Wikiposts
Search
Questions If you are a professional pilot or your work involves professional aviation please use this forum for questions. Enthusiasts, please use the 'Spectators Balcony' forum.

Fuel Density

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 1st Dec 2005, 10:49
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: NAT TRACK FOX
Posts: 160
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Fuel Density

Hello,

How do you calculate Fuel Density ?

Max fuel for a given aircraft is per exemple 50000LT.
How much fuel can you take if density is .80 ??

Many thx
Diabolo is offline  
Old 1st Dec 2005, 11:00
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: West London
Posts: 125
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Max fuel is still 50,000lt.
Sans Anoraque is offline  
Old 1st Dec 2005, 11:12
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: UK
Posts: 264
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
That was a bit mean Sans Anoraque (however totally true)

Density is involved in the relation between weight and volume.

1 kg of water = 1litre of water

so 50,000l of water weighs 50,000kg.

However fuel is less dense than water and weighs less
1 litre of fuel = 0.8kg

(This varies according to temp and pressure but 0.8 is a good benchmark.)

I think what you wanted to ask was how much does 50,000 litres of fuel with a density of 0.8 weigh = 40,000kg
(Weight = density x volume)

or alternately 50,000 kg of fuel = 62,500 litres.
(Volume = weight divided by density)

The fuel tanks in you r question are of a fixed volume so will alway contain 50,000litres of fuel (or water or treacle if you wished). Hence Sans Anoraque's remark

Clear as mud?
Ropey Pilot is offline  
Old 1st Dec 2005, 11:12
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,753
Received 156 Likes on 78 Posts
http://www.tc.gc.ca/CivilAviation/pu.../3-1.htm#3-5-2



Let us say it is 15 Deg C. Jet A is 1.85 Lbs/ litre.
50,000 Litres would wiegh 50000X1.85 = 92,500 Lbs
albatross is offline  
Old 1st Dec 2005, 11:38
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Seattle
Posts: 3,196
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If fuel capacity in weight is calculated for a standard day at sea level, any decrease in density due to temperature will decrease capacity proportionately.
Intruder is offline  
Old 1st Dec 2005, 12:05
  #6 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: NAT TRACK FOX
Posts: 160
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks to all for your replies.
Diabolo is offline  
Old 1st Dec 2005, 12:53
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: uk
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
on finding the volume or wieght of fuel on big uplifts it is essential that you get the specific density of the fuel, this is found when the fuel is tested at the fuel farm, the sg will be measured and the temperature taken of the fuel sample. For eg your 50000 L with a sg of .785 the fuel would weigh 39250 kg, with a sg of .825 your 50000 L would now weigh 41250 kg. When fuelling to possibly over 100 000 kg in different climates there will be a vast difference in litres uplited.
stadis450 is offline  
Old 2nd Dec 2005, 11:11
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,843
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Oh my God!
Let us say it is 15 Deg C. Jet A is 1.85 Lbs/ litre.
50,000 Litres would wiegh 50000X1.85 = 92,500 Lbs
With a mix of Metric and Imperial units like that, it's no wonder that aeroplanes run out of fuel from time to time.

Regards,

Old Smokey
Old Smokey is offline  
Old 2nd Dec 2005, 13:51
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,753
Received 156 Likes on 78 Posts
Gliding with large aircraft is becoming a Canadian tradition.
Also allowed for visiting Nimrods.


- Straight to hell for that one! Is that the door over there?
albatross is offline  
Old 2nd Dec 2005, 18:14
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: flyover country USA
Age: 82
Posts: 4,579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
With a mix of Metric and Imperial units like that, it's no wonder that aeroplanes run out of fuel from time to time.
Smokey, real engineers have to cope with $#%@*&! units all the time.

Just be glad your ASI isn't in furlongs per fortnight.

Speaking of units: the units of imbalance in many rotor-balancing machines are (I am not making this up!) - ahem - Gram-inches.


Last edited by barit1; 3rd Dec 2005 at 21:47.
barit1 is offline  
Old 6th Dec 2005, 12:11
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,843
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hey barit1, should we tell 'em about Slugs per Cubic Foot, or just keep it a secret?

Regards,

Old Smokey
Old Smokey is offline  
Old 6th Dec 2005, 13:02
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Seattle
Posts: 3,196
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
That's only useful when velocity is given in furlongs per fortnight...
Intruder is offline  
Old 6th Dec 2005, 14:43
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: London
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Cool Rationalisation

Time to introduce some more sensible units

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microfortnight
FiddlerMax is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.