Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Ground & Other Ops Forums > Questions
Reload this Page >

Bird strikes becoming too common?


Notices
Questions If you are a professional pilot or your work involves professional aviation please use this forum for questions. Enthusiasts, please use the 'Spectators Balcony' forum.

Bird strikes becoming too common?

Old 28th April 2012 | 23:07
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 68
Likes: 26
From: The Orient
Bird strikes becoming too common?

A Reuters report on April 25 :

NEW YORK, April 25 (Reuters) - A bird strike forced a
JetBlue flight bound for Florida to make an emergency return to
Westchester Airport, the airline said on Wednesday, the second
such incident at a New York area airport in less than two weeks.

Flight 571, scheduled for a 6:45 p.m. EDT Tuesday departure
from the West Harrison, New York airport for West Palm Beach,
encountered the birds shortly after takeoff, according to a
JetBlue statement.

"Out of an abundance of caution for the safety of the
passengers and crew onboard, the captain elected to return to
the gate," the JetBlue statement said.

None of the 54 customers or 4 crew members aboard the
Embraer 190 aircraft was injured, the airline said.

The flight landed safely and the passengers were reboarded
onto another aircraft that departed for West Palm Beach at 8:25
p.m., arriving in West Palm Beach at about midnight, the airline
said.

JetBlue did not confirm how many or what kind of birds were
involved. Westchester Airport spokesmen were not immediately
available for comment.

Last week, a bird strike shortly after takeoff forced a Delta
Air Lines flight to make an emergency return to New York's John
F. Kennedy International Airport.

According to the FAA's website, wildlife strikes are not
uncommon, with an average of 26 strikes a day in recent years.

I guess the mods may bump this off to the spotters corner, but incidences like this are becoming all too common. We often have ATCs and ATIS information advising " exercise caution, bird activity in the vicinity ". Yeah, right exercise caution...not at 100 ft AGL on a runway/ obstacle limited takeoff or landing when the flocks suddenly appear out of nowhere. If it were the migratory flocks, they may be visible whereby takeoffs could be delayed and landing approaches aborted. If the flocks just soared up from nearby forested areas, then it's no telling how much damage they can cause.

Airport authorities make a big show of the ways of scaring away birds, but are they proactive and doing enough?
bakutteh is offline  
Reply
Old 29th April 2012 | 00:31
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 41
Likes: 0
From: Sentul
A simple question, if you spy a flock of birds going into your flight path during takeoff, would you reject after crossing a 100kts?
Sampan Angkasa is offline  
Reply
Old 29th April 2012 | 01:28
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jun 1999
Posts: 408
Likes: 0
From: Queensland
Have a really good look before 100k during every take-off.
autoflight is offline  
Reply
Old 29th April 2012 | 11:17
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 8,266
Likes: 1
From: Berkshire, UK
It's not a recent thing. I was on watch at Heathrow back in the 70s when there were 210 bird strikes in a few minutes and both runways had to be closed!
HEATHROW DIRECTOR is offline  
Reply
Old 29th April 2012 | 12:37
  #5 (permalink)  

Bottums Up
 
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 3,440
Likes: 3
From: dunnunda
Are bird strikes becoming too common?
Not in my part of the world. Between 1999 & 2005 whilst on the BAe146 I had so many that I was unfairly given the sobriquet of chick magnet.

2005 to 2012, B717, same routes, same times, 1 bird in '06 and one bat in '11.

I'd really love to know why the difference.
Capt Claret is offline  
Reply
Old 29th April 2012 | 15:00
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 99
Likes: 0
From: Takeshima
I'd really love to know why the difference.
Massive development, unseen pollutants from the mining and other industries could have destroyed avian habitat in the region.

Just like in the US and elsewhere, the extensive use of herbicide and insecticide as well as other chemicals have led to a massive drop of the number of honey bees.
gerago is offline  
Reply
Old 5th May 2012 | 10:45
  #7 (permalink)  
20 Countries Visited
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,145
Likes: 31
From: Skating away on the thin ice of a new day.
Capt C the difference is the 146 can get bird strikes from either direction. Some would say more so from the rear.
ampclamp is offline  
Reply
Old 5th May 2012 | 13:29
  #8 (permalink)  

Bottums Up
 
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 3,440
Likes: 3
From: dunnunda
G'day Ampclamp,

I know. But in my case all were from the front.
Capt Claret is offline  
Reply
Old 5th May 2012 | 21:28
  #9 (permalink)  
20 Countries Visited
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,145
Likes: 31
From: Skating away on the thin ice of a new day.
sorry skipper, it is an oldy...but worth a run. Nice to fly around in and as smooth as anything to land but still gives me the creeps thinking about maintaining it.
ampclamp is offline  
Reply
Old 5th May 2012 | 22:51
  #10 (permalink)  

Bottums Up
 
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 3,440
Likes: 3
From: dunnunda
... and to operate it!
Capt Claret is offline  
Reply
Old 9th May 2012 | 08:49
  #11 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 1998
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL
Posts: 1,595
Likes: 0
From: Formerly of Nam
I would've thought these average garden slug tree-hugging
whale-loving PC-rabid commie fluffies would've successfully
argued in court that birds owned the sky first - and had the
aviation industry reduced by now to Zeppelins and hot-air
balloons paying airspace fees to flocks of geese & sparrows.
Slasher is offline  
Reply
Old 9th May 2012 | 13:54
  #12 (permalink)  
Community Builder
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Aviation Qualifications: LAME
Posts: 2,279
Likes: 186
From: Dorset UK
When I worked on the ramp at Bournemouth (Hurn) airport, I used to see the fire crew doing their bird scaring duties. They would drive around making squawking noises and firing things that went bang. The birds would take off, fly around for a while and then land back on the airfield.

I suggested that perhaps if they used a 12 bore shotgun and killed a few, the others might get the idea they were not wanted around the airfield and bu**er off.

Not allowed !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
dixi188 is offline  
Reply
Old 9th May 2012 | 18:48
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,656
Likes: 0
From: fort sheridan, il
back in the heady days after sully turned an airbus into a boat, I offered bird evasion techniques. I still stand by them.

I do ask that someone somehow actually take a look at which engines and airframes seem most effected by the birds. those engines with the extra wide inlets just seem asking for more problems than the little skinny ones with smaller inlets (and yes i'm being a little silly here, not naming names of engine types...but you know which engines I'm talking about). Please also remember that fuel efficent engines are in more wide spread circulation (forgive the pun) than they were 30 years ago...more birds? more fuel efficent engines...?

hmmm
sevenstrokeroll is offline  
Reply
Old 9th May 2012 | 19:53
  #14 (permalink)  
Sir George Cayley
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
7sr.

A/c hit birds on just about any leading surface from nose to tail, wingtip to wingtip. Engine bird ingestion is only one of a number of strike scenarios, though clearly a bigger hazard.

I've a suspicion you are thinking that engines suck birds in which is not the case. If I've misunderstood please correct me.

I'm sure you know this site but I've put the link up for anyone interested.

Federal Aviation Administration

I'm in favour of public executions 'pour encourager les autres'

SGC
 
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.