Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Ground & Other Ops Forums > Questions
Reload this Page >

Why are turbines more expensive than recip ?

Wikiposts
Search
Questions If you are a professional pilot or your work involves professional aviation please use this forum for questions. Enthusiasts, please use the 'Spectators Balcony' forum.

Why are turbines more expensive than recip ?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10th Aug 2001, 16:02
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Toronto, Ont, Canada
Posts: 223
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Why are turbines more expensive than recip ?

Just started reading some basics about turbine engines.

They seem to be much simpler than recips ???

Why are they more expensive ?

(and how much more expensive are they ? ... I briefly looked for prices on the web, didnt find anything yet).

Aside from the cost, do recips have *any* advantage over turbines ?

Mike
mstram is offline  
Old 10th Aug 2001, 16:23
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Three Tors
Posts: 405
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Because turbines (such as the PT-6 group of turboprops) spin so fast internally, they have to have an extrodinarily well engineered and strong bearings and other internal components. They also operate under very high temps and pressures so therefore have to be manufactured out of exotic materials such as titanium etc (read expensive to replace) to much more exacting tolerances. Sure, the turbine engines can go a long way further in regards to TBO, but they can just as quickly go u/s when they are not cared for properly (maintainence and operating proceedures).

"Recips" as you put it, are very much like the engine in your car, but your car doesn't have a swept volume of up to 720ci for the "flat" (or IO as some call them) motors, and many, many times that size for some of the big radials that have graced our skies in days gone by. They are around 1/10 the cost to overhaul than a turbine engine(generally speaking) and weigh much more than a turbine.

Besides, a turboprop can develop many more times the shaft horsepower than an equivelent weighing reciprocating engine. Imagine an engine for an aeroplane that is basically the same size as a 40lt steel drum, can run on some very different types of fuels, light enough for one strong man to be able to carry, and develops up to 1500shp up to a level much higher than a piston a/c. Now, to extract the same sort of horsepower out of a piston, you would find yourself with a massive engine that had many, many rows of cylinders, was difficult to tune properly, chewed through unbelievable amounts of fuel, and weighed around the same as a medium car. I kid you not.

Hope that helps.

[ 10 August 2001: Message edited by: 429 CJ ]
429 CJ is offline  
Old 10th Aug 2001, 17:00
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Arizona USA
Posts: 8,571
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

You must remember also that a turbine engine has life-limited parts, unlike recip engines which can be maintained on-condition.
With the FAA, this extends to the airframe of a turbine engine powered aircraft as well, phase checks (calendar and cycle limited) are required, not just annual inspections, as on recips.
Deep pockets are required.
411A is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.