to dump or not to dump
Guest
Posts: n/a
I dont know why some aircraft do have it and some dont.
On our 767 fleet we have some aircraft with MTOW of 185,065kg, and MLW of 145,150kg which dont have fuel dump capability. Some with an MTOW of 172,365kg that do have it, some have a MLW of 136,000kg and some of those do and dont.
And to top it all off there is a mix of high (1200lt/min) and low (600lt/min) capacity systems!
I think the fact of the matter is that it is fairly safe to land an aircraft at MTOW, even though its not entirely legal!
On our 767 fleet we have some aircraft with MTOW of 185,065kg, and MLW of 145,150kg which dont have fuel dump capability. Some with an MTOW of 172,365kg that do have it, some have a MLW of 136,000kg and some of those do and dont.
And to top it all off there is a mix of high (1200lt/min) and low (600lt/min) capacity systems!
I think the fact of the matter is that it is fairly safe to land an aircraft at MTOW, even though its not entirely legal!
Guest
Posts: n/a
Thanks HPSOV, F/O Junior and Deep Stall. No offence taken Lucifer, I usually manage to steer clear of you flying club types full of p**** and wind and no substance. I realise that aircraft with an MTWA/MTOW the same as the landing weight do not need to have this facility, perhaps I should have made that clear. The others seemed to get the point though.
Guest
Posts: n/a
The main reason for dumping fuel is in the event of an emergency. However as both Boeing and Airbus say that you can land at max all up weight (not greater than 300 feet per minute rate of decsent) there is not much point in having fuel dump.
Furthermore we have all done engine failures at V1 at heavy weights, so the go around is no great problem either (not easy, but that is why we practice).
Furthermore we have all done engine failures at V1 at heavy weights, so the go around is no great problem either (not easy, but that is why we practice).