'Sonic cruiser' claims
Guest
Posts: n/a
"The plush superjet is expected to knock up to 75 minutes off journey times between London and New York"
Can somebody help a poor non-tekkie understand how ?
Mach 1 = 658kts = 758mph (SA value)
LHR-JFK = 3451 miles
3451 at M0.95 = 4.79hrs = 4:47
3451 at M0.82 = 5.55hrs = 5:33
max saving = 0:46, and that's assuming M0.95 sustained for the entire block (not true) and flying a true GC (also not).
Is my math faulty ? Where's the 75 minutes ?
Genuine questions.
Can somebody help a poor non-tekkie understand how ?
Mach 1 = 658kts = 758mph (SA value)
LHR-JFK = 3451 miles
3451 at M0.95 = 4.79hrs = 4:47
3451 at M0.82 = 5.55hrs = 5:33
max saving = 0:46, and that's assuming M0.95 sustained for the entire block (not true) and flying a true GC (also not).
Is my math faulty ? Where's the 75 minutes ?
Genuine questions.
Guest
Posts: n/a
Yes something's obviously missing from my equation, but I can't seem to get my head round this.
If this SC thing cruises say 1/9th faster than yer average Boebus, then to achieve a 1 hour saving the current flight time has to be at least 9 hours (which LHR-JFK is not).
Or don't I have a clue ?
If this SC thing cruises say 1/9th faster than yer average Boebus, then to achieve a 1 hour saving the current flight time has to be at least 9 hours (which LHR-JFK is not).
Or don't I have a clue ?
Guest
Posts: n/a
Lucifer etc...
The speed of sound is lower at a higher altitude hence the speeds that you are all quoting are far too high. (hence the times, and thus, also, the time saving will be considerably greater than your estimate).
I don't have the ISA data in front of me, so this is only a generalisation, but I have it at home, so If you're really interested I will "do the math"
The speed of sound is lower at a higher altitude hence the speeds that you are all quoting are far too high. (hence the times, and thus, also, the time saving will be considerably greater than your estimate).
I don't have the ISA data in front of me, so this is only a generalisation, but I have it at home, so If you're really interested I will "do the math"
Guest
Posts: n/a
The Mach 1 (speed of sound) at FL350 in ISA conditions is 576.6 kt, above FL361 Mach 1 is 573.8 (up to about FL850).
Normal cruise for todays jets is around M0.82, in the FL350-FL400 region.
Sonic cruiser (#1), design cruise at FL400-FL450 M0.95
Sonic cuiser (#1) is 15% faster at FL400 than a current jet at FL350, 16% faster than a current jet at FL400.
Sonic cuiser (#1) is 15% faster at FL450 than a current jet at FL350, 16% faster than a current jet at FL400.
Sonic cuiser (#2) design cruise at FL400-FL450 M1.2
Sonic cuiser (#2) is 46% faster at FL400 than a current jet at FL350, 46% faster than a current jet at FL400.
Sonic cuiser (#2) is 46% faster at FL450 than a current jet at FL350, 46% faster than a current jet at FL400.

Edit : thanks babble silly mistake the numbers didn't even look close !
[This message has been edited by Zeke (edited 15 May 2001).]
Normal cruise for todays jets is around M0.82, in the FL350-FL400 region.
- FL350 M0.82 = 473 KTAS (353 KEAS)
- FL400 M0.82 = 471 KTAS (331 KEAS)
Sonic cruiser (#1), design cruise at FL400-FL450 M0.95
- FL400 M0.95 = 545 KTAS (384 KEAS)
- FL450 M0.95 = 545 KTAS (362 KEAS)
Sonic cuiser (#1) is 15% faster at FL400 than a current jet at FL350, 16% faster than a current jet at FL400.
Sonic cuiser (#1) is 15% faster at FL450 than a current jet at FL350, 16% faster than a current jet at FL400.
Sonic cuiser (#2) design cruise at FL400-FL450 M1.2
- FL400 M1.2 = 689 KTAS (485 KEAS)
- FL450 M1.2 = 689 KTAS (457 KEAS)
Sonic cuiser (#2) is 46% faster at FL400 than a current jet at FL350, 46% faster than a current jet at FL400.
Sonic cuiser (#2) is 46% faster at FL450 than a current jet at FL350, 46% faster than a current jet at FL400.
Edit : thanks babble silly mistake the numbers didn't even look close !
[This message has been edited by Zeke (edited 15 May 2001).]
Guest
Posts: n/a
<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" size="2">
The F-22 engines already allow super cuise at M2.0+ without afterburner, the engine technology exists.
</font>
The F-22 engines already allow super cuise at M2.0+ without afterburner, the engine technology exists.
</font>

edited for getting the quotes right
[This message has been edited by Pdub (edited 15 May 2001).]
Guest
Posts: n/a
pdub
Concorde's engines were developed for the military - they were designed for the TSR2 which had Mach 2 supercruise capabilities in the mid-1960's. A truly superlative aircraft which was sadly doomed due to idiotic politicians.
cheers!
foggy.
Concorde's engines were developed for the military - they were designed for the TSR2 which had Mach 2 supercruise capabilities in the mid-1960's. A truly superlative aircraft which was sadly doomed due to idiotic politicians.
cheers!
foggy.




