Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Ground & Other Ops Forums > Questions
Reload this Page >

B737-200 CRZ speeds

Wikiposts
Search
Questions If you are a professional pilot or your work involves professional aviation please use this forum for questions. Enthusiasts, please use the 'Spectators Balcony' forum.

B737-200 CRZ speeds

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 5th Jun 2014, 18:28
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: kent, england
Posts: 594
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
B737-200 CRZ speeds

Can anyone who flies the above tell me what typical cruise/descent speeds are please, with a typical perf figure in the FMS?
Thanks.
fokker1000 is offline  
Old 6th Jun 2014, 04:07
  #2 (permalink)  
Moderator
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: various places .....
Posts: 7,194
Received 106 Likes on 69 Posts
FMS ? You must have an upmarket bird.
john_tullamarine is offline  
Old 8th Jun 2014, 08:39
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: All at sea
Posts: 2,198
Received 168 Likes on 106 Posts
For reasonable economy - not that these things are economical - try M0.74 cruise and initial descent into 280 knots then the usual 250 below 10,000 ft.
Mach E Avelli is offline  
Old 10th Jun 2014, 09:00
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: My views - Not my employer!
Posts: 1,032
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Forget FMS - Try PDCS!
Cough is offline  
Old 10th Jun 2014, 10:09
  #5 (permalink)  
Per Ardua ad Astraeus
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 18,579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I did wonder too, Cough, but I cannot recall ANY 'Perf Figure' entries on the beast?

Incidentally, re Post #3, I would suggest M0.72 is more realistic?
BOAC is offline  
Old 10th Jun 2014, 11:49
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: My views - Not my employer!
Posts: 1,032
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
We used to put ZFW in it - It then gave max alt etc along with climb/descent speeds (and assumed temp for T/O too...)

The thing is, we all used to ignore the descent speed, figures below 250 were common on a light aircraft with a tailwind!

And yes, speeds around .72 to .73 were common.

Ed to add - It also did cruise speed (as above) with a headwind/tailwind feed from the nav box (if it worked! ;-) )

Last edited by Cough; 10th Jun 2014 at 15:03.
Cough is offline  
Old 11th Jun 2014, 22:54
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: All at sea
Posts: 2,198
Received 168 Likes on 106 Posts
With dash 17 engines it was reckoned by some to be marginally quicker than the later Classics. But the high fuel burn killed it.
Also as the airframes aged, a performance penalty of up to 8% had to be applied to individual machines. The boiler plate reinforcing work around the roof and windows provided some clue to just how much more fuel would be guzzled to achieve schedule.
For all that, a great aeroplane!
Mach E Avelli is offline  
Old 13th Jun 2014, 22:42
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: nowhere
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Around Mach .73 but have seen other companies flying a bit faster.
JammedStab is offline  
Old 13th Jun 2014, 23:08
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: glendale
Posts: 819
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I found max cruise was limited by NOISE.

fuel burn is one thing, but the noise in the cockpit really makes it a pain.

Set max cruise power and see how fast you go. Best speeds are around FL280.
glendalegoon is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.