Wikiposts
Search
Questions If you are a professional pilot or your work involves professional aviation please use this forum for questions. Enthusiasts, please use the 'Spectators Balcony' forum.

Safety Altitudes

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 17th Apr 2002, 18:43
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Walton - on - Thames
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Angry Safety Altitudes

Help

Does anybody have a reference for the calculation of safety altitude? Both terminal area and en-route.
Startri is offline  
Old 17th Apr 2002, 22:01
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: UTC +8
Posts: 2,626
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
"Safety Altitudes" as you say are depicted on en route charts as MEAs (minimum en route altitude) and on approach charts as MSAs (minimum sector/safe altitude).
GlueBall is offline  
Old 18th Apr 2002, 08:57
  #3 (permalink)  


PPRuNeaholic
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Cairns FNQ
Posts: 3,255
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Lightbulb

This term is used in Papua New Guinea to generically describe any altitude at which flight is safely possible in IMC, in any particular circumstance. Thus, it can relate to the lowest altitude for enroute flight, or MSA, or lowest holding altitude. We also use it to include the concept of an "area minimum altitude", which is an area enclosed between specific lat/long grids.

In each case, it relates to terrain clearance only. Thus, it is calculated by taking the elevation of the highest terrain within the particular protection area, adding the chart error value plus an allowance for tree growth. To this we add the Minimum Obstacle Clearance specified by ICAO in Pans Ops. A further allowance is made for QNH vagaries and the resultant figure is rounded up, if necessary, to the next whole 100 feet.

The elements may be somewhat different in other parts of the world.
OzExpat is offline  
Old 19th Apr 2002, 23:45
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: On a big rock, 93 million miles from the Sun!
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
You're flying in the UK right? Well Glueball is basically right that you use the MEA/MSA on the chart. If you're using your Half Mil then take the figure quoted in your square, add 300' because that is the max height of a structure in the UK without informing the authorities, then add a further 1000' for safety margin and you have your en-route MSA. If you want to be more accurate then you can do the same sums for the tallest structure within 10nm either side of your track.

Within 25nm of an aerodrome you can use the MSA quoted on your Aerad/Jeppy plate for IFR procedures directly from the plate using the numbers given directly as the safety factors are already accounted for.

Hope that helps...
Dr. Nick is offline  
Old 20th Apr 2002, 02:33
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Florida, USA
Posts: 632
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
...and that just goes to show that there is a lot to be said for reading something twice before coming to a firm conclusion.

I initially thought that Dr. Nick just said ONE HUNDRED feet above MEF+300....but I go with his plan of MEF+300+1000 - rounded to the next whole hundred.

Flight BELOW this altitude is acceptable - provided you know where you are, know where you are going and can clearly see the way. If you lose any one of those components - CLIMB and then screw yourself for getting that far without having the sense to turn round, and go back, earlier.
GoneWest is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.