Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Ground & Other Ops Forums > Questions
Reload this Page >

Airbrakes on Turboprops

Wikiposts
Search
Questions If you are a professional pilot or your work involves professional aviation please use this forum for questions. Enthusiasts, please use the 'Spectators Balcony' forum.

Airbrakes on Turboprops

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 6th Jul 2001, 00:22
  #1 (permalink)  
Airbanda
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Post Airbrakes on Turboprops

A wee technical question.

Couple of hours ago twin turbo prop (Dash8/ATR?)passed over circa FL80- I am just west of Northampton so it was probably Brum inbound. Appeared to have petale type airbrake in tail like F28/146 deployed. Never noticed anything similar before. Which type has this and what are the speed/ altitude limitations on use?
TIA
Airbanda
 
Old 8th Jul 2001, 03:49
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Oz
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Dash 8's have no airbrakes
Jim lovell is offline  
Old 8th Jul 2001, 05:05
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: KDEN
Posts: 220
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

A Beech 1900 has large horizontal strakes on the aft section, these could be mistaken for the aforementioned petals.
Cardinal is offline  
Old 9th Jul 2001, 12:31
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Norway
Posts: 361
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Question

Never heard of a Turbo prop with an airbrake. The flight idle position is, for all practical purposes, an airbrake.

If an aircraft manufacturer thought it necessary to have increased "braking capacity" in the air, all they would have to do is to rate the flight idle lower. Alternatively, a way to pull the power levers a small notch behind "regular" flight idle.

Nick
Nick Figaretto is offline  
Old 9th Jul 2001, 12:48
  #5 (permalink)  

Don Quixote Impersonator
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Australia
Age: 77
Posts: 3,403
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Nick
gaunty is offline  
Old 9th Jul 2001, 13:17
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Norway
Posts: 361
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Talking

YES!!! I know what you are trying to say.

Pulling the PLs behind flight idle is not very smart... I know Fokker have made some computer analysis of "What will happen if I pulled the PLs into Ground Idle during flight?" The result was that IF the WOW-switch and the relees (?) in the pedestal fails, so that someone accidentally pulls the PLs to Ground Idle during flight, the airplane would lose some 20 000 ft in the recovery - IF the wings don't fall off. -Which they probably will.

What I am saying is, that I know that, for instance the Dash8 or a Beech King Air 200 has a larger drag (thus steeper descent profile) when the PLs are in flight idle than the Fokker 50. Similarly, a Cessna Caravan can keep almost Vmo till 5 miles final because of the extreme air-braking obtained when pulling the PLs to Flight Idle.

Thus - If the aircraft needed greater "air braking capability" it would be easier to make the aerodynamic drag from the propeller blades larger at Flight Idle, than making an extra, technically advanced and expensive air brake in the aircraft tail or on the wings.

To ensure that "speed brakes" is not used at normal descent, there could be 5 detent positions on the PLs:[list=1][*]Max detent[*]Flight Idle[*]"Air brake"[*]Ground idle[*]Reverse[/list=a]

Just a suggestion to the aircraft engineers.

Any comments other than ?

We should have some of the engineers who are usually on "Tech log" to look at this. I will demand royalties !

Nick.
Nick Figaretto is offline  
Old 9th Jul 2001, 14:18
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 1998
Location: Escapee from Ultima Thule
Posts: 4,273
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Talking

Nah, Nick, some smartarse would just come up with a differently named system...

-----------
Max detent

Flight Idle

Speed Reduction (tm)

Ground idle

Reverse
-----------------

NB All enquiries to 'Tinny's Amazing Devices, Inc'.

Quick (5 minutes) and convenient on-ramp/no downtime modifation kits to convert your turboprop from those other, unsatisfactory air braking methods to our unique speed reduction system. The supplied label maker is YOURS TO KEEP!

We firmly believe you get what you pay for. We charge extremely high premiums so you know it must be good!!
Tinstaafl is offline  
Old 9th Jul 2001, 16:15
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Norway
Posts: 361
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Angry

Jeez, You stole my invention!!! ;D

Part from that - is my reasoning correct, then?

Nick.
Nick Figaretto is offline  
Old 9th Jul 2001, 20:44
  #9 (permalink)  
Hwel
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Smile

20,000 feet and the wings fall off, I dont think so.
Channex got an F27 into GFP not 6 months ago. The exact date escapes me its published on the AAIB website in the last 2 months. Ok so it went down like a brick, but it was eminently survivable. and indeed survive they did.
 
