Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Questions If you are a professional pilot or your work involves professional aviation please use this forum for questions. Enthusiasts, please use the 'Spectators Balcony' forum.

What is a VGSI?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 7th August 2013 | 08:51
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
Per Ardua ad Astraeus
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 18,575
Likes: 4
From: UK
What is a VGSI?

Prompted by the SFO thread, I need to ask whether the VGSI is just another (US) name for PAPI or whether in fact the two pieces of equipment are different in usage?
BOAC is offline  
Reply
Old 7th August 2013 | 09:09
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 169
Likes: 0
From: UK
Hi BOAC

I believe VGSI is the collective term for approach angle indicators and is not a synonym for PAPI/ VASI or any other type of individual indicator, but I stand by to be corrected.
kharmael is offline  
Reply
Old 7th August 2013 | 11:36
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
From: Asunción, Paraguay
What is a VGSI?

From Wikipedia, i hope this might help:
Visual Glide Slope Indicator or Visual Glideslope Indicator (VGSI) is a ground device that uses lights to assist a pilot in landing an airplane at an airport. The lights define a vertical approach path during the final approach to a runway and can help the pilot determine if the airplane is too high or too low for an optimum landing.

There are several different types of VGSI's:

Visual Approach Slope Indicator (VASI)
Precision Approach Path Indicator (PAPI)
Pulsating Visual Approach Slope Indicator (PVASI)
Three-color Visual Approach Slope Indicator (T-VASI)
Helicopter Approach Path Indicator (HAPI)
ldt_py is offline  
Reply
Old 9th August 2013 | 10:38
  #4 (permalink)  
Fleet Manager
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL
Posts: 7,442
Likes: 307
From: various places .....
Three-color Visual Approach Slope Indicator apparently is a local Eastern Bloc device .. things one learns on the net.

Generally, when one refers to T-VASIS, one is probably referring a T-system such as is described here.
john_tullamarine is offline  
Reply
Old 9th August 2013 | 15:41
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,682
Likes: 0
From: France - mostly
The angle of 2°52’ is internationally recognised as the optimum approach slope angle.
Perhaps that explains the angle of 2°51’ at SFO?
HazelNuts39 is offline  
Reply
Old 11th June 2015 | 23:55
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
From: Alaska
VGSI Deviation

Can you guys help me with this question?

While on a visual approach with a 3.2 PAPI, At what altitude will I cross the path at 1 mile, 2 miles and 3 miles if I stay on 2 reds/2white?

If I fly a bit lower, say 3 red/1 white? same question...

Any practical formula?

Thanks for your expertise!!

Greatly appreciated
Newflyer23 is offline  
Reply
Old 12th June 2015 | 08:12
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 1
Likes: 2
From: nowhere
Originally Posted by ldt_py

There are several different types of VGSI's:

Visual Approach Slope Indicator (VASI)
Precision Approach Path Indicator (PAPI)
Pulsating Visual Approach Slope Indicator (PVASI)
Three-color Visual Approach Slope Indicator (T-VASI)
Helicopter Approach Path Indicator (HAPI)
Don't forget the alignment of elements non-lighting system. Have never actually encountered one yet.

https://books.google.ca/books?id=B3a...rcraft&f=false

And maybe even the paddles guy on an aircraft carrier.

Landing Signal Officer - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
JammedStab is offline  
Reply
Old 12th June 2015 | 13:37
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 287
Likes: 0
From: yankton, sd
the formula for a 3 degree glideslope is 300' per one nautical mile

3 miles, 900feet

it is actually closer to 316 feet per nautical mile.

steeper than 3 degrees would be a little more.

gouge, or little rules of thumb, would get too complicated for a pilot to quickly ,mentally calculate to the Nth degree. But I imagine you can. At TOO great a distance, earth curvature comes into play.

But 300' per nautical mile is close enough. That Asiana Air at KSFO could have used that formula. Or just looking at the visual approach plate you would see that you should be 1900' to 2000' over a convenient landmark


another convenient formula iis to multiply your groundspeed (or airspeed if you have nothing else) by 5 to determine the rate of descent to make good a 3 degree glideslope.

150 knots, your rate of descent should be 750 fpm

get it?
skyhighfallguy is offline  
Reply
Old 12th June 2015 | 18:37
  #9 (permalink)  
Guest
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 3,336
Likes: 0
From: On the Beach
HazelNuts:

Perhaps that explains the angle of 2°51’ at SFO?
All the PAPIs at SFO are 3.0 degrees:

http://aeronav.faa.gov/afd/30apr2015..._30APR2015.pdf
aterpster is offline  
Reply
Old 13th June 2015 | 13:54
  #10 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 3,246
Likes: 202
From: Here and there
Asiana just needed to recognize the autothrottle was not engaged. 5 x ground speed for rate of descent? Close, but you need to add a bit. If you use 750 rpm for 150 knots GS you will end up high on profile.
AerocatS2A is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.