Airline Employment
Guest
Posts: n/a
Airline Employment
What’s your opinion on the seniority system within the airlines? In just about any other industry, a job will be advertised according to a person’s skills. People are thereafter let go, or kept with the firm, according to their value to the firm.
In the airline industry, it’s usually a case of last person in becomes junior to those with more service with the airline, no matter what the discrepancy may be in their individual skills. Is this system fair?
In the airline industry, it’s usually a case of last person in becomes junior to those with more service with the airline, no matter what the discrepancy may be in their individual skills. Is this system fair?
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Confederatio Helvetica
Posts: 84
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
NO!. .It's union entrenched garbage that ensures snouts that would be unemployable elsewhere remain burried in their respective troughs.
I hold the view that its high time seniority was abolished completely from the airline industry. Whats wrong with using performance as the prerequisite for advancement?
[ 25 January 2002: Message edited by: Hold at Saffa ]</p>
I hold the view that its high time seniority was abolished completely from the airline industry. Whats wrong with using performance as the prerequisite for advancement?
[ 25 January 2002: Message edited by: Hold at Saffa ]</p>
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Unemployment line
Posts: 46
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
How would propose to measure performance of airline pilot? The majority of pilots do their job and keep their noses clean. Most have never spoken to the Chief Pilot and are just "another number." Seniority is the only way to justify layoffs. What's next, would you base compensation on performance also?
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Confederatio Helvetica
Posts: 84
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The same way every other business on earth does it, by using things that are objectively measureable. Safety, economy, punctuality, appearance, bearing, demeanour, affability toward fellow employees, the list is long and dull, but equitable.. . [quote]What's next, would you base compensation on performance also? <hr></blockquote>. .Yes, I would!
[ 25 January 2002: Message edited by: Hold at Saffa ]</p>
[ 25 January 2002: Message edited by: Hold at Saffa ]</p>
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Timbuktu
Posts: 638
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
[quote]appearance, bearing, demeanour<hr></blockquote>
Appearance...a nice white boy with clean shoes.
Bearing......Knows how to bend over, and does so without needing to be asked.
Demeanour....Suitably grovelling to me and the rest of management.
Yawwnnn...we've had this out already and it was binned as unworkable.
Next please.
Appearance...a nice white boy with clean shoes.
Bearing......Knows how to bend over, and does so without needing to be asked.
Demeanour....Suitably grovelling to me and the rest of management.
Yawwnnn...we've had this out already and it was binned as unworkable.
Next please.
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: UK
Posts: 60
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
In most companies it is a mixture of things. There is usually a minimum number of hours required, which can be TT, on type, etc. then there is usually some kind of assessment system. Then you go onto a list, usually in seniority order. So if you have low hours and newer pilots have high total hours you may get leapfrogged. I think its only the big carriers like BA who stop this.
