Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Ground & Other Ops Forums > Questions
Reload this Page >

Mach Numbers or Knots

Wikiposts
Search
Questions If you are a professional pilot or your work involves professional aviation please use this forum for questions. Enthusiasts, please use the 'Spectators Balcony' forum.

Mach Numbers or Knots

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 22nd Oct 2010, 10:32
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Warrington, UK
Posts: 3,840
Received 77 Likes on 32 Posts
Mach Numbers or Knots

Listening in to ATC as SLF on a United flight in the USA recently, ATC were requesting speeds as Mach numbers when at cruising levels, but as soon as the descent started they then used knots.

Why the difference?
MightyGem is offline  
Old 22nd Oct 2010, 12:24
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: England
Posts: 1,904
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Take 30 minutes to learn how airspeeds are related. You need to have an appreciation of Indicated, True and Mach airspeeds and how one changes with respect to the other as you climb and descend. I will try to state the most basic reason (in lay terms) but this can make up for a detailed discussion.

Flying at a constant Mach speed during the descent will push your Indicated airspeed into the "overspeed" range and you will probably rip your wings off within 5 minutes of commencing the decent. Decending at a constant Indicated airspeed (the speed ATC gives), results in the aircraft's True and Mach airspeeds being gradually reduced during the descent therefore ensuring the aircraft flies within the speed boundaries it was designed to.
Superpilot is offline  
Old 22nd Oct 2010, 16:05
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: at the whim of people I've never met
Age: 46
Posts: 607
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Chicken Tikka Masala - works for me every time
hollingworthp is offline  
Old 22nd Oct 2010, 16:49
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Jordan
Posts: 70
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Superpilot I Agree !
Nimer767 is offline  
Old 22nd Oct 2010, 17:06
  #5 (permalink)  
Per Ardua ad Astraeus
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 18,579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
MightyGem - I guess your plod chopper doesn't quite reach mach numbers, so to help you further (without the Indian take-away), jet a/c in general fly an IAS in climb and descent until/from about FL280 (I don't suppose you know where that is ), hence the 'change' in the R/T
BOAC is offline  
Old 23rd Oct 2010, 09:23
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: England
Posts: 1,904
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
To be honest I'm surprised that this topic does not feature at all for any CPL/ATPL(H) theory

And before anyone reminds me how low choppers actually fly, I will remind you how much surplus "knowledge" there is in ATPL(A) theory
Superpilot is offline  
Old 24th Oct 2010, 16:30
  #7 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Warrington, UK
Posts: 3,840
Received 77 Likes on 32 Posts
Flying at a constant Mach speed during the descent will push your Indicated airspeed into the "overspeed" range
Thanks, SP, I am familiar with that concept, but the question was more aimed at why the reference to mach numbers at cruising levels. Surely two aircraft at widely separated FLs, flying at the same mach number will/could have differing IAS/TASs, so why not using IAS anyway?
MightyGem is offline  
Old 24th Oct 2010, 16:53
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Inside
Posts: 285
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Once you are above crossover altitude you climb/descend at a constant Mach number so using IAS as a speed reference would be pretty useless. Just as having cruising traffic use IAS and traffic changing levels use Mach would be. Changing back and forth between the two every time you change level is an unnecessary additional complication.
One Outsider is offline  
Old 24th Oct 2010, 18:24
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: on the golf course (Covid permitting)
Posts: 2,131
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
In cruise, we may have 190 knots indicated, but be doing Mach .84.
Sh1t dude, you must be seriously high for that!

I have M0.85 at FL430 as 240 kts in a B747 on camera!
TopBunk is offline  
Old 24th Oct 2010, 19:08
  #10 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Warrington, UK
Posts: 3,840
Received 77 Likes on 32 Posts
In cruise, we may have 190 knots indicated, but be doing Mach .84. At another altitude, we may be showing 220 indicated, and still flying .84 Mach.
So given that those could be two different aircraft, both reporting .84 to ATC at different altitudes, would ATC be aware of the airspeed differential between the two, especially if they are on the same track/route?
MightyGem is offline  
Old 25th Oct 2010, 20:08
  #11 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Warrington, UK
Posts: 3,840
Received 77 Likes on 32 Posts
OK, thanks.
MightyGem is offline  
Old 2nd Nov 2010, 18:30
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: FL330
Posts: 235
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I P
C C
E D
T

-ectm+
+ectm- :d
One9iner is offline  
Old 2nd Nov 2010, 19:39
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: North America
Age: 64
Posts: 364
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'll give this a try.

MightyGem,

Did you get an answer?

I will try and make this simple without totally assaulting the topic. Most primary airspeed indicating instruments sample air pressure and convert the data into speed (how fast I am flying through the air-not over the ground). We use knots and miles per hour simply because of past practice and evolution of travel and they are the scales we are familiar with.


Ok simple enough, what happens when the jet flies up into the higher atmosphere where the air is much less dense? At some point simply measuring air pressure down the throat of an air sampling tube no longer yields as much useful information because the air is much less dense. (Remember this is a simplified explanation, so I am skipping the concept of static pressure).

The airspeed instrument is designed to display both knots and a Mach number, how fast I am flying in relation to the speed of sound under the current conditions.

The place where the sample ceases to display useful information called the cross over altitude, and it varies between airplanes types.

From the surface to this cross over altitude the instrument displays useful airspeed information in knots, and the pilots usually fly in knots. Above the cross over altitude the pilots pay more attention to the Mach number display as it reads tenths, hundredths and thousandths. The instrument will still function correctly but it is calibrated to display speed information differently at different altitudes.

At the higher altitudes ATC assigns mach numbers, as they are easier to fly because our display shows our Mach speeds in 3 digits. At altitude the airspeed needle may move a fraction of a distance, but it would be impossible for me to actually fly the extremely small variations. But I can easily read the 3 digits and make the necessary changes.

[Auto-throttles make all of this so much easier.]

Down lower in the atmosphere (below the cross over altitude) at the altitudes where the air is much denser the scale on my airspeed indicator is larger allowing me to see and fly airspeed in knots much easier. Mach number varies with temperature, so assigning two aircraft the same Mach number at different altitudes will likely not result in speeds being matched. So down lower in the atmosphere it is easier to assign airplanes airspeed in knots.

Hopefully you will find the above useful.

Respectfully,

Northbeach
Northbeach is offline  
Old 2nd Nov 2010, 21:31
  #14 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Warrington, UK
Posts: 3,840
Received 77 Likes on 32 Posts
Thanks, Northbeach, just the job.
MightyGem is offline  
Old 11th Nov 2010, 07:48
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: here and there
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hi,

I was thinking it could have to do with Vmo/Mmo,

consider an acft with
Vmo 350Kts and Mmo 0.84 that cruises at 0.82
climb speed: 310kts until crossover, 0.78 mach afterwards



During climb you should observe that the speed limit for the aircraft is first achieved in knots, rather than mach. to go near 0.84 at low altitude would totaly burst the 350 Knots as low as 20000 feet.

when you reach the crossover is when the chosen speeds encounter themselves and now you can fly mach because at a steady mach your knots will decrease
from that point you should observe your mach limitation, wich is now more easy to burst than the 350 knot

then you cruise at mach 0.82 and notice the airspeed has fallen to eg. 260 kts

so i believe this has to do with finding a way to keep airplane inside its limits.

just my 2 cents
shitzig is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.