Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Ground & Other Ops Forums > Questions
Reload this Page >

Intoxicated? Incident - Test or not and Why?

Wikiposts
Search
Questions If you are a professional pilot or your work involves professional aviation please use this forum for questions. Enthusiasts, please use the 'Spectators Balcony' forum.

Intoxicated? Incident - Test or not and Why?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 3rd Mar 2008, 22:03
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: U.K.
Age: 68
Posts: 380
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Intoxicated? Incident - Test or not and Why?

It is generally accepted that if you are intoxicated or have been deliberately misusing illegal substances as an athlete or a public transport operator eg. a taxi driver, you can expect to be tested to find out exactly how much of the performance altering substance either is or is not in your system and which may have fundamentally caused an advantage or error.

Should pilots be automatically tested following a serious incident - if only to exclude this element as a possible factor?

To test or not to test? and if not, why not?

DB
Dream Buster is offline  
Old 3rd Mar 2008, 22:20
  #2 (permalink)  
M80
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: blank
Posts: 46
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Test

It should be done to eliminate that as a factor following all incidents. As long as testing is done sympathetically after an accident, it shouldn't be an issue.
M80 is offline  
Old 3rd Mar 2008, 22:33
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Camp X-Ray
Posts: 2,135
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I was under the impression it already is done. When a stationary BA jumbo got clobbered by a Sri Lankan aircraft recently the BA crew were all tested despite clearly not being at fault.
Hand Solo is offline  
Old 3rd Mar 2008, 23:05
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Watford
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What a waste of everyones time and money! How on earth does this testing take mankind any further forward? PC gone mad, again!
Just_Testing is offline  
Old 3rd Mar 2008, 23:32
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 398
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It happens already in the UK. Try having anything other than a normal day and the thought/drug/booze police will be there.
Bally Heck is offline  
Old 4th Mar 2008, 08:26
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: OZ
Posts: 1,129
Received 12 Likes on 6 Posts
Testing when there is "probable cause" is OK with me. Professional pilots ought to be ready for it. I expect a blood test in the event of a crash just to eliminate the possibility that I may be "impaired" by alcohol. It may be well argued that I am "impaired" by lack of alcohol, but that is a different story!!!

Being a certified "silly old bugger" now as I am over 60, I am very careful to not be over the prescribed BAC to fly.
I carry my own certified breath test machine and use it!!

Come on guy and girls, you always know if it's probable that you will be over .02.

So, I will report sick if I think that I will be over .02 at sign on - end of story. All the old hero stories of flying with spectacular hangovers etc. etc. are dopey **** and I am ashamed to add my name to the list - just stupid stuff. Don't do it!!! I will never do it again.
mustafagander is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.