin you can't quantify it in terms of a reduction in TORA and have to treat it as though you have no performance margin at all.
AerocatS2A is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.