Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Ground & Other Ops Forums > Questions
Reload this Page >

High speed below FL100, why or why not?

Wikiposts
Search
Questions If you are a professional pilot or your work involves professional aviation please use this forum for questions. Enthusiasts, please use the 'Spectators Balcony' forum.

High speed below FL100, why or why not?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 19th Mar 2007, 07:50
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
High speed below FL100, why or why not?

Hello all,

What are your opinions with regards to (planning) a high speed descend profile, including high speed below FL100, ie. 330kts till 3000ft? And as well high speed climb, (accelerating at 5000ft or below)....

What are the pro's and con's? I can think of a few myself but i'm curious to what others think. What does your SOP say?

Any documented facts with regards to time saving, fuel economy, airframe stress, bird strike risk etc? Personally I don't like high speed below FL100, during descend nor climb.
Regards,
AV8R
AV8R-77 is offline  
Old 19th Mar 2007, 10:03
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Ryanairland
Posts: 42
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
For me the biggest consideration is VFR traffic. If there is an excellent radar service then high speed is less of a risk, especially in class A,B and C airspace. If there are generally high levels of VFR traffic where you operate below FL100 it's just not worth the risk, time/fuel savings be dammed.
See also
http://www.pprune.org/forums/showthr...hreadid=125808
richarjm is offline  
Old 19th Mar 2007, 11:50
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Moon
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
um, you get there quicker . F#ck it - I am not paying for the gas!
Fatter Bastard is offline  
Old 19th Mar 2007, 15:29
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Hants, UK
Posts: 1,064
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Aren't some windscreens only certified for bird strike tolerance up to a certain IAS? (BA146 for example) The suggestion would therefore be that you are more likely to suffer a bird strike below FL100, so you need to stay below the certified speed unless you fancy wearing a seagull as a necklace...



Having said that, the mil are exempt from the speed restriction. What is the certified strength of the average canopy?
eyeinthesky is offline  
Old 20th Mar 2007, 02:11
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Arizona USA
Posts: 8,571
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Personaaly noticed at Khartoum, some years ago, parked on the ramp.
An Ethiopian B727, that suffered a birdstrike at 4000agl, while doing 340 KIAS.
The bird ( a big buzzard I think) went thru the radome, forward pressure bulkhead, broke the First officers left leg, went thru the FD door, and what was left of the bird was splattered all over the first class lounge, just aft of the forward galley.
Not a pretty sight.
Leave the fast below 10 to the military jet jocks.
411A is offline  
Old 20th Mar 2007, 02:51
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: La Belle Province
Posts: 2,179
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
the mil are exempt from the speed restriction. What is the certified strength of the average canopy?
Considerably greater than for a civil transport category aircraft.

Take a look at a FJ forward windscreen. The one on Hawk is about 1.5 inches thick IIRC - and in the birdstrike tests it deformed so much that there was a fear it would strike the HUD when fitted. It's not WW2-style armoured glass against enemy bullets any more, it's for birdstrike.

(Hawk was about 600kts, IIRC - 4 times the typical commerical impact energy levels)
Mad (Flt) Scientist is offline  
Old 20th Mar 2007, 13:44
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 3,982
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
One thing about "high" speed descents is they are less economical from a fuel point of view! Some pilots are under the misconception that staying high in the cruise for longer and then descending high speed will save fuel - this is not the case! It may reduce tech log time so there is an issue with maintenance costs etc but this is the idea of having a cost index on the fmc which will give you the "ECON" speeds which balance fuel burn against time in the air.

Hope this helps - fly safe!
fireflybob is offline  
Old 22nd Mar 2007, 12:09
  #8 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks for the input all.
Basically my reasons for keeping the speed below 250 below FL100 are all mentioned.

VFR traffic close to airfields, bird strike risk on the window, fuel economy. Like fireflybob mentioned, a common misconception that high speed saves fuel. Not possible.......

I hear often that "you will get there faster" now I believe the difference between standard speed and high speed would be less then a minute (unless atc requires an early descend). Now, just about one minute earlier on the ground, is that worth the risks mentioned?

As well you might have a ROD which could exceed 3000ft/min within 3000ft on MSA.
AV8R-77 is offline  
Old 24th Mar 2007, 02:39
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Canada
Posts: 349
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
A note on windshield bird strikes:

FAR 25 aircraft (transport category) windshields have to be able to withstand impact of one 4 pound bird, without penetration, at design cruise speed.

Eagles, cranes, geese, and loons all average at least double this weight.
ahramin is offline  
Old 25th Mar 2007, 18:12
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Europe-the sunshine side
Posts: 755
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
and design cruise speed will be? ....IAS around 250 kts?....for sure not Vmo
Do a search with 767 ,CDG ,bird strike and you'll see how a small bird can depressurize a big plane,when doing more than 300 kt..
alexban is offline  
Old 30th Mar 2007, 00:19
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Sussex
Age: 49
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Straying from the Ornithological message for a second: If you plan for 250 below ten (or less in some places depending on Local standard speeds), you reduce your chances of being left hot and high if ATC cut your track miles to run at the last minute.
Threethirteen is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.