Wikiposts
Search
Questions If you are a professional pilot or your work involves professional aviation please use this forum for questions. Enthusiasts, please use the 'Spectators Balcony' forum.

BA A380

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 13th Oct 2013, 09:45
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Home
Posts: 1,021
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
BA A380

I spoke recently with a BA 380 Training Capt. During general conversation about this great aircraft he mentioned BA and the Training dept..would prefer only Airbus experienced pilots to convert, as Boeing pilots would find the conversion very difficult.
I believe the first two or three BA hulls will have only ex Airbus pilots, for faster training into service etc.
Many pilots have converted to the A320 for their Commands from Boeings and other airlines have ex 747 to A330 with no difficulty. The RAF are presently converting 2000hr. ex TriStar Capts to the A330.
Other then size, ( no jokes please) what's so difficult about flying the BA 380?
cessnapete is offline  
Old 13th Oct 2013, 09:54
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 506
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Not sure about that. One of the first 380 conversions was a 747 guy.
long final is offline  
Old 13th Oct 2013, 09:58
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: gashbag
Age: 53
Posts: 558
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It's the transition from being a pilot, to being a uniformed passenger that many struggle with.
PURPLE PITOT is offline  
Old 13th Oct 2013, 09:59
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: The Winchester
Posts: 6,559
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
I'm not sure it's down perceived "difficulty".

The company has a pool of both Airbus and Boeing pilots, so to speak. Having flown one breed and jumpseated many times on the other to my aged brain there certainly seem to be "cultural" differences. I think it was considered easier and cheaper from the company's POV to at least initially, do a shortish type change for current/former Airbus pilots rather than both a type and Boeing to Airbus change.

LF

Not sure about that. One of the first 380 conversions was a 747 guy.
Some of the very early trainers who converted had a mix of experience but certainly for the first few courses for the line guys and girls there was a requirement to be current or ex-Airbus. I belive in the near future even that gate will be removed and even run in the mill Boeing pilots can apply.

Last edited by wiggy; 13th Oct 2013 at 10:04.
wiggy is offline  
Old 13th Oct 2013, 13:00
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: EGGW
Posts: 2,112
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The main difference between the Boeing and the Airbus, is the use of two hands.
You can only fly the aircraft in the left seat using your left hand and the right seat with your right hand.
Boeing you would normally use both hands.
Mr @ Spotty M is offline  
Old 13th Oct 2013, 19:12
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: England
Posts: 1,077
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Boeing you would normally use both hands.
Yes, one hand for the yolk, the other hand for the throttles.
ZeBedie is offline  
Old 14th Oct 2013, 08:29
  #7 (permalink)  
Per Ardua ad Astraeus
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 18,579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
We must know! What do AB pilots do with the other hand.......................
BOAC is offline  
Old 14th Oct 2013, 20:10
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Wor Yerm
Age: 68
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If the article in the current edition if "The Log" is to believed, this aircraft is only for the MOST experienced pilots. Those without this experience won't be able cope. Also, because of the large number of cabin crew, "a clear lead has to be set" by the commander. ...and other such tosh! Or there again, you could take the Qantas F/O's line, another contributor to the same article, that this is just another big aircraft.

However, what I did get from the article was a "whiff of Walpole" therefore I'll not fly on one BA's in case I get the clown who wrote the article. The odds are not good enough.
Piltdown Man is offline  
Old 14th Oct 2013, 23:36
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: In the sky
Age: 31
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I suppose it would come down to the CCQ (Cross crew qualification) issue. Airbus pride themselves on pilots being able to advance through the airbus fleet quickly, and relatively cheaply also. Saves costs, which may be a factor.

I believe you can go from a 320 to a 380 in about 13 working days, or at least, that's the figure given by Airbus themselves.
Fly-Boi-1992 is offline  
Old 15th Oct 2013, 06:06
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: The Winchester
Posts: 6,559
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
PM

I think there's always been a feeling a could be an "ego fleet" but I'm not so sure it's going to turn out that way, and at least one or two of the very early/senior trainers are very grounded and popular blokes. There are also signs that as more pilots from a variety of backgrounds successfully bid to move onto the 380 in the very near future (i.e. in the next 6-18 months) there'll be a bit of dilution of any contrary elements, if such is needed.

Also, because of the large number of cabin crew, "a clear lead has to be set" by the commander. ..and other such "tosh"
Ah, interesting you picked up on that phrase. I'd suggest that given the context it's a fair comment that tells you far more about crew and interdepartmental politics at BA than it does about the personality of the author.

Last edited by wiggy; 15th Oct 2013 at 08:18. Reason: Removing contentious comment
wiggy is offline  
Old 15th Oct 2013, 15:13
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Wor Yerm
Age: 68
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Wiggy - I have to say that every BA pilot I've met to date has appeared to be very pleasant and I imagine, easy to work with. Many are my friends. And I've also met quite a few BA cabin crew over the years too and they appear to be a useful bunch as well. Quite why they need to be led is beyond me. My experience is that they'll do their job and tell you in a timely fashion what you need to know. But I do take your point about the politics. Oh, and the article contains several other howlers as well.
Piltdown Man is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.