Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Ground & Other Ops Forums > Questions
Reload this Page >

Asymmetric landing gear extention

Wikiposts
Search
Questions If you are a professional pilot or your work involves professional aviation please use this forum for questions. Enthusiasts, please use the 'Spectators Balcony' forum.

Asymmetric landing gear extention

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 17th Jan 2012, 14:26
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Paris, London and New York
Age: 29
Posts: 52
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Asymmetric landing gear extention

Recently I have seen an incident/accident report of landing with asymmetrical landing gear extention. Crew elected to land with partial gear and stopped perfectly fine on the runway center line. My question to you fine people is which one is better, landing with no gear or landing with partial gear?
My craft manufacturer does not opine on the subject and emergency checklists have no asymmetrical extention option so it seems to leave decision to pilots. Arguments for landing asymmetricly would be at least partial braking and directional control as well as perhaps less demage to undercarrige. For retracted gear landing lesser chance of rolling the plane.

So whats your opinion ?
Dariuszw is offline  
Old 17th Jan 2012, 15:29
  #2 (permalink)  
Per Ardua ad Astraeus
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 18,579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My question to you fine people is which one is better, landing with no gear or landing with partial gear?
- the answer is whatever the QRH says, normally. If it ignores the problem, your choice.
BOAC is offline  
Old 21st Jan 2012, 00:29
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Melbourne
Age: 60
Posts: 952
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Also is going to depend on which gear isn't down and your aircraft type (e.g. high or low wing, jet, turboprop, etc). As BOAC said, check the QRH.

Arguments for landing asymmetricly would be at least partial braking and directional control as well as perhaps less demage to undercarrige.
I'd agree with that if it were the nose gear that hadn't come down. Not so sure if it were either main gear.
Di_Vosh is offline  
Old 21st Jan 2012, 06:21
  #4 (permalink)  

PPRuNe Handmaiden
 
Join Date: Feb 1997
Location: Duit On Mon Dei
Posts: 4,672
Received 52 Likes on 28 Posts
Ours recommends that if the nose gear does not deploy, land all wheels up.
It's built to do that.
redsnail is offline  
Old 25th Jan 2012, 20:54
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: uk
Posts: 280
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
As suggested already, follow the QRH. Most heavy jet manufacturers recommend landing with any available gear extended. This retains at least partial impact energy absorption and some, albeit limited, post touchdown braking and control. Aircraft evacuation slides are designed to cope with the unusual fuselage angles that might result from an assymetric gear landing.
777fly is offline  
Old 25th Jan 2012, 23:02
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 2,091
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 8 Posts
' #4 (permalink)
redsnail

PPRuNe Handmaiden

Join Date: Feb 1997
Location: Duit On Mon Dei
Posts: 3,726

Ours recommends that if the nose gear does not deploy, land all wheels up.
It's built to do that. '


What kind of Aircraft is that redsnail ?
stilton is offline  
Old 26th Jan 2012, 17:09
  #7 (permalink)  

PPRuNe Handmaiden
 
Join Date: Feb 1997
Location: Duit On Mon Dei
Posts: 4,672
Received 52 Likes on 28 Posts
Hawker 800XP
redsnail is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.