Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Ground & Other Ops Forums > Questions
Reload this Page >

why the name "scarebus?"

Wikiposts
Search
Questions If you are a professional pilot or your work involves professional aviation please use this forum for questions. Enthusiasts, please use the 'Spectators Balcony' forum.

why the name "scarebus?"

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 30th Mar 2002, 12:16
  #21 (permalink)  
KC-10 Driver
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Post

Q: What's the difference between an Airbus and a chain saw?. .. .A: About a thousand trees per minute.. .. .Before I get flamed, be advised I flew the A320, and I really loved it.
 
Old 31st Mar 2002, 14:05
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: UTC +8
Posts: 2,626
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Exclamation

More scary is to have rudder and vertical stab come unglued!
GlueBall is offline  
Old 31st Mar 2002, 22:14
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Camp X-Ray
Posts: 2,135
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well that has broadly the same outcome as an uncommanded rudder hardover, except the hardover isn't triggered by pilot input.
Hand Solo is offline  
Old 2nd Apr 2002, 05:43
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The new generation Airbus a/c auto stall protection is inhibited <100ft rad.alt. otherwise you would never be able to land ,but the Habsheim pilot "forgot" this when he pulled the sidestick full aft to show how smart the aircraft was...................
Airbus IS good technology -you just have to make a little effort to understand what your flying,respect the equipment and resist the temptation to go that bit further at airshows-every year that kills people...
Buster Hymen is offline  
Old 2nd Apr 2002, 16:42
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: the watch list
Posts: 516
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Cool

If we're gonna keep this up I might mention the time Airbus was demonstrating the 320 for an airline up north. A holding was demonstrated, this worked only the bus didn't want to leave the holding. I think they were in there for 45 min or so.

Or we can mention the time when a 340 started to dump fuel for no reason. They had to shut down the #3 ENG to make it stop.
Knold is offline  
Old 3rd Apr 2002, 21:52
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Camp X-Ray
Posts: 2,135
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yeah heard the holding one before. It's not true and anyone who had even half an idea of what an Airbus is about would know its impossible.
Hand Solo is offline  
Old 3rd Apr 2002, 22:27
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Mostly FL360-380, M0.78
Posts: 247
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Lightbulb

Have also heard the holding story, but it involved a Conair A320 (Premiair) being stuck in a holding in Southern Europe. Took ground techs and airbus an hour to come up with a solution.

True or not I don't know !
Jetavia is offline  
Old 4th Apr 2002, 05:43
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Sweden.
Posts: 95
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Exclamation

Interesting with those rumours....
Can anyone who was flying 320 for Conair at that time or anyone flying for that fueldumping-340-airline at that time post a reply telling us the real story...
Or maybe someone who worked for Airbus...
Or maybe someone from Boeing since another rumour says that they planted these funny stories...
Hot Rod is offline  
Old 5th Apr 2002, 03:53
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: uk
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Talking

Airbus crashes are down to lack of understanding of the a/c and lack of situational awareness. All the stories about not being able to exit holds etc are chinese whispers.
WhatFlare is offline  
Old 5th Apr 2002, 12:35
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Worldwide
Posts: 340
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Jetavia,

The only time I know of an airbus being held for 1+ hr is due to atc, sorry the AB cockpit automation does not have a solution for the mess europeans airspace is.

Knold, if the issue you mentioned did in fact take place would you can to indicate the whereabouts of the AD that came out as a result of this hyperthetical major defect.

The only people who seem to lable them scarebus at the moment is the senior marketing managers at Boeing who are getting scared by the bus looking like they will outsell them and out produce them.


Z
Zeke is offline  
Old 5th Apr 2002, 17:23
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Not East, Not West
Posts: 67
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The first time I heard the holding story it was about a Turkish 737 EFIS at Glasgow.

Some time ago an Airbus employee showed me an article on these urban myths. There must have been close to fifty of them.
Crusty Ol Cap'n is offline  
Old 5th Apr 2002, 22:21
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Earth, I think
Posts: 93
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
747flyboy, What Monarch were you working for???

We do however have a couple of A300-600R G-MONR "Non Runner" and G-MONS "Non Starter", but even so, their names are unjustified...
loggerhead is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.