New Lufthansa callsigns
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location:
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
New Lufthansa callsigns
Recently I've been hearing a lot of letters in the Lufthansa callsigns eg. "LH 8NV".
Are all Lufthansa flights using this kind of callsigns now? If so, why? And are there any logic behind the allocation of a callsign to a specific flight or is it random?
--
Regards,
SP
Are all Lufthansa flights using this kind of callsigns now? If so, why? And are there any logic behind the allocation of a callsign to a specific flight or is it random?
--
Regards,
SP
Paid up
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 601
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
According to Flight International, the introduction of phonetically based callsigns is intended to make them easier to differentiate.
Apparently confusion has arisen for pilots and ATC when two sequential flight numbers such as 7566 and 7567 are in the same sector.
Apparently confusion has arisen for pilots and ATC when two sequential flight numbers such as 7566 and 7567 are in the same sector.
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Europe
Posts: 270
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Gin Slinger is right, the reason for intrucucing the alpha-numerical callsigns is to make it easier to differentiate.
And yes, almost all flights use these new callsigns. Threre are some flights that use the old callsigns since ATC at theire destinations is not able to handle the new ones. Ah, I forgot - the long haul flights will keep the old callsigns for the moment.
Another reason is, that at LH almost every transport has a LH Number. That includes the trucks used for cargo transports on the road. So with the time there were not enough numbers for flights and other transports (also including codeshare numbers for partnerairlines, etc.)
So long, DBate
And yes, almost all flights use these new callsigns. Threre are some flights that use the old callsigns since ATC at theire destinations is not able to handle the new ones. Ah, I forgot - the long haul flights will keep the old callsigns for the moment.
Another reason is, that at LH almost every transport has a LH Number. That includes the trucks used for cargo transports on the road. So with the time there were not enough numbers for flights and other transports (also including codeshare numbers for partnerairlines, etc.)
So long, DBate
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location:
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thank you for your replys.
I agree that the new callsigns I've heard so far are easier to differentiate, even more so as long as the majority of airlines are still using only numbers.
--
Regards,
SP
I agree that the new callsigns I've heard so far are easier to differentiate, even more so as long as the majority of airlines are still using only numbers.
--
Regards,
SP
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Near Stalyvegas
Age: 78
Posts: 2,022
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Had one into Manch...DLH9T9 
GMP called it "Lufthansa Nine T nine" [said rather quickly] and the pilot replied with the same c/s.
Also we were told..."It's to stop confusion in the Munich Area"
we aim to please, it keeps the cleaners happy
GMP called it "Lufthansa Nine T nine" [said rather quickly] and the pilot replied with the same c/s.Also we were told..."It's to stop confusion in the Munich Area"
we aim to please, it keeps the cleaners happy
