Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Ground & Other Ops Forums > Questions
Reload this Page >

Landing gear still down after takeoff?

Wikiposts
Search
Questions If you are a professional pilot or your work involves professional aviation please use this forum for questions. Enthusiasts, please use the 'Spectators Balcony' forum.

Landing gear still down after takeoff?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 25th Jul 2006, 19:37
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Would'nt you like to know
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Devil Landing gear still down after takeoff?

Just a quick question, today at work i watched as a finnair 753 tookoff but seemed to leave the gear down for quite sometime (it was still down when I lost sight of it). I also witnessed the same thing happen on a BA 320, again the gear was still down when I lost sight of it. Both a/c carried on and never returned to the field so i'm assuming it was'nt a technical problem. In both situations T/O appeared 'normal' and A/C had no problem climbing, both a/c were'nt going slow either. Someone out there has to know the answer.
INTHEOUTBACK is offline  
Old 25th Jul 2006, 20:04
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 570
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Probably letting the brakes cool before popping the gear in the bays.

Brakes will easily overheat in this weather with lots of stop-start taxiing.

Have noticed it a bit out of MAN recently.
AlphaWhiskyRomeo is offline  
Old 25th Jul 2006, 22:00
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Choroni, sometimes
Posts: 1,974
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yeah, another reason might be that most aircraft have an inflight braking system. Means before the dunlops move in their houses the wheel spin is stopped. If a failure of this system occurs (e.g. wheel tacho) dunlops have to remain down for 1-2 minutes until rotation stops and retraction can start.

Last edited by hetfield; 25th Jul 2006 at 22:17.
hetfield is offline  
Old 25th Jul 2006, 22:54
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: East and West Mids UK
Posts: 108
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Or a brake line disconnected...Again usually brake system normally stops wheel rotation after take off, but with a brake brake disconnected gear must be left down until wheel stops spinning before raising the gear. I fly 757-200 which requires 2 minutes gear down after take off for this - plus a significant max weight reduction (in region of 14 tonnes) for the lack of 1 brake.
underread east is offline  
Old 27th Jul 2006, 20:57
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: About 3000 below Midhurst SID I reckon
Posts: 691
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
With A320s, I'm with ASR on this one for the most likely reason. Some are prone to overheating brakes. Most A320s use a brake fan after landing to cool them down. The older models of A320 dont have this kit. BA have both the old and new series.

So following TO if the warning goes off or the temp is seen as high, they leave the gear dangling to ensure adequate cooling before retracting it.

This can cause quite rigourous vibration in the cabin but is completely safe and if necessary, a lower height will be maintained until retraction of the gear takes place to allow safe ascent.
sixmilehighclub is offline  
Old 27th Jul 2006, 21:25
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Around
Age: 43
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Probably letting the brakes cool before popping the gear in the bays.
How about just plain forgetting. Happened to a 76 crew about 6 years ago and left them down with parasitic D until they reached the west coast of
Ireland! The words from the engineers on the RT were amusing if not colourful, to those who listened in on company RT it was hysterical to hear pathetic excuses once tech issues were ruled out!
chadwick is offline  
Old 27th Jul 2006, 23:12
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Iceland
Posts: 38
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Or maby they simply forgot the gearpins!!!
Packsonflight is offline  
Old 28th Jul 2006, 00:15
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: No Fixed Abode
Posts: 484
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Heathrow Director has a post on here somewhere (no really, he does!) I read sometime ago and still remember.

I can't remember the situation, but was along the lines of telling a departing Air France aicraft his gear was still down, and the response was 'Affirm, we use it for take-off.''
Kestrel_909 is offline  
Old 28th Jul 2006, 05:51
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: surfing, watching for sharks
Posts: 4,082
Received 55 Likes on 34 Posts
Could possibly be due to a MEL requiring it. Some aircraft can have the overheat loop(s) for the gear deferred. The MEL requirement is that the gear remain down for a prescribed period of time after T/O to ensure no hot brakes.
West Coast is offline  
Old 3rd Aug 2006, 22:45
  #10 (permalink)  
Couldonlyaffordafiver
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: The Twilight Zone near 30W
Posts: 1,934
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
All good suggestions. Another possibility is the nose-wheel snubbers in the nose bay are u/s so the nose-wheel needs to spin down before it retracts.
Human Factor is offline  
Old 4th Aug 2006, 21:07
  #11 (permalink)  
Tabs please !
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Biffins Bridge
Posts: 955
Received 398 Likes on 237 Posts
Originally Posted by Human Factor
Another possibility is the nose-wheel snubbers in the nose bay are u/s so the nose-wheel needs to spin down before it retracts.
Why's that old chum ? If the nosegear retracted sideways a la Trident then the gyroscopic forces would be significant however if the nosegear retracts fore /aft while the wheels maintain their direction in space then the turning moment is zero.

I have my spoon waiting if I deserve a slice of humble pie
B Fraser is online now  
Old 4th Aug 2006, 21:18
  #12 (permalink)  
Per Ardua ad Astraeus
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 18,579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
No 'humble pie' but it is better not to have a wheel rotating at Nx100 RPM in the bay.

Such a defect does, of course, degrade your performance for take-off since the gear remains down.
BOAC is offline  
Old 4th Aug 2006, 22:40
  #13 (permalink)  
Couldonlyaffordafiver
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: The Twilight Zone near 30W
Posts: 1,934
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Careful, Mr F.
In my company we try to avoid using the T-word. It often triggers a very dangerous response along the lines of:

"I remember when I was on Tridents, we used to descend at 20000ft/min and do Mach .92 to the Outer Marker and ....."




Out of interest, on the 777 it reduces the performance limited take-off weight to around 220 tonnes from the usual 270 ish.
Human Factor is offline  
Old 4th Aug 2006, 23:01
  #14 (permalink)  
Tabs please !
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Biffins Bridge
Posts: 955
Received 398 Likes on 237 Posts
I have a set of T3 manuals that show how to do it too, lots of warnings about descending the cabin first so the outside does not overtake the inside.

anyway, I digress.....
B Fraser is online now  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.