Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Ground & Other Ops Forums > Questions
Reload this Page >

what are the main differences between Boeing and Airbus ?

Wikiposts
Search
Questions If you are a professional pilot or your work involves professional aviation please use this forum for questions. Enthusiasts, please use the 'Spectators Balcony' forum.

what are the main differences between Boeing and Airbus ?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 27th Nov 2007, 12:04
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: stockholm
Age: 42
Posts: 38
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
what are the main differences between Boeing and Airbus ?

what are the main differences between Boeing and Airbus ?



Cheers,
cool_pilot is offline  
Old 27th Nov 2007, 12:12
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Hoylake
Age: 50
Posts: 414
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
This is a forum for flight training.
Can I suggest the Boeing and Airbus websites to you for this info.

http://www.boeing.com/commercial/

http://www.airbus.com/en/aircraftfamilies/

But the main difference is its easier to read the paper in an airbus
Nearly There is offline  
Old 27th Nov 2007, 12:16
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: South Wales
Age: 42
Posts: 829
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boeing

Produce:
Commercial airliners
Military aircraft
Munitions
Space systems
Computer Services


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Airbus

Only Produce:
Commercial airliners


Should be plenty of info on there for you? Not a very specific question so I presume it's just a general question?
AlphaMale is offline  
Old 27th Nov 2007, 12:19
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Victoria
Posts: 1,483
Received 6 Likes on 3 Posts
So the Airbus 400M isnt a military aircraft, then?
Lasiorhinus is offline  
Old 27th Nov 2007, 12:25
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: South Wales
Age: 42
Posts: 829
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well ... I forgot about that . Ofcourse I could be picky and say that Airbus Military SL produce the A400M and not Airbus S.A.S. (grabbing at a life line).


I didn't write wikipedia, I simply supply the links.
AlphaMale is offline  
Old 27th Nov 2007, 12:33
  #6 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: stockholm
Age: 42
Posts: 38
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
thanks alot Alphamale....I guess it sounded like a general question, but i thought if I could find technical answers about the differences between the two as in terms of operation of the aircraft....
cool_pilot is offline  
Old 27th Nov 2007, 12:37
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: UK
Posts: 1,608
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Are you looking to do a type rating?

I'm struggling as to why you would otherwise ask such as question on this forum, but you don't even specify type...quite a few differences even between same manufacturer types...
Re-Heat is offline  
Old 27th Nov 2007, 12:43
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 657
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Not a very specifc question. Do you mean difference in organisation? market place/share? products? ethos/culture? finance? politcal structure?

From a flight crew perspective, both produce highly automated flight decks, but boeing put the stick in the middle (where it should be) and airbus to the side. It would appear as well, that boeing put more trust in the pilot to do the right thing at the right time within reason, whereas airbus a/craft are 'trained' to bite if crew step out of line.

Also, boeing produce much more attractive a/craft - B787 v A380? No contest.
Parson is offline  
Old 27th Nov 2007, 12:43
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: エリア88
Posts: 1,031
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The main difference is, modern Airbus aircraft have very similar cockpits from the smallest A318 to the mighty A380 so pilot training time between the types is reduced. Where as Boeing aircraft are generally different between each type so pilot's must go through more training to prepare them on to a larger Boeing aircraft.

You might start to see people arguing that one type is better than the other but these people generally don't fly aircraft and need to get out more.
Mercenary Pilot is offline  
Old 27th Nov 2007, 13:33
  #10 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: stockholm
Age: 42
Posts: 38
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thank you Mercenary Pilot.

@ Parson > Thank you Sir. I am looking for a flight crew perspective obviously. Something similar to what Mercenary Pilot came up with.

@ Re Heat > I am not going to do a type rating on anyone of them, but I was just interested over the major technical differences between them.: )

cheers
cool_pilot is offline  
Old 27th Nov 2007, 15:57
  #11 (permalink)  
Registered User **
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Tokyo, Japan
Posts: 149
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Simple: on an Airbus, if you fall asleep, the aircraft will land alone, on a Boeing, unless you tell him to land during your sleep, it won't.

It's a question of automation and philosophy: Airbus aircraft are built around the computer. Boeing aircraft have a computer attached to the machine. Both philosophies have proven to be good, and both have their limits.

None of both is better, it's up to each pilot.

One pilot likes brunettes, another prefers blondies.
The question is which is the blond one? Airbus or Boeing?
Nichibei Aviation is offline  
Old 27th Nov 2007, 22:26
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: In the countyside
Posts: 138
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Currently on the Airbus but much prefer the Boeing from a pilots point of view. From a passenger point of view I would prefer the Airbus. The FMS computer far more user friendly on the Boeing than the MCDU on the airbus. Lights out concept on the Airbus is very smart though along with the ECAM display of checklists when things go wrong.
Lord Lardy is offline  
Old 27th Nov 2007, 22:35
  #13 (permalink)  
v6g
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Canada
Age: 46
Posts: 253
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Nichibei Aviation
Simple: on an Airbus, if you fall asleep, the aircraft will land alone, on a Boeing, unless you tell him to land during your sleep, it won't.
... and people wonder why pilot salaries are in long-term decline.
v6g is offline  
Old 28th Nov 2007, 16:12
  #14 (permalink)  
Spitoon
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Just to help the thread creep along a bit....

I've always assumed that the reasons that pilot salaries are in decline is because it takes so long to train a pilot to push that button.

But I'm just a simple controller. And I've just sat through a bunch of presentations about how the computers are going to tell me how to control aeroplanes soon. Looks like my days of wanging the planes round the sky will be coming to an end soon - in Europe anyway. Thank heaven for retirement - I should just beat the next wave of automation!
 
Old 29th Nov 2007, 09:44
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Netherlands
Age: 41
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
yoke (Boeing) vs sidestick (Airbus)
clown82 is offline  
Old 29th Nov 2007, 21:40
  #16 (permalink)  

Beacon Outbound
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: "Home is were the answer machine is"
Posts: 693
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
yoke (Boeing) vs sidestick (Airbus)
What makes you think every 'bus has a sidestick?

The main difference is that the one starts with an 'A', and the other with a 'B'.

As far as basic aerodynamics and principles of flight are concerned I think you'll find they are pretty similar.
IRRenewal is online now  
Old 30th Nov 2007, 08:54
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Europe
Posts: 1,416
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
One manufacturer relies heavily on direct and indirect subsidies from Government and admits it because it's public domain stuff, and the other manufacturer relies heavily on direct and indirect subsidies from Government, denies it because it's not public domain stuff, and accuses the other one of relying heavily....etc etc.
Capot is offline  
Old 30th Nov 2007, 09:35
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: inside of a pretty bustard
Age: 53
Posts: 263
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Airbus are made for engineers
Boeings are made for pilots
airman13 is offline  
Old 30th Nov 2007, 14:01
  #19 (permalink)  
PPRuNe supporter
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 1,677
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Simple: on an Airbus, if you fall asleep, the aircraft will land alone, on a Boeing, unless you tell him to land during your sleep, it won't.
Please explain, I fly an Airbus and must make it descend, I was under the impression that some Boeing A/P's could be programmed to begin the descent automatically, thanks.
Dream Land is offline  
Old 30th Nov 2007, 16:11
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: USA
Posts: 58
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Talking

Airbus are made for engineers
Boeings are made for pilots


Ain't that the TRUTH!!!!
Capt.Tentacles is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.