Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Ground & Other Ops Forums > Questions
Reload this Page >

Today's BA8046 Jersey-Gatwick

Wikiposts
Search
Questions If you are a professional pilot or your work involves professional aviation please use this forum for questions. Enthusiasts, please use the 'Spectators Balcony' forum.

Today's BA8046 Jersey-Gatwick

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 27th Jul 2007, 15:50
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Today's BA8046 Jersey-Gatwick

I had a call from a pax onboard to tell me they had a full emergency into LGW this afternoon. Crew were all called forward to the Cockpit to have the situation explained, 737 landed with all services on standby. He asked me if anyone knew what the incident could have been about. As you can tell from my lack of technical language, I am no expert in such things! He wondered if it was flap problem, made initial approach and quite late aborted landing
Mardavi is offline  
Old 27th Jul 2007, 16:00
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Cloud 9
Posts: 2,948
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Would not have been attempting to land during an initial approach, a landing normally takes place after a final approach
Phileas Fogg is offline  
Old 27th Jul 2007, 16:15
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: U and K
Posts: 310
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If you had a call from one of the passenger's on this actual flight, why the hell didn't they ask the 2 drivers what happened !?
ABO944 is offline  
Old 27th Jul 2007, 16:29
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Germany
Posts: 175
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
not everyone dares to trouble the 2 drivers who - one thinks - had just trouble enough

well, at least I wouldn't...
the_hawk is offline  
Old 27th Jul 2007, 19:09
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: 52N 20E
Posts: 713
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I agree, I wouldn't want to upset the Cheese Board on short finals.
Smokie is offline  
Old 27th Jul 2007, 20:10
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Isle Du Cyber
Posts: 933
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Don,t call them drivers, I did so one day many years ago a good a full scale telling off.
We are PILOTS.
GBALU53 is offline  
Old 28th Jul 2007, 01:14
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Cloud 9
Posts: 2,948
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
BA B737's have air phones? Last time I was on one the seat was knackered, never mind being able to call for seatsRus
Phileas Fogg is offline  
Old 6th Aug 2007, 15:46
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Isle Du Cyber
Posts: 933
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Flapless Landings

What can one say if only the papers found out more information and then told the public.
Meaning pilot have regular checks and land an aircraft flapless could well be one of these.
Also why the reason the aircraft could not land in Jersey was the runway was not long enough for a flapless landing.
They ommited to say that there is no problem with landing with out the flaps and adding the aircraft touch down speed is higher and the land roll longer, instead of giving Joe and his pulic the fright of there life with only half a story.
GBALU53 is offline  
Old 6th Aug 2007, 20:04
  #9 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thumbs up BA in a flap

Well yes actually the incident referred to in the JEP is related. It was another flight but BA have now confirmed in this evenings newspaper that in fact it was the same aircraft involved in both incidents. The newspaper has rather sensationalised the event of course however the slight concern is that it should be the same aircraft. Glad to see in this evenings newspaper that BA reckon to have mended it....thats good!
Mardavi is offline  
Old 6th Aug 2007, 20:08
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Leeds, UK
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
there's more

From today's JEP:

http://www.thisisjersey.com/news/news3.html?06/08/07-BA%20plane%20'had%20similar%20fault'%20twice%20in%20a%20week

They now seem to be inclining that there was some sort of negligence on the part of BA and that lives were put in danger.

Again, they reiterate the passengers had 'hands held across the aisle as panic swept through the cabin', yet fail to add that a flapless landing at Gatwick is actually not that big a deal.

News comes slowly in Jersey, I suppose they have to sell papers somehow...
jordan24e is offline  
Old 9th Aug 2007, 22:36
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The journalist was Harry Mc Randle aka Harry Mc Scandle - why don't u guys write to the editor and complain about this sensationalist journalism - I knowI [email protected] ( the ed)
fredfred is offline  
Old 10th Aug 2007, 06:44
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Isle Du Cyber
Posts: 933
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Angel Reply to the Local Rag Story

Two letters appeared in the local rag from two well known local commercial pilots two nights ago.

The letters gave the full story and shot Mc Scandel down in flames.

If Mc Scandel is an Aviation Journelist it should take up flying then he might understand things better before putting a load of rubbish down on paper and making a stupid story a full page spread.

It just goes to show how much junk is put into any paper to sell them.

You do not want to have these type stories that can put people off.
GBALU53 is offline  
Old 11th Aug 2007, 00:08
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: uk
Posts: 951
Received 18 Likes on 12 Posts
MacRandle has been writing rubbish about aviation for years. I cannot understand why they keep him on. He has to be the most ill-informed aviation hack in Europe.
old,not bold is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.