Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Ground & Other Ops Forums > Questions
Reload this Page >

Crosswind limit "alarm" on pilot display

Wikiposts
Search
Questions If you are a professional pilot or your work involves professional aviation please use this forum for questions. Enthusiasts, please use the 'Spectators Balcony' forum.

Crosswind limit "alarm" on pilot display

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 7th Mar 2008, 13:23
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: London
Age: 55
Posts: 54
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Crosswind limit "alarm" on pilot display

Is there anyway that a display could sound an audible alarm on an approach if the crosswind component became over either your SOP limit or the aircraft limit?

I read that in crosswind landings pilots heads are buried down on the display looking at the wind constantly - surely you are checking just for busting limits rather than a constant changing figure? If you could preset an alarm to alert you that you are now over the limit it would save the head down approach whereas a head up all the time might be more beneficial as long as you knew when the limit had been crossed.

Of course the alarm would have to be set for direction of runway and only to activate at a certain height, but would it help?
Andy Rylance is offline  
Old 7th Mar 2008, 14:52
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: D(Emona)
Posts: 404
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 1 Post
This has been standard equipment for ages.. it's integrated in every precarious pilot!
Dufo is offline  
Old 7th Mar 2008, 17:14
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Europe
Posts: 292
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
To previous poster: Then you know nothing about windy conditions. I totally agree that an alarm would be ideal, but it would be highly impractical. As you get closer to ground, the wind will decrease. So, when should this system start to work? And what about gusts? I often see wind above limits till the last, say 2-300 feet. On the 737, I keep FMC prog page 2 open, just to have a glance before flare. But it's rarely of any use because if it's at limits you'll be quite busy and not having either guts, nor the capacity to look down.
RYR-738-JOCKEY is offline  
Old 7th Mar 2008, 17:55
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: The Gusto
Posts: 81
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Smile

...and RYR-738-thingy, you yourself know too little about kalman filtering, which is involved in bringing you the display on PROG 2, and means that you are not looking at a display of instant wind, in any case, but rather a weighted average of sensed (or derived) wind computed over an unspecified period of recent time.
Zorst is offline  
Old 7th Mar 2008, 19:10
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 2,451
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 5 Posts
The ideal place to measure the wind is on the ground near the runway, and at the same time calculate the crosswind component. These should be communicated to the crew who will compare the information with the operational limits, which should also include pilot experience, currency, etc.

The problem is that wind (like runway friction) is difficult to measure in a meaningful way for operators, thus crews have to interpret whatever information is available – reported wind, ATIS, forecast, trend, synoptic chart, etc. (Generally FMS / GPS are not good indicators of actual wind, they are ‘historic’ devices, being heavily lagged.)
The report below covers the essential aspects with some very meaningful conclusions which pilots could incorporate in their personal SOPs.
This is a MUST READ document for all pilots. ‘Safety aspects of aircraft operations in crosswind.’
safetypee is offline  
Old 7th Mar 2008, 20:08
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: The Gusto
Posts: 81
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'm pleased to see meneer van Es' work being given this worthwhile plaudit; those searching for 'bullet points' should consider the difference between 'surface wind' (standard ICAO two minute average with gusts) and 'instant wind', read straight from (one hopes) an appropriately-sited 10m anemometer.

However, in global terms, there's no point in discussing these niceties until operators decide whether gusts count or not. It's good aircraft design, good handling skills, and good fortune, that keep catastrophe at bay in gusting crosswinds at present.
Zorst is offline  
Old 13th Mar 2008, 19:51
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: in the mist
Posts: 562
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Very hard to be precise when measuring x-wind. Generally taking the last tower reported wind and comparing it in context with the ATIS and forecast is the best practise.

To get a precise wind readout at the touchdown zone at the precise moment the wheels touch the ground would really only serve useful for the nasty b&st%rd lawyer out to sue the pilot.

If the pilot is happy that the wind is within his/her aircraft limitations and his/her own capabilities and then flys an approach the best and most useful information then is a drift assesment combined with handling familiarity on that aircraft. Knowing how much rudder and aileron to apply in the flare to lead to success. I don't think an actual wind readout during the flare or just prior to the flare is as useful as pilot judgement.
TheGorrilla is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.