Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Ground & Other Ops Forums > Questions
Reload this Page >

Airliner Fuel Efficiency

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Questions If you are a professional pilot or your work involves professional aviation please use this forum for questions. Enthusiasts, please use the 'Spectators Balcony' forum.

Airliner Fuel Efficiency

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 1st May 2004 | 10:14
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
From: uk
Airliner Fuel Efficiency

Hi,

Just a quick question, if a Ford Ka can do, lets say, 65 miles to the gallon, what can the average wide body airliner do per person??

c152pilot
c152pilot is offline  
Old 1st May 2004 | 19:03
  #2 (permalink)  

Jet Blast Rat
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 2,081
Likes: 0
From: Sarfend-on-Sea
Worked it out once, using a 737-400 as an example (as I had CAP 697 available, and the MRJT example in there is the 734). I seem to remember that at about 2/3 full the aircraft burned as much as a fleet modern, mid-sized car with two to three people per car to carry the same numbers, distance London to Nice as an example. Assuming many of the businessmen would probably drive alone otherwise, over this range the jet is quite an efficient option, certainly the case against air travel is not as clear as environmentalists would say.

For a rough guide a 737-400 uses about 2.5 tonnes per hour of Jet A1 (Sp G around 0.80 kg/litre) and cruises around 430-450 knots TAS.
Send Clowns is offline  
Old 3rd May 2004 | 03:07
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 66
Likes: 0
From: Montreal
Also heard that if every pax in a 747 took a car to cover the same distance instead of flying, the 747 burns less fuel. I know I dont have any numbers but i can believe it. Airliners are only getting more efficient. Aircrafts these days (777, A330...) burn 30-50% less fuel per passenger then older aircrafts (707, DC-10...).
Just thought I would mention this.
sanket_patel is offline  
Old 3rd May 2004 | 16:27
  #4 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
Veteran: Navy
 
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 3,203
Likes: 2
From: Seattle
A 747-400 burns from 1.8 to 3.4 tonnes/hour/engine at cruise, depending on weight. Call it 3400 gal/hour on average. At 500 knots, that's 585 mph. 585/3400=0.17 mpg (5.8 gal/mi). If there are 350 passengers on board, that's 60 passenger miles per gallon -- about the same as the claim for my wife's new Toyota Prius when she's driving to work solo (though so far she only gets 46-48...)!
Intruder is offline  
Old 4th May 2004 | 10:17
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 169
Likes: 0
From: suitcase
But its just so much nicer to order 150ton of jetA1 then it is to fill the Prius up isn't it...

Cheerio
dragon501 is offline  
Old 4th May 2004 | 14:38
  #6 (permalink)  
df1
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 135
Likes: 0
From: UK
Comparable indeed. Equivalent efficiency plus there are not many Ford Ka's that can get you to Nice an hour and a half.
df1 is offline  
Old 4th May 2004 | 20:33
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 734
Likes: 10
From: London, GB
http://www.bh.com/companions/0340741...es/default.htm

Data set A refers, scroll to the very bottom.

For example the 747-400 burns (kg of fuel per passenger per nautical mile): 0.05 kg.

B767-300ER, 0.0472 kg.
DC 9-30, 0.0860 kg.
MD 11, 0.0543 kg.
F100, 0.0604 kg.
A300-600R, 0.0529 kg.
A320-200, 0.0443 kg.
A340-300, 0.0472 kg.
B737-400, 0.0395 kg.
B737-800, 0.0465 kg.

etc..
selfin is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.