Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Ground & Other Ops Forums > Questions
Reload this Page >

Choosing Between Airbus and Boeing

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Questions If you are a professional pilot or your work involves professional aviation please use this forum for questions. Enthusiasts, please use the 'Spectators Balcony' forum.

Choosing Between Airbus and Boeing

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 9th August 2006 | 17:22
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
From: Scotland
Airbus and Boeing - The Differences?

I've always wondered how a commercial pilot chooses between training for Airbus or Boeing aircraft. Is it down to personal preference or likely job opportunities?

Last edited by fly_high; 11th August 2006 at 23:14. Reason: Thread has evolved past original question and title.
fly_high is offline  
Old 9th August 2006 | 17:43
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 140
Likes: 0
From: UK
choice???

I think you would be very lucky to find yourself in a position where you have such a luxury.

Its more a case of take what your given im afraid, if your lucky to be given anything!

Its a matter of company/OPs requirements really. If they have you on an A320 TR course, its becasue they needed pilots for that fleet yesterday
dlav is offline  
Old 9th August 2006 | 17:46
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 48
Likes: 0
From: In two, very different worlds
When I saw this post title I looked at it, sincerely hoping it wasnt someone who wanted advice on which one to CHOOSE!! Dude - ye take what you can get. You could end up flying both at various stages in your career!
WTL
Walk the line is offline  
Old 9th August 2006 | 18:07
  #4 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
From: Scotland
I suppose I didn't phrase that question awfully well.

What I was meaning was, given a choice would people prefer the Airbus set-up or the Bowing way or do they not have a preference.

And if you've trained on, say, a Boeing 737 and then convert on to an Airbus, is it difficult to get used to the joy-stick having previously had both hands on the controls (so to speak)?
fly_high is offline  
Old 9th August 2006 | 18:28
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 173
Likes: 0
From: between the books
It really depends on each and every individual.

Personally I'd prefer Boeing rather than Airbus, but the vast majority of airline pilots prefer Airbus (less demanding than Boeing).

Boeing is a more hands-on-job type of aircraft rather than the more poshy airbus... but still, I know an airbus pilot who says that this argument is completely wrong.

Don't worry about Airbus or Boeing... when you start flying yourself, you'll surely realise that even a small twin prop will do!! (at least in my case).
PPL152 is offline  
Old 11th August 2006 | 10:26
  #6 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 1,424
Likes: 34
From: London,England
Once you have been doing it a while the type becomes far less important than the life style or job attached to it. People argue endlessly about Airbus/Boeing etc etc. but the truth is that all modern airliners are lovely aircraft to operate and do a days work in so much more important to end up in the right company, area or type of job.
Max Angle is offline  
Old 11th August 2006 | 12:35
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 2,627
Likes: 2
From: UTC +8
Angel

..The one with four [4] motors and eighteen [18] wheels
GlueBall is offline  
Old 11th August 2006 | 16:19
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 178
Likes: 0
From: in da 'pit
If I had a choice it would be Boeing, having said that, I fly the 320 and it is the nicest a/c I have hand flown, the stick is fantastic. Lucky pilots get to have a go at both.
skywaytoheaven is offline  
Old 11th August 2006 | 17:11
  #9 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 317
Likes: 91
From: Honolulu
It all eventually comes down to the highest pay with the most time off-thats how you choose.
Junkflyer is online now  
Old 11th August 2006 | 17:17
  #10 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 1,450
Likes: 5
From: UK
Conversion to sidestick takes no time at all and the Airbus is generally a fairly comfortable place to spend a long day. More importantly, it has foot rests and a table for thosedelicious club meals
Megaton is offline  
Old 11th August 2006 | 23:01
  #11 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
From: Scotland
An observation that's crossed my mind regarding the Airbus set-up...

If the majority of people are right-handed (and often this hand is the dominant one) and start out as a FO then they will be sitting on the right and using their right hand to control the stick.

When they become Captain and move over to the left, then they will be using a different (and possibly weaker) hand.

Does this change have any affect at all?
fly_high is offline  
Old 12th August 2006 | 00:09
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 278
Likes: 0
From: NY
I'll give my PREFERENCE IN THE FORM OF A HINT ... I AIN'T GOING

rhov
rhovsquared is offline  
Old 12th August 2006 | 03:09
  #13 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL
Posts: 279
Likes: 17
From: Europe
@ fly_high

Does this change have any affect at all?
Not having done the move from the right to the left hand seat yet, I can only speak from my experience during flight training.

I am right handed, but during flight training at flight school several year ago, we used to fly the aircraft from the left hand seat (with the 'weaker hand' in my case). I had no problems at all doing this, so I think it is just a question of practice.

Most Captains I fly with are right handed, but have no problems flying the aircraft with their 'weak hand'

Regards,
DBate
DBate is offline  
Old 14th August 2006 | 13:21
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,843
Likes: 0
From: Australia
Originally Posted by fly_high
An observation that's crossed my mind regarding the Airbus set-up...

If the majority of people are right-handed (and often this hand is the dominant one) and start out as a FO then they will be sitting on the right and using their right hand to control the stick.

When they become Captain and move over to the left, then they will be using a different (and possibly weaker) hand.

Does this change have any affect at all?
Ummm....... side stick or no side stick, Airbus set-up or whatever, when I've changed from the right to the left seat in 20 or so airline aircraft with "conventional" controls, I always flew with my right hand and operated the power/thrust with my left hand whilst in the right seat, and always flew with my left hand and operated the power/thrust with my right hand whilst in the left seat. Wherein lies the problem, it has nothing to do with the "Airbus System".

Regards,

Old Smokey
Old Smokey is offline  
Old 17th August 2006 | 18:26
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 755
Likes: 0
From: Europe-the sunshine side
I'm a cpt with 4000+ hrs on the 737(C&NG),and I've had to refuse a proposal from my company to go to the A320,just few days ago.I'm very sad about this,but the 5yrs/70000 euro's bond seamed a bit high for a 320 transition.I would've been tied to the company,and with a paycheck around 3000 euros/month.....what would you've done?
I love my boby ,but I would've liked to have a check of the bus.
Well,maybe the dreamliner it's next on line..
alexban is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.