newbie question about minimum gross gradients by engine failure
![](/images/avatars/th_new.gif)
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Germany
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
newbie question about minimum gross gradients by engine failure
Hello,
I'm a engineering student in germany having his first exam about aircrafts, so please apologise if the question is too stupid.
I have the table for minimum gross gradients by engine failure and it says
engines .........2............3........... 4
1.Segment.....0%........0.3%.......0.5%
2.Segment....2.4%.......2.7%.......3.0%
3.Segment....1.2%......1.5%........1.7%
I don't understand this table. Why is it, that with more engines you need a higher climb rate?
thanks in advance
I'm a engineering student in germany having his first exam about aircrafts, so please apologise if the question is too stupid.
I have the table for minimum gross gradients by engine failure and it says
engines .........2............3........... 4
1.Segment.....0%........0.3%.......0.5%
2.Segment....2.4%.......2.7%.......3.0%
3.Segment....1.2%......1.5%........1.7%
I don't understand this table. Why is it, that with more engines you need a higher climb rate?
thanks in advance
Last edited by quiquehsu; 21st Aug 2007 at 00:32.
Warning Toxic!
Disgusted of Tunbridge
Disgusted of Tunbridge
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Hampshire, UK
Posts: 4,011
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Interesting! I would say that with 4 engines, you are twice as likely to have an engine failure, and you will be heavier as you are a longhaul aeroplane, therefore the minimum margin is increased. Think: 2 engined A330 and 4 engined A340, much heavier.
In practice, better to have an engine failure on a twin than a 4 engined aeroplane as the thrust/weight ratio is higher. Therefore twins climb out more steeply than 4 engined heavy aeroplanes.
In practice, better to have an engine failure on a twin than a 4 engined aeroplane as the thrust/weight ratio is higher. Therefore twins climb out more steeply than 4 engined heavy aeroplanes.