Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Ground & Other Ops Forums > Questions
Reload this Page >

Single engine climb at V2 or Vref ?

Wikiposts
Search
Questions If you are a professional pilot or your work involves professional aviation please use this forum for questions. Enthusiasts, please use the 'Spectators Balcony' forum.

Single engine climb at V2 or Vref ?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 22nd Feb 2012, 15:42
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Where the Quaboag River flows, USA
Age: 71
Posts: 3,414
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Airbii have "green dot" speed in the PFD, also

Mutt

Funny thing, one didn't need to mention the L-1011 TrStar to have 411A bring the thread around to the L1011. Haven't checked, but I'll bet he could get the L10 into a thread about Pitts Specials.
galaxy flyer is offline  
Old 22nd Feb 2012, 21:12
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Seattle
Posts: 3,196
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Im quite surprised that none of you know what Im talking about.
I'm not. You claim to "know" things about a SIMULATION of a particular airplane, but have no real knowledge of the reality of flying large and/or complex airplanes. Those of us who fly airplanes for a living realize that there are often [not-so-] subtle differences between regulation/certification, display in the cockpit, and real-time use of all that information.

On takeoff and initial climb, we use V2 and don't explicitly worry about Vref. The exception is an immediate return; and as I explained earlier, V2 is a reasonable replacement for Vref in that case. In cruise, we don't worry about either one. On descent, approach, and landing we worry about Vref and not V2. While we "know" in the back of our minds what kind of protections we are given by each number, we don't worry about the specifics real-time.
Intruder is offline  
Old 23rd Feb 2012, 07:25
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Honolulu
Posts: 197
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
V2 is not a fixed speed it varies with weight, between take off and landing you will burn a significant amount of fuel (weight) so vref will be determined by landing weight. V2 is not a factor during landing as previously stated. Cruise speed is typically a mach number (unless flying at a low altitude) based on weight and altitude and temperature and is not a fixed number. High speed/low speed buffet limits and g protection come into play here. I think you are trying to simplify something which is not always so simple.
Junkflyer is offline  
Old 25th Feb 2012, 05:25
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Pergatory
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
And when during takeoff Vref rises above V2 I assume Vref as minimum speed to fly and no longer V2.
Does this happen when you retract the flaps after takeoff?
formulaben is offline  
Old 26th Feb 2012, 05:26
  #25 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Paris, London and New York
Age: 29
Posts: 52
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
No, it happens below 1500' as we continue takeoff with simulated engine out well above ground effect and after gear up. So no configuration changes take place at that time. Cessna advises to climb at V2 which is set on the ground based on field elevation and weight but does not take into consideration increasing altitude during climb out. It cought me by surprise as to how quicly Vref climbs over V2 and Im not sure as to why but Im quite convinced I should not fly below Vref as its constantly recomputed and adjusted by FMS.
Dariuszw is offline  
Old 26th Feb 2012, 14:13
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: ME
Posts: 5,502
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
V2 is 1.13 times Vs1G (1.2 Vs) while VREF is 1.23 times Vs1G (1.3 Vs), so as you are talking about the same configuration on takeoff, would you not expect the Vref to be higher?

Your error is that you now think you should fly this higher speed, but have you considered that if you continue to chase the Vref speed, what is going to happen to your climb gradient? What happens to your 35 feet clearance over the obstacles?
mutt is offline  
Old 26th Feb 2012, 19:59
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: 41S174E
Age: 57
Posts: 3,095
Received 481 Likes on 129 Posts
It´s such a silly question that I wouldn't have even thought it worth answering yet we have two pages on it.....crazy. It is like asking ¨How come the manufacturer of my car suggests using th foot pedal brakes while driving yet suggests using the park brake when stopped on a hill?....surely they don't want me to not use the foot pedal?¨ It just shows a complete lack of understanding of driving a car.
framer is offline  
Old 27th Feb 2012, 13:51
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Home soon
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Guys ,we all know this darius is having fun using your time ....
Let him be ..
de facto is offline  
Old 29th Feb 2012, 15:37
  #29 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Paris, London and New York
Age: 29
Posts: 52
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well ladies, I really would hate to waste your time and as some of you already know me, Im a gambling person. So here is your big chance to prove yourself. Care to put some money that what Im stateting is pure nonesense ???? Im in EDDL right ´now and have two more flights tonight on my .....SIM yet so when I get back home tonight I will accept any of your bets and then I will post pictures from my last flight proving it true. Till then...

