Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Ground & Other Ops Forums > Questions
Reload this Page >

Yaw Dampers Vs. T.A.C.

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Questions If you are a professional pilot or your work involves professional aviation please use this forum for questions. Enthusiasts, please use the 'Spectators Balcony' forum.

Yaw Dampers Vs. T.A.C.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 17th April 2002 | 16:46
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 609
Likes: 1
From: Around the world.
Yaw Dampers Vs. T.A.C.

Hi all,
Sadly another one of my stupid questions:
The way I understand it (I fly only GA aircraft) the yaw damper moves the rudder to prevent unwanted yaw, and to keep the aircraft in balance. Does the yaw damper have a limited authority over the rudder?....if it doesn't have limited authority, how come on say a 767, with an engine failure, rudder application by the pilot is needed...surely if the yaw damper has full authority, incase of assymetric thrust, it would just compensate for this. Secondly is thrust assymetry compensation essentially just a yaw damper with more authority over rudder movement?? Do any other aircraft apart from the 777 have T.A.C.???
Thanks for any answers.
tom.
tom775257 is offline  
Old 17th April 2002 | 18:07
  #2 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
Veteran: Navy
 
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 3,204
Likes: 2
From: Seattle
Yes, the yaw damper has limited authority. It depends on the airplane, but likely the damper can put less than 5% of full throw on the rudder, and usually much less than that. Remember, the damper is designed to reduce the _rate_ of yaw, not necessarily the yaw itself.

The 747-400 has what you describe as T.A.C. only in the Approach mode, when all 3 autopilots are working simultaneously. In normal single-autopilot mode, the autopilot does not control the rudder (though the dual yaw dampers are still operating).
Intruder is offline  
Old 18th April 2002 | 06:34
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 941
Likes: 0
From: what U.S. calls Žold EuropeŽ
Tom,

you are confusing two completely different things :
The yaw damper is not a sideslip angle controler, it compensates movement around the vertical axis, not misalignment with flight direction. The yaw damper is either using the inertial platform or a lateral accelerometer at the nose or the tail of the plane to detect movement around the vertical axis (yaw) and gives adverse rudder to stop this movement. It is designed to avoid dutch rolling of the plane and not to avoid sideslip angles. If the plane is flying stable with 5° sideslip (ie. due to engine thrust asymetry), the yaw damper is not doing anything.
In case of sudden engine failure a yaw will occur and the yaw damper will give adverse rudder, but limited autority will produce a certain sideslip angle. If this angle is stabilized, the yaw damper will not react anymore to the situation.
Volume is offline  
Old 18th April 2002 | 12:12
  #4 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 609
Likes: 1
From: Around the world.
Thank you,
That information from you two clears that one up for me.
One final question then (assuming I am understanding this correctly): If the yaw damper responds to acceleration around the vertical axis, what information inputs does the T.A.C. need? Can it gain information on whether a side-slip is occuring from the inertial system?
Cheers,
Tom.

Last edited by tom775257; 18th April 2002 at 21:49.
tom775257 is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.