![]() |
ATPL Modular Route, which school to use
Hi, just nearly finished my hours building and I am looking to the next stage of doing my ATPL Theory. I am based in the UK and I was wondering if anyone can help. I have looked at alot of schools, one to one tours etc but I am stuck between either L3 Harris, Atlantic (although not visited here yet), South West Aviation or maybe Aeros. Has anyone been to these companies and if so, are the Modular students treated differently to integrated (can't afford to lose my money when a school goes under etc and I feel I have more control over my course, although If I like the school for my ATPL Theory then I will probably stay on and complete my