Wikiposts
Search
Questions If you are a professional pilot or your work involves professional aviation please use this forum for questions. Enthusiasts, please use the 'Spectators Balcony' forum.

RVR

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 25th Mar 2007, 22:47
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: NW
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
RVR

Can someone direct me to the defining paragraph in JAR OPS or elswhere? that states that the controlling RVR for Cat 1 may be the touchdown and mid and end may be 150 meters ? If the whole runway is not required for landing.
JUSTWANTTOFLY is offline  
Old 26th Mar 2007, 17:50
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Hants, UK
Posts: 1,064
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
See my reply to your similar post on the ATC Issues forum.
eyeinthesky is offline  
Old 21st Apr 2007, 15:49
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: UK
Posts: 111
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Rainboe, I believe you are incorrect. If reported and relevant you must respect midpoint and stopend limits.

JAR-OPS 1.405 Commencement and continuation of approach

(a) The commander or the pilot to whom conduct of the flight has been delegated may commence an instrument approach regardless of the reported RVR/Visibility but the approach shall not be continued beyond the outer marker, or equivalent position, if the reported RVR/visibility is less than the applicable minima. (See IEM OPS 1.405(a).)

(f) The touch-down zone RVR is always controlling. If reported and relevant, the mid point and stop end RVR are also controlling. The
minimum RVR value for the mid-point is 125 m or the RVR required for the touch-down zone if less, and 75 m for the stop-end. For aeroplanes equipped
with a roll-out guidance or control system, the minimum RVR value for the mid-point is 75 m.

Note. “Relevant”, in this context, means that part of the runway used during the high speed phase of the landing down to a speed of approximately 60 knots.
Winston is offline  
Old 22nd Apr 2007, 22:14
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: UK
Posts: 56
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I agree with Winston. JAR OPS 1.405 applies to all approaches, not just Cat III. If you are given mid point and stop end RVR's you now have to take them into account.
Silvershadow is offline  
Old 23rd Apr 2007, 13:12
  #5 (permalink)  
Per Ardua ad Astraeus
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 18,579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
1) I guess if the vis is that bad, the airfield will be operating 'low vis' in which case mid and stop-end RVRs (if available) will be given?

2) The only 'controllling' mid-point RVR I am aware of (CatI) is 75m or less, and same for stop-end, but ONLY if the latter is specified in the Company Ops manual - which it ain't
BOAC is offline  
Old 24th Apr 2007, 23:02
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Scandinavia
Posts: 79
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Below is a part of our OM-A for Cat I approaches:

If more than one RVR value is given for the same runway, the RVR at the threshold determines the minima for landing. The additional values shall be used as a guidance.
For me JAR OPS can state whatever, our OM-A is quite clear on this
Fellow Aviator is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.