Wikiposts
Search
Questions If you are a professional pilot or your work involves professional aviation please use this forum for questions. Enthusiasts, please use the 'Spectators Balcony' forum.

BA 772

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 25th Sep 2011, 01:53
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: sudan
Posts: 58
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
fish BA 772

hey there


as we know that british airways powers its boeing 772 with either rr trent800 or ge90 engines , but i noticed that it serves LHR -singapore - sydney route with its 772 with rr trent800 , in other words never uses 772 with ge90 in this sector , the link below supports what i said , i'd like to know why is that , is it for technical reasons related with engines or what ?? is rr trent800 is more efficient than ge90 for long haul flights or it burns less fuel ???
adarob is offline  
Old 25th Sep 2011, 09:34
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: The Winchester
Posts: 6,555
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
never uses 772 with ge90 in this sector ,
The GE engined -200s are certified for a lower takeoff weight than the 200s with the Trent, so your payload would would restricted on the longer sectors, and also BA's GE engined 777-200s don't have any onboard crew rest facilities installed so you'd run into problems with crew duty times on the LHR-SIN and SYD-LHR sectors.
wiggy is online now  
Old 25th Sep 2011, 09:43
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: England
Posts: 67
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
You are right, but I think the GE engined ones (200LR) have the higher gross weight/range/CRC fitted ;-). Empty the 200LR is a rocket.
Mr Levitator is offline  
Old 26th Sep 2011, 02:02
  #4 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: sudan
Posts: 58
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Angel

dear wiggy

as you said that (BA's GE engined 777-200s don't have any onboard crew rest facilities installed so you'd run into problems with crew duty times on the LHR-SIN and SYD-LHR sectors).


that's a v.good answer , but it seems to me that ge90 & pw4000 engines have the ability to fly for long haul flights , for example : austrian airlines was using ge90 engines on its 772 on Vienna - Kula lumpur - sydney sector , as well as air austral uses its 772 with pw4000 engines in reunion - Sydney route


So do you mean that only BA 772 with ge90 engines is certified for a lower takeoff weight & the payload would restricted on the longer sectors or its for any 772 powered with ge90 ???
adarob is offline  
Old 26th Sep 2011, 02:35
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: The Winchester
Posts: 6,555
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Hi adarob, I was specifically talking about BA's GE engined 200's, and even within that fleet there variances in the certified weights, dependant on wether it's an A market aircraft or an ER but they are always lower Max Take Off weights than the Trent engined -200ERs.

I don't have any information on what limits/weights the other operators you mention are using - maybe one of their Flightcrew will spot this thread and be able to help out.
wiggy is online now  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.