Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Ground & Other Ops Forums > Questions
Reload this Page >

2-stage rotation versus initial climb attitude for takeoff

Wikiposts
Search
Questions If you are a professional pilot or your work involves professional aviation please use this forum for questions. Enthusiasts, please use the 'Spectators Balcony' forum.

2-stage rotation versus initial climb attitude for takeoff

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 16th Sep 2003, 07:16
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: N
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2-stage rotation versus initial climb attitude for takeoff

Hi there,

1) Can someone explain the preferred use of one of the above methods over the other when flying a particular aircraft and
2) The proper technique for using the two stage rotation method in a typical commercial aircraft (e. g. Dash 8)

Thanks

J.C. (MYNN)
PapaBravo is offline  
Old 16th Sep 2003, 21:07
  #2 (permalink)  
ecj
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: sector 001
Posts: 384
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Might this be to avoid a tail scrape?
ecj is offline  
Old 17th Sep 2003, 03:00
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Southern UK
Posts: 92
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
To avoid a tailscrape, or to keep clear of stall warning before sufficient acceleration has taken place.
northwing is offline  
Old 17th Sep 2003, 03:10
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Skagness on the beach
Posts: 882
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I bet in that A340-600 it is more like a ten stage rotation to a climb that only happens because the earth is round.
747FOCAL is offline  
Old 17th Sep 2003, 04:30
  #5 (permalink)  

Aviator
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Norveg
Posts: 483
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What 2-stage rotation? On the Dash-8-300 we rotate once. The aircraft is certificated to do a single rotation. About 3deg/sec as a guideline. Or might you be referring to the flare upon landing as the second stage? ;-)
Crossunder is offline  
Old 17th Sep 2003, 16:22
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: UK
Posts: 163
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
747 - You have duff gen on the A346 - its got huge amounts of power. The A340-300 series is underpowered which has been rectified in spades on the 600 model.
fatboy slim is offline  
Old 17th Sep 2003, 21:00
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Skagness on the beach
Posts: 882
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
fatboy slim, I know. I was just playin as indicated by the smiley.
747FOCAL is offline  
Old 19th Sep 2003, 06:52
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: dubai
Posts: 942
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The DC8-73 has a 2 stage rotation if memory serves me correctly.

One of the reasons the UK CAA weren't happy about having the type on the UK register?
doubleu-anker is offline  
Old 19th Sep 2003, 07:11
  #9 (permalink)  
MasterBates
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
one rotation please

There is actually nothing that says 2 stage rotations must be done with any aircraft. This is more or less an old habit, but itīs generally understood today that 2-3°/sec cont. rotation gets us airborne safely, no tailscraping, and of course the a/c needs to be rotated at the right airspeed. When weight is underestimated (American passengers ) a pilot might hesitate a little because the aircraft needs these extra knots to fly.
But, in general it is an understanding today that we only use one continous rotation.
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.