Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Ground & Other Ops Forums > Questions
Reload this Page >

Inflight Emergency - Land at all cost?

Wikiposts
Search
Questions If you are a professional pilot or your work involves professional aviation please use this forum for questions. Enthusiasts, please use the 'Spectators Balcony' forum.

Inflight Emergency - Land at all cost?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 27th Jan 2007, 07:20
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: UK
Age: 52
Posts: 293
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I would be tempted to ask for the fire services to thermally image the holds.

[Note: they must not open the holds with pax on board]
Something the Brussels fire service would do well to consider after recently not exactly covering themselve in glory after a A320 diverted in there en route FRA with Cargo fire warning!
Sean Dell is offline  
Old 30th Jan 2007, 02:43
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Sale, Australia
Age: 80
Posts: 3,832
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The fatal Swiss MD-11 off Halifax gives you all the answers you need. The records are replete with fires (anothers that comes to mind is a DC-9 in the US with a fire in the toilet that the crew got on the ground JUST in time - hull burnt out on ground, also recent FEDEX MD-11 inflight fire, safe landing and burnt out on ground). You made the only decision that could be made in the circumstances IMHO.
Brian Abraham is offline  
Old 30th Jan 2007, 05:49
  #23 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks for your replies.

Would greatly appreciate any more feedback since we can all learn.
Vibrant is offline  
Old 2nd Feb 2007, 18:43
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 3,218
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What is burning (eg, dangerous goods or someone's luggage) isn't relevant to your decision to get on the ground. You should never rush, even in a fire (especially in a fire)...but you should also not delay.

You're not going down to fight the fire, you're going somewhere to get stopped and egress. Knowing what you have in the way of hazardous cargo is important, but academic, and should have no bearing on your inflight decisions regarding a fire warning.
SNS3Guppy is offline  
Old 2nd Feb 2007, 20:14
  #25 (permalink)  
Warning Toxic!
Disgusted of Tunbridge
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Hampshire, UK
Posts: 4,011
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Right, we've established the right thing to do is get yer ass on the ground as soon ass possible without crashing due to haste. But....what to do once there? Bear in mind my comment that every evacuation results in broken bones, at least one serious injury and many minor ones (broken wrists and other bones). You have, say, a fire warning going, with no other indications of fire- no reports of hot floors, external smoke from the tower......what to do? I think sit on your hands for a moment, get reports from the cabin and ATC and fireman if poss, and hold your horses.
Rainboe is offline  
Old 3rd Feb 2007, 05:03
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: On Earth
Posts: 77
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Whether to order an evacuation is indeed subjective, especially with a cargo fire.

I tend to agree with Rainboe and TopBunk and pause before evacuating. As rightly said it all depends on the feedback received and at which airport one is. Very good CRM and communication is needed.
Boeing 777-300ER is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.