Old 9th Jul 2001, 20:55
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Wet Coast
Posts: 2,335
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Exclamation

Nick,

It's been tried at least once.
NTSB report or another description
PaperTiger is offline  
Old 10th Jul 2001, 04:39
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 1998
Location: Escapee from Ultima Thule
Posts: 4,273
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Talking

Nick, it's obvious that my system is completely unrelated to yours, and is in fact a better system.

You can tell because it uses bigger words.

The premium version is now available, using recently developed 'Velocity Reduction' technology. This is available in a taxi in/taxi out bespoke services as well as the our well known field modification kits.

You sound like a forward thinking chap. Would you consider joining the research arm of 'Tinny's Technologies Ltd'** as a financial contributor & risk sharing partner. We're currently working on devices involving 'entropy'.


**'Tinny's Technologies Ltd' is a wholly owned research enterprise developing yet another fine product for 'Bastards Incorporated'
Tinstaafl is offline  
Old 10th Jul 2001, 22:10
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Uk
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Cool

From what I believe the problem is if only prop goes into Beta / Flight Idle or if they both go in and only one comes out!!
Try hanging on to that One!!
It has happened in the past with deadly results.
Great fun in Cessna Caravan
Last Sector Power is offline  
Old 11th Jul 2001, 19:00
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Norway
Posts: 361
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Talking

Paper Tiger & Whel: I read the articles. Jeez, even if they didn't lose 20 000 ft, it looks pretty scary anyway! That computer analysis that Fokker made may well have been a "worst case scenario," but I think the message comes trough: "Don't try to be a test pilot if you're not!"

Tinstaafl (what a weird name...): Wow, you've gor it all figured out, haven't you! 'Entropy' sounds pretty risky. I think I'd go for 'entalpy' instead .

Last Sector Power: You're probably right. I've also heard of incidents (or "near" incidents) where the A/C has experienced a sudden, strong yaw on final, because the flying pilot has tried to put the PLs just a "little bit" behind Flight Idle to make a shorter approach.

Nick
Nick Figaretto is offline  
Old 11th Jul 2001, 23:53
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Northampton, England
Age: 64
Posts: 468
Received 21 Likes on 17 Posts
Post

Thanks for all the replies, all that about the props and no need for airbrakes makes eminent sense. Looking in the spotters guides today,think cardinal probably has the answer.
Airbanda is offline  
Old 17th Jul 2001, 02:52
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Talking

Weird name? just need to brush up on your anacronyms Nick. Tinstaafl, I'll have a ploughmans, and your buying

[ 16 July 2001: Message edited by: Pdub ]

[ 16 July 2001: Message edited by: Pdub ]
Pdub is offline  
Old 17th Jul 2001, 03:19
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 1998
Location: Escapee from Ultima Thule
Posts: 4,273
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Post

No worries. You get the beer. Mine's a Guinness thanks.
Tinstaafl is offline  
Old 17th Jul 2001, 03:26
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

You mistook a Cardinal for a DASH8/ATR???? As the former lead FTE on one of the DASH8 flight test aircraft I should take the hump at you misidentifying my pride & joy!

As for placarding on the quadrant, you will find that FAR/JAR Pt25 is fairly strict on what labels are used for each position on the condition levers.

As for going into the ground beta range while in flight. Yes it has been done before on the larger commuter aircraft and a few engines have been oversped as a result! The gate to go from flight range to grond range requires lifting "triggers" to allow the levers to move further aft. Therefore, pilot action is required to go behind the "gate" so you can surmise how these in flight occurrences occurred!!

It should be reassuring to know that the authroities are now pushing beta lock-outs that will prevent selecting levers behind the gate in flight.

As for airbrakes; all comments about the big egg beaters being good airbrakes are perfectly true!

If you want to be a really techno whizz, you dont actually need condition levers. Through the wonders of FADEC and PEC (propeller electronic control) the balde angle is automatically controlled by the PEC while the FADEC sorts out the torque.

Hope this answers the question.
EX FTE is offline  
Old 18th Jul 2001, 13:07
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Germany
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

If you try to pull the trigger on a Dash 8 power lever you will hear an annoying sound. We call it the cockpit bird and use it to gain attention of the F/As` or to distrack them. A propaircraft with real airbrakes is the Transall used by the german army. Some of the Transallguys who joined my company told me they are really effective for so called Sarajevo approaches. On some regular approaches I think they`ve forgotten sitting on a Dash 8...check altitude...check pitch...check speed...check...aaaahhhh

Prost
Bullit is offline  
Old 19th Jul 2001, 01:18
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Northampton, England
Age: 64
Posts: 468
Received 21 Likes on 17 Posts
Post

Ex FTE- I was trying to say that somebody using the name Cardinal gave the most likely reply to my question. I might be a bit limited in middle age but I can still count engines!!
Airbanda is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.