Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Ground & Other Ops Forums > Questions
Reload this Page >

Wet baggage weight

Wikiposts
Search
Questions If you are a professional pilot or your work involves professional aviation please use this forum for questions. Enthusiasts, please use the 'Spectators Balcony' forum.

Wet baggage weight

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 9th Oct 2004, 15:12
  #1 (permalink)  
SLF

Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 143
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Wet baggage weight

A friend recently flew Bangladesh-Bangkok after an hours delay due to torrential rain at Bangladesh. On arrival, her (canvas) luggage was completely waterlogged, and it appeared that everyone else's was too (including some cardboard bags in a rather sorry state!)

This sparked a few questions - are the bags or containers weighed prior to loading, or do you assume "average" weight per pax? And she reckons that her wet bag was probably 40% heavier than it's dry weight, would this have been taken into account?

Just curious!
SLF is offline  
Old 11th Oct 2004, 03:37
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Arizona USA
Posts: 8,571
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hmmm, considering Bangladesh, lucky to have the baggage at all, never mind soaked.

NB. Everything is a bit wet/soaked in that area.
411A is offline  
Old 11th Oct 2004, 03:53
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,843
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
No, it isn't considered.

On the topic of what is / is not considered, it's always amused me that you may depart with, say, 100 Kg of food in the galleys, but after consumption by the passengers, it's no longer considered as a part of the aircraft weight for a second departure with the same passengers aboard.
Old Smokey is offline  
Old 11th Oct 2004, 10:17
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 613
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Danger

As long as the toilets are serviced, then the weight has gone!!

BN2A is offline  
Old 11th Oct 2004, 15:08
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Arizona USA
Posts: 8,571
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Not necessarily.
If some of the CC have helped themselves (I once noticed a breakfast omelet in the left coat pocket of a steward, potatoes in the other...believe it or not) then that food may still be aboard.
411A is offline  
Old 11th Oct 2004, 15:51
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Europe
Posts: 3,261
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Luggage is weighted at check-in (that's how they manage to make you pay overweight ). You'll notice the figure appears on the luggage receipt that is usually handed to you with the boarding card.
flyblue is offline  
Old 14th Oct 2004, 08:28
  #7 (permalink)  
SLF

Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 143
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks for the responses, I guess the extra water is relatively insignificant. And possibly some of the cardboard boxes just melt
SLF is offline  
Old 15th Oct 2004, 09:56
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Middlesesx
Posts: 2,075
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Luuggage is not weighed at check-in unless there is something unusual about the route, weather or a/c type. It is for all intent and purpose given a notional weight. For example BA notional weights are 12kgs UK 14 kgs EU and 16kgs World. They have used these figures for the last 10 years and you will no doubt be surprised at how low they are.

Bins / containers are also given fixed weights dependant on the baggage count for each one, weights being from 450kgs to 750 kgs the latter rare. Most will take between 40 - 60 bags and there is a full reconciliation of all bags and there bin location. Aircarft loading put simply uses the dry weight which includes a/c empty plus crew / catering and bags; same again plus fuel ; and then all plus punters / baggage / cargo. Key points after this are predicted departure weight after fuel burn / landing weight after journey fuel burn.
HZ123 is offline  
Old 15th Oct 2004, 12:48
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Europe
Posts: 3,261
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
HZ123, luggage is weighted at check in. Then the loadsheet are made using the figures you state per luggage. Keep in mind that there is a max allowed after which you have to pay overweight, and ground takes into consideration that overweight. I remember a ground supervisor for my airline going mad at a check in person for allowing overweight baggage without charging the pax by only reporting it as 23Kgs (max allowed) and pretending that was all (check in person was alone on the flight and didn't want to slow down waiting line. Problem is he did it for more than one pax). Supervisor's point was that this way he could not take into consideration the extra weight for the loadsheet (in this case it turned out to be 600Kgs), and for connecting flights loadsheets.
flyblue is offline  
Old 15th Oct 2004, 12:58
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Middlesesx
Posts: 2,075
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Correction acknowledged. But that exercise is purely for excess baggage charges and is not connected to the 'Load Sheet' unless there is a specific request. I cannot remember the last time this ocurred, I am sure that other outfits do it diffrerently. BA load sheets are produced 24 hours before departure with notional weights thus indicating how much space we have for cargo. This applys to shorthaul / longhaul and BACX a/c.
HZ123 is offline  
Old 15th Oct 2004, 13:15
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: London UK
Posts: 7,667
Likes: 0
Received 25 Likes on 20 Posts
Was there not some discussion after the Charlotte NC Beech 1900 accident that the notional loadsheet figures for pax and baggage had become/always were inappropriate.

On the original question I would not have thought that the water absorbency of baggage would make any significant difference to weight. It's not as if it's a dry cargo.
WHBM is online now  
Old 15th Oct 2004, 15:18
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Arizona USA
Posts: 8,571
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yeah, but the cardboard boxes used in that area could well become wet cargo soon enough.
411A is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.