Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Ground & Other Ops Forums > Questions
Reload this Page >

Use of thrust reversers during taxi

Wikiposts
Search
Questions If you are a professional pilot or your work involves professional aviation please use this forum for questions. Enthusiasts, please use the 'Spectators Balcony' forum.

Use of thrust reversers during taxi

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 2nd Oct 2003, 00:16
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Paros, Greece
Posts: 768
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Use of thrust reversers during taxi

I Watched a Ryanair 737-200 taxiing out to 06L at MAN today and twice during the (rather fast) taxi, he appeared to use the thrust reversers, presumabely to slow the aircraft. I've never seen that done before, so does anybody know if it's either a standard or non-standard procedure with Ryanair or anybody else?

The only reason I can imagine this MAY be done is to keep the brakes cool - it was a very fast taxi so I imagine they'd be used a lot - and it'd been a very short turnaround too. Is this close to the mark or not, or is it perhaps possible to accidently pull the thrust levers into reverse when going to idle? The distinctive 737-200 reverser buckets deployed for about 5 seconds on each occasion, but I couldn't hear if there was any increase in engine RPM.
knobbygb is offline  
Old 2nd Oct 2003, 00:30
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: sunny country
Posts: 101
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
That procedure is operational for B737-200 series but it's recommended to keep reversers at idle or just a little above it. This really keeps brakes cooler but it doesn't mean that taxi speed can be faster than usual...
Bokomoko is offline  
Old 2nd Oct 2003, 00:54
  #3 (permalink)  

I'matightbastard
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,747
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I've seen a bizjet taxiing this way once and I asked someone about it and he said it was standard to open just one bucket. That way they coiuld use one engine for going faster and one for slowing down.
Onan the Clumsy is offline  
Old 2nd Oct 2003, 02:26
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: UTC +8
Posts: 2,626
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
In the USA some carriers at some airports "power-back" from the gate with reverse thrust.
GlueBall is offline  
Old 2nd Oct 2003, 03:31
  #5 (permalink)  
still learning....
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: USA
Posts: 169
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
At my airline, use of reverse for taxi is at the Captain's discretion. Not permitted on the 767, though...too much chance of FOD damage
quid is offline  
Old 2nd Oct 2003, 03:56
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Oran
Posts: 145
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
We operate 767 300 and in some airports we have a long taxi and hot temps plus the airport is at 2000ft amsl (Madrid) so on a clean wide taxi way I use idle reverse to save the brakes, we have brake temp readings and it does help.

However there are many places I would not use reverse on taxy ways because there is to much fod around.
icemanalgeria is offline  
Old 2nd Oct 2003, 04:38
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: surfing, watching for sharks
Posts: 4,077
Received 55 Likes on 34 Posts
Reversers help out a lot if you have both (or more) running
West Coast is online now  
Old 2nd Oct 2003, 07:47
  #8 (permalink)  
Props are for boats!
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: An Asian Hub
Age: 56
Posts: 994
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I suppose from a propellor perspective. Ive used Reverse in a Twotter to back up gently. Its ok, aslong as you have a Marshaller or you know your clear behind. Also be carefull with the brakes when doing so. One can satnd on the breaks and put the ship on its "bum". With KIng Airs though and Twotter during taxi tend to use "Beta" and use reverse as an absolute last resort.

Allthough I have seen a Mexican PGR King Air B300 attempt a reverse into a Hangar once. Which incidently was not successfull. Also seen an Oz Army King Air B350 reverse at Darwin once aswell. This to me was not required as Tugs were freely available, and only causes possible F.O.D. problems and high ITTs.


Regards
Sheep
Sheep Guts is offline  
Old 2nd Oct 2003, 16:41
  #9 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Paros, Greece
Posts: 768
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks. Seems like it's done more than I thought. Guess it's just easier to spot on somthing like a 732. And there was me ready to slag-off Ryanair again.
knobbygb is offline  
Old 2nd Oct 2003, 21:11
  #10 (permalink)  

Helicopter Pilots Get It Up Quicker
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location:
Posts: 885
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Check here too...

http://www.pprune.org/forums/showthr...5&pagenumber=1
pilotwolf is offline  
Old 3rd Oct 2003, 17:18
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Here
Posts: 1,015
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hi,

Picture of a Canadair CC-144B Challenger taxing with idle reverse at Madrid.

http://www.airliners.net/open.file/429379/M/

BAe 146-100
BAe 146-100 is offline  
Old 7th Oct 2003, 20:20
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: USA
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
and only causes possible F.O.D. problems and high ITTs

can someone please enlighten me as to what both these abbrevs mean ..

FOD and ITTS ..

thanks

sleeper
Sle@per is offline  
Old 7th Oct 2003, 21:24
  #13 (permalink)  
Suave yet Shallow
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: half way between the gutter and the stars.
Posts: 343
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
FOD - Foreign Object Damage
ITT - Internal Turbine Temperature
topcat450 is offline  
Old 7th Oct 2003, 22:37
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: south
Posts: 3,142
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From a government report.

FAA certification experience consists of overtemperature testing at various governing temperature locations, such as Turbine Inlet Temperature (TIT),
Inter-turbine Temperature (ITT), or
Exhaust Gas Temperature (EGT).
ITT just means that the temperature is measured between turbine sections instead of in front (TIT) or at the end of the engine (EGT).

It seems that ITT is used primarily in turbo prop engines vice turbojets which use the EGT method. They all relate to the health or performance of the jet and are recorded by most operators to keep track of the wear and tear of the powerplant.
7p3i7lot is offline  
Old 11th Oct 2003, 02:00
  #15 (permalink)  
rwm
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: canada
Posts: 170
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
ITT, EGT, TIT are all variations of basicaly the same measurement. All are measuring the engine temp, and each engine and or manufacturer has a prefered way to do this. It has little to do with turbo prop, turbo shaft, free turbine, reverse flow, turbo jet, turbo fan, ect. It mainly comes down to how the engine is designed.

This is as was stated a parameter measured for determination of the health of the engine. It is used in conjuction with a couple of other measurement such as N1, or Gas Producer, or Lp, and fuel flow, and torque, or thrust or EPR. Also needed is the density altitude and outside air temp.

Take a PT6T as in a Bell 212/412. You need to check the outside air temp, the altitude, you must pull 50% torque, and be at 97%rotor speed. From this you read a chart from the maintenace manual, or flight manual, and you will be given a ITT limit and an N1 limit. If your engine has numbers less than the limit in the chart, the engine is servicable.
rwm is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.