Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Ground & Other Ops Forums > Questions
Reload this Page >

Blow Bolts Or not?

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Questions If you are a professional pilot or your work involves professional aviation please use this forum for questions. Enthusiasts, please use the 'Spectators Balcony' forum.

Blow Bolts Or not?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 9th April 2002 | 22:28
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 48
Likes: 0
From: London
Question Blow Bolts Or not?

I saw on a Tv programe some thing about Blow Bolts. They were Looking in to see if they would work on 747`s and was under going testing this was a few months back and was wondering if they r on such planes now what they do is the Pilots can release one of there engines if it catchs fire and they carnt put it out. thanks.. D.Lucas
DavidLucas2002 is offline  
Old 10th April 2002 | 05:57
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 941
Likes: 0
From: what U.S. calls ´old Europe´
Dropping an engine looks like a quite stupid idea :
- you might hurt someone on the ground
- yor CG will probably be out of limits afterwards (most twins with wing mounted engines have weights attached to the pylon during production to avoid them falling on their tail, for fuselage mounted engines it´s even worst)

To learn more about blow bolts you should look up some space technology pages in the web (maybe the NACA-report server contains some usefull information) because they are widely used in spacecraft design.
Volume is offline  
Old 10th April 2002 | 10:15
  #3 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 48
Likes: 0
From: London
Thanks BTW they were designed for droping them over the sea not over land. Thanks
DavidLucas2002 is offline  
Old 10th April 2002 | 14:01
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 4,569
Likes: 1
From: Florida
I wonder how they would ensure the reliability of these fuses would exceed the reliability of the fire extinguishing system in a nacelle.

Sounds to me like the consequences of a an exploding bolt system malfunction may be worse than the cure.
lomapaseo is offline  
Old 10th April 2002 | 15:34
  #5 (permalink)  
Moderator
30 Countries Visited
25 Anniversary
Veteran: Reserves
 
Joined: Feb 2000
Aviation Qualifications: CPL
Posts: 14,480
Likes: 178
From: UK
Having a little experience of exploding bolts, it's actually fairly straightforward to design a system which, in both senses, is tolerant of both a single undemanded bolt actuation, and similarly a single bolt that fails to blow when required - if you want to consider double/triple failures that can be done as well, it's just a bit more complex.

A bigger problem might well be finding any existing ground crew able to deal with explosive devices on civil aircraft. Or airports comfortable having them sat on the pan - particularly given the huge amount of EMC affecting radiation swashing most airports, which can be bad news in conjunction with electrically operated explosives.

G
Genghis the Engineer is offline  
Old 10th April 2002 | 15:41
  #6 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 48
Likes: 0
From: London
ok thanks for all your help
DavidLucas2002 is offline  
Old 10th April 2002 | 17:38
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 724
Likes: 0
From: United Kingdom
Can actually lose an engine on the 747 and it will remain flyable.
Lucifer is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.