Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Ground & Other Ops Forums > Questions
Reload this Page >

Flex takeoffs only on Airbus?

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Questions If you are a professional pilot or your work involves professional aviation please use this forum for questions. Enthusiasts, please use the 'Spectators Balcony' forum.

Flex takeoffs only on Airbus?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 18th December 2011 | 23:49
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 116
Likes: 0
From: aussie land
Flex takeoffs only on Airbus?

Excuse my ignorance, but is the flex takeoff technique only used on Airbus series aircraft? How about the Boeing 777 and 787? Do they use similar reduced power takeoffs or do Boeings always use TOGA power?
JulieFlyGal is offline  
Reply
Old 19th December 2011 | 01:26
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
From: Home soon
Hello,

FLEX is a term used by Airbus, Boeing uses Assume Temperature whch is the same.Fool the computer that its warmer outside to reduce takeoff thrust,saving engine life by reducing egt up to 56c using max assum temp(25%).(b737).
Boeing also uses variable derate tomreducemtake off thrust when assume temp is not possible,assum temp can be used in conjunctionmwith derate.

Excuse my ipad typing
de facto is offline  
Reply
Old 19th December 2011 | 19:10
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 1,841
Likes: 0
From: Europe
As said above...however the term flex isn't exclusive to airbus... We use the same term on the embraer ejet...
Aussie is offline  
Reply
Old 3rd January 2012 | 07:28
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
From: Euroland
...so do we on the good old Fokker 70/100. Named "Flex" as well.

Cheers!
ManualFlight is offline  
Reply
Old 3rd January 2012 | 07:39
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 52
Likes: 0
From: Paris, London and New York
Question:

I understand we reduce thrust due to warmer then standard temps or higher then standard density altitude in order to limit I guess ITT and preserve this way engine life. But N1 is reduced also when temp are colder then standard. Is it because of stractural limits or what.... ??
Dariuszw is offline  
Reply
Old 4th January 2012 | 01:59
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 1,841
Likes: 0
From: Europe
No, i think your missing the point...

We still limit the n1 power for takeoff even if it is colder then standard (ISA) because we can still further preserve engine life... the power req for takeoff from performance calculations tells us we need say 84.5% N1, where the full power takeoff gives us an N1 limit of say 89% So then using the flex temp, we tell the fadec to limit the N1 to that minimum req from calcs, and engine life is preserved, company saves another dollar....


Feel free to correct or add anything boys and girls
Aussie is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.