Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Ground & Other Ops Forums > Questions
Reload this Page >

ATPL question on the effect of weight on cruise level and airspeed

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Questions If you are a professional pilot or your work involves professional aviation please use this forum for questions. Enthusiasts, please use the 'Spectators Balcony' forum.

ATPL question on the effect of weight on cruise level and airspeed

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11th August 2008 | 10:08
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 116
Likes: 0
From: aussie land
ATPL question on the effect of weight on cruise level and airspeed

Hi, my ATPL text is a little bit confusing on this topic so I hope someone here can help to clear things up.

So far, I've learnt that max range is obtained at 1.32 Vimd and that the angle of attack where this is achieved is constant. So when fuel is burn off during cruise and the aircraft becomes lighter, in order to fly at 1.32 Vimd (and at constant angle of attack), the aircraft will need to fly slower at the same altitude. BUT, as an alternative to flying slower, a lighter aircraft can choose to climb and fly at a higher altitude.

So, my question is, when it chooses to do this, ie, climb to a higher altitude as a result of fuel burn off and becoming lighter, is this aircraft still flying at 1.32 Vimd and at the same IAS as it was before the climb?
JulieFlyGal is offline  
Reply
Old 11th August 2008 | 11:34
  #2 (permalink)  
Nemo Me Impune Lacessit
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 4,103
Likes: 5
From: Chabanais, France
Given that under most circumstances IAS will decrease with altitude if you maintain the same Mach # then no, if you maintain V1.32 Vimd then, at a greater altitude, subject to temperature, the IAS will be lower.

Use the example that the sound barrier will be broken at sea level at around 639knots, IAS, subject to temps and pressure but at altitude the barrier will be broken at a much less IAS.
parabellum is offline  
Reply
Old 12th August 2008 | 06:21
  #3 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 116
Likes: 0
From: aussie land
thank you kindly for your reply.
JulieFlyGal is offline  
Reply
Old 13th August 2008 | 20:48
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 478
Likes: 0
From: -------
Parabellum, you're confusing JulieFlyGal much more then he/she already was. If you read carefully the post, Mno is never mentioned, because in this situation Mno is not involved at all.
Vimd is a KIAS speed (all V-labeled speed are IAS/CAS/RAS/EAS).
For a lighter weight the Vimd is different, because the total drag curve is different (less weight, same parasite drag but different induced drag, the curve goes slightly to the left and Vimd a bit lower) and so Max range speed is also lower.AOA constant.

FB
Fullblast is offline  
Reply
Old 14th August 2008 | 00:57
  #5 (permalink)  
Nemo Me Impune Lacessit
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 4,103
Likes: 5
From: Chabanais, France
Sorry if I have confused you JulieFlyGal. Fullblast is correct, I have only considered Mno and not Vmin Drag.
parabellum is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.