Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Ground & Other Ops Forums > Questions
Reload this Page >

MEL or operation manual while taxiing......

Wikiposts
Search
Questions If you are a professional pilot or your work involves professional aviation please use this forum for questions. Enthusiasts, please use the 'Spectators Balcony' forum.

MEL or operation manual while taxiing......

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 5th Sep 2010, 13:04
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: inside of a pretty bustard
Age: 53
Posts: 263
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
MEL or operation manual while taxiing......

Hi,
I have a question ,if you are taxiing to holding point,following a failure of a part or system ,you use MEL or operation manual.......
Appreciate
airman13 is offline  
Old 5th Sep 2010, 13:49
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Arizona USA
Posts: 8,571
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
...you use MEL or operation manual
Ops manual and common sense.
However, I've noticed otherwise, by some sideways thinking individuals/companies.

Lets look at an example.
Three engine widebody airplane.
#1 IDG trips offline, and cannot be reset, whilst taxiing for takeoff.
Abnormal checklist completed, APU started, and left operating until 10,000 feet, as per procedures.

What not should be done, is returning to the stand, so engineering can put an 'inop' sticker on the panel and the defect recorded in the DD log.
And yet, I've seen pilots do just that...
411A is offline  
Old 5th Sep 2010, 13:52
  #3 (permalink)  
Gender Faculty Specialist
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Stop being so stupid, it's Sean's turn
Posts: 1,889
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
MEL use is for pre-departure. Not withstanding the fact that you may use it for reference whenever you like.

Ops manual, I guess you mean the QRH or emergency checklist, is to be used for everything else including failures on the ground.
Chesty Morgan is offline  
Old 5th Sep 2010, 15:39
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: on the golf course (Covid permitting)
Posts: 2,131
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I agree with Chesty with the proviso that it is worthwhile checking the MEL/CDL after running the QRH procedure(s) to see what the defect will have for the destination station. If you already at a main maintenance base where a fix can be made it may be the better option than taking the fault to a station with no spares and it becomes a no dispatch item.
TopBunk is offline  
Old 5th Sep 2010, 17:43
  #5 (permalink)  
Per Ardua ad Astraeus
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 18,579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
As Chesty/TB say, the wise pilot ( and we'll leave xxx out of this) will check the MEL if time permits since there can be some failures that may preclude departure from the destination.
BOAC is offline  
Old 5th Sep 2010, 19:45
  #6 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: inside of a pretty bustard
Age: 53
Posts: 263
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
because I saw in ATPL tests(JAA), the right answer was op. manual(QRH), but........some dozen questions later on, the right answer was MEL !!!! a little bit confused..........As for me, I agree with your opinion, MEL is necessary in order to decide go/no go, if some failures require maintenance at base only.
airman13 is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.