Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Ground & Other Ops Forums > Questions
Reload this Page >

Question re Embraer RJ's

Wikiposts
Search
Questions If you are a professional pilot or your work involves professional aviation please use this forum for questions. Enthusiasts, please use the 'Spectators Balcony' forum.

Question re Embraer RJ's

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 21st Jan 2007, 19:20
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: LPFL
Age: 60
Posts: 83
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Question re Embraer RJ's

Could any of the ERJ's operate off a 1,400 metre (4,950 feet) runway fully laden with enough fuel for a 1,100 nm sector? (Assume said runway is at sea level and standard temp. and pressure.)

Indeed, could any regional airliner (jet or prop)?

Thanks for any replies.

M63
Midland63 is offline  
Old 22nd Jan 2007, 11:20
  #2 (permalink)  
PGA
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Europe
Posts: 252
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Depends which ERJ you mean...? The 145 definately can`t
PGA is online now  
Old 22nd Jan 2007, 11:41
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Ireland
Posts: 1,621
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Midland63
Indeed, could any regional airliner (jet or prop)?
M63
I believe the ATR42/72 could, but with some payload limitations.
Cyrano is offline  
Old 26th Jan 2007, 00:02
  #4 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: LPFL
Age: 60
Posts: 83
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks for replies guys.

PGA - I meant any of the ERJ's. If not the 145, any of the others?

Cyrano - Do you think an ATR could do it with a p/l limitation which wouldn't make an operator deem it totally unprofitable? (i.e. if limited to - say - 25-30 pax - would it be totally unprofitable over 1,100nm sector?)

If you look at my "Location" you may work out where I'm coming from!

Thanks for your feedback - any more welcomed.

M63
Midland63 is offline  
Old 26th Jan 2007, 12:48
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Europe
Posts: 148
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My Big Book Of Airfield Codes has a big gap where LPFL should be but I may be able to help. Do have any obstacles to provide a challenge or is it nice and clear? PM me and let's see.
Saman
saman is offline  
Old 26th Jan 2007, 16:06
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Ireland
Posts: 1,621
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Midland63
Cyrano - Do you think an ATR could do it with a p/l limitation which wouldn't make an operator deem it totally unprofitable? (i.e. if limited to - say - 25-30 pax - would it be totally unprofitable over 1,100nm sector?)
Bom dia Midland63 (assuming my ICAO lookup is correct)!

Page 5 of this ATR-72 brochure has a payload-range chart and some information about field requirements which may help. IMHO it doesn't look as though the field length is too limiting for your application.

Hope that helps! (It'd be a long sector time in an ATR, though - if you're evaluating props, have you considered a Q400?)

Brgds
C.
Cyrano is offline  
Old 28th Jan 2007, 19:07
  #7 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: LPFL
Age: 60
Posts: 83
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Muito obrigado, Cyrano, tens razao!

Yes, I believe SATA Air Acores are looking at the Q400 to replace their BAe ATP's.

M63
Midland63 is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.