Wikiposts
Search
Questions If you are a professional pilot or your work involves professional aviation please use this forum for questions. Enthusiasts, please use the 'Spectators Balcony' forum.

As an example...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 5th Jan 2008, 01:40
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
As an example...

Ok!

The other day one of our 757's had an engine failure. It was just after t/o. No idea how soon after but from what I can gather they hadn't climed past 4000ft when it happened.

Basically, an engine suffered some sort of surge. According to passengers there were some flames coming out the end and a big bang.

Anyway, I just the read the original ASR and it looks like the crew (luckily the PF was the Cpt so he was already in control) had just climbed through 4000ft when they heard a bang and their master caution flashed. They shut the engine down, circled to dump fuel, and then landed. Nobody was hurt but I want to know what would go in in a cockpit at that moment?

Say you're sitting there PM, watching the PIC, and all of a sudden you feel a shudder and hear a bang and the caution lights come on.

What do you do?

What goes on in the cockpit at that moment??
Deathrow558 is offline  
Old 5th Jan 2008, 07:18
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Oz
Posts: 311
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
Why such lack of faith in your F/Os??

There would be a flurry of oaths, followed by recall checklist items, reference checklist items, a bootful of rudder and probably a lovely landing at the end of it.

Then the worst part of all - the endless paperwork . . . .
esreverlluf is offline  
Old 5th Jan 2008, 09:22
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 146
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Suggest you try airliners.net. Alternatively, ask a pilot at "your" outfit.
HOMER SIMPSONS LOVECHILD is offline  
Old 5th Jan 2008, 10:05
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Behind You.....
Posts: 408
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
CRM.. cockpit resource management.
powerstall is offline  
Old 5th Jan 2008, 13:16
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Bournemouth UK
Age: 49
Posts: 863
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
(luckily the PF was the Cpt so he was already in control)
Phew, sounds like a close call.

Sky Wave is offline  
Old 5th Jan 2008, 13:36
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: France
Posts: 481
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Cool

Deathrow,

Why does someone who's in charge of manuals end up reading an ASR?

And then publishing material from it here?

BTW, PM and PIC are not opposites, and co-pilots are trained to handle emergencies.
frontlefthamster is offline  
Old 5th Jan 2008, 15:23
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: sweden
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Exactly

Mike Jenvey is absolutely right!
learrocket is offline  
Old 5th Jan 2008, 16:23
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: France
Posts: 481
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Cool

I'd make the cabin crew 5c and include instruction to them as to whether the landing is to be normal, precautionary, or planned emergency, and add:

5a Radio call to company advising them of the situation and perhaps asking for instructions or advice

5b Reassuring PA by captain explaining in very simple terms what has happened and what the plan is,

and I would comment that Mike is right to indicate that sometimes it's better for the captain to leave the co-pilot flying, or hand control to him, although at other times it's better for the captain to stay in control or take control, although of course some companies dictate that the captain (or commander) must take or retain control (qv Boeing procedures for emergency descent).

Given the perspective of the original questioner, we should also say that this is all carried out in the context of 'aviate, navigate, communicate'. Therefore, the first priority is always to fly the aircraft at the right speed and in the right configuration, the second is always to fly it in the right direction at the right altitude (this may introduce the complexity of an emergency turn, special engine out procedure, escape route, or the like, which may demand significant care and attention), and communication with ATC, cabin crew, or passengers is last in the list.

I'd still love to know how we're discussing confidential company information here... Does the DFO know that his ASRs get replicated on PPRuNE?
frontlefthamster is offline  
Old 5th Jan 2008, 16:28
  #9 (permalink)  
Mistrust in Management
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 973
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I think you may have misread the original ASR

circled to dump fuel
The B.757 does not have a fuel dumping facility. Perhaps they held whilst ensuring all the appropriate checks were completed.


Regards
Exeng
exeng is offline  
Old 5th Jan 2008, 18:28
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: La Belle Province
Posts: 2,179
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Could have been "circled to burn off fuel" rather than dump.
Mad (Flt) Scientist is offline  
Old 5th Jan 2008, 19:31
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: I wouldn't know.
Posts: 4,499
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
(qv Boeing procedures for emergency descent)
That changed though, didn't it? At least on our 737s it changed from allways being flown by the commander to being flown by the current PF.
Denti is offline  
Old 5th Jan 2008, 21:15
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: France
Posts: 481
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Arrow

It's company-specific.
frontlefthamster is offline  
Old 5th Jan 2008, 21:27
  #13 (permalink)  
Buttonpusher
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Bloody Hell
Age: 65
Posts: 448
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
What goes on in the cockpit at that moment??
The term "Half crown...... sixpence" comes to mind...

That and the QRH.
FLCH is offline  
Old 6th Jan 2008, 19:07
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: UTC +8
Posts: 2,626
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Engine failure scenarios are trained and flown; retrained and reflown every six months in the sim. In the airplane, an engine failure is also included in the take-off briefing; so there is no desperation and no panic among crewmembers during an actual engine failure, engine fire, or engine "bang."
GlueBall is offline  
Old 8th Jan 2008, 22:06
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 2,527
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Deathrow,

FO's are perfectly capable of handling emergencies. They wouldn't make it past the simulator phase of training if they were unable. In fact, at least one major carrier in the US stipulates that the FO will be the pilot flying in case of an emergency.

This makes it easier for the captain to go make the decisions, and I suppose the radio communication will be a teeny bit faster, which could be critical in a few situations. From what I'm told, a few pilots were skeptical at first, because it goes against the grain of what we've commonly been taught, but they find that it works very well. Never done it myself, but I have to say that the theory does make quite a bit of sense.
Check Airman is online now  
Old 8th Jan 2008, 22:10
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 2,527
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Almost right Mike Jenvey, but you forgot the very first thing in such a scenario, and that's to make the right callout:


0. Utter an appropriate expletive, for example:

oh
what the
religious deity of your choice

1. Identify the problem.
2. Confirm the problem - both pilots.
3. Handling pilot would instruct non-handling pilot to carry out appropriate emergency or abnormal check-list action - monitored/confirmed by handling pilot.

I agree with everything else

Under these SOP's though the before takeoff checklist must include "PA....OFF"
Check Airman is online now  
Old 8th Jan 2008, 22:26
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: West Yorkshire Zone
Posts: 976
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Why such lack of faith in your F/Os??

There would be a flurry of oaths, followed by recall checklist items, reference checklist items, a bootful of rudder and probably a lovely landing at the end of it.

Then the worst part of all - the endless paperwork . . . .


I like it 'A Bootful of Rudder' lol lol lol
BYALPHAINDIA is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.