Lets see if de Facto will be the first here to bet with this foolish 17 year old Darius ;-)
Dariuszw is offline  
Old 29th Feb 2012, 16:40
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: HKG
Age: 47
Posts: 1,007
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well if your are telling the truth well done on having a total lack of understanding and putting your passengers at risk. Surely you should know this before you get in the plane. Chasing an increasing speed with an engine failing at V1, you truly are an incompetent fool.
SloppyJoe is offline  
Old 29th Feb 2012, 18:31
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: My views - Not my employer!
Posts: 1,031
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Darius,

What we are saying to you is:

We know what you are observing is correct, that your V2 is lower than your Vref.

V2 and Vref aren't the same, don't treat them the same....
Cough is offline  
Old 1st Mar 2012, 03:59
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Home soon
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Im not sure as to why but Im quite convinced I should not fly below Vref
Convinced about something you are not sure huh..?
I suggest before this mentality kills you and your pax that you follow your sops/aircraft training manual.

Is that true your pax pay big money to be flown by you?
de facto is offline  
Old 1st Mar 2012, 05:02
  #33 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Paris, London and New York
Age: 29
Posts: 52
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Since I will not address each and everyone of those you know what....Let this be a lesson to all the rest of you ! There are many who will spew nonesense all day long here insulting others but when told to put weight behind what they spew none will have the guts ! So if u cant put money where your mouth is then you are just static, irrelevent, wasted time !



Mutt - You are absolutely correct. V2 is 1.2Vs and as such should be in theory less then Vref. My incorrect thinking was that I always assumed V2 to be equivalent to Vxse ( best angle of climb with single engine) which should be at or above Vref and that is not correct. V2 is minimum flying speed and is less then Vxse. That would explain Vref climb above V2 but why then it starts about 10kts below V2 hmm... ?

Mutt to aswer your question -what would happen to my climb performance and gradient if I increase my speed above V2 (up to some point) - I would answer that my climb performance and gradient will increase since V2 is not a performance limiting speed (like Vxse or Vyse)but mere minimum allowed flying speed with single engine. Do you disagree ?

Feel free guys to explain how your logic fits to this picture....be my guest !

Last edited by Dariuszw; 1st Mar 2012 at 13:22.
Dariuszw is offline  
Old 1st Mar 2012, 15:03
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Pergatory
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Quite simple: your V2 bug is a fixed bug, meaning it is calculated and then fixed to the airspeed tape. Your Vref bug is AoA CALCULATED...if in anything other than stabilized flight (accelerated flight) and IT WILL MOVE. Also, those bugs are usually FLAP COMPENSATED...I see you are 270 feet off the ground. Did you do a flaps 0 takeoff?
formulaben is offline  
Old 1st Mar 2012, 16:42
  #35 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: far too low
Posts: 231
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Taking pictures when you're operating 270' off the ground. Genius idea
gorter is offline  
Old 1st Mar 2012, 17:16
  #36 (permalink)  

"Mildly" Eccentric Stardriver
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: England
Age: 77
Posts: 4,142
Received 224 Likes on 66 Posts
This guy is giving us MSFS pilots a bad name!
Herod is offline  
Old 1st Mar 2012, 23:33
  #37 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Sale, Australia
Age: 80
Posts: 3,832
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
There are many who will spew nonesense all day long here insulting others but when told to put weight behind what they spew none will have the guts ! So if u cant put money where your mouth is then you are just static, irrelevent, wasted time
Yep, that describes you to a T.
Brian Abraham is offline  
Old 3rd Mar 2012, 07:35
  #38 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Paris, London and New York
Age: 29
Posts: 52
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
formulaben - It was 15 degrees of flaps t/o all the way to 1500ft but perhaps your explenation could be correct as FMS might have a delay due to continued acceleration which can be seen by trend indicator. This film has been taken by colique of mine for maintenance consultation and comparison to other aircrafts in our fleet. I like your explenation and I think you might be right on the money Thank you !

One more thing that is a bit confusing for me is: V2.
Since V2 according to what I read is not Vxse but rather minimum flying speed with single engine then what is Vxse and why Cessna adiveses to maintain V2 instead of Vxse which could be Im guessing here V2+10 ?
Dariuszw is offline  
Old 3rd Mar 2012, 15:28
  #39 (permalink)  

"Mildly" Eccentric Stardriver
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: England
Age: 77
Posts: 4,142
Received 224 Likes on 66 Posts
Why don't you ask them?
Herod is offline  
Old 3rd Mar 2012, 15:54
  #40 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Pergatory
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It was 15 degrees of flaps t/o all the way to 1500ft but perhaps your explenation could be correct as FMS might have a delay due to continued acceleration which can be seen by trend indicator.
No delay, real-time 1.3 Vs which changes with flap setting (you do know that, don't you?!) Flaps go up, your Vref bug goes up...do a flaps zero takeoff and it will be above V2.
formulaben is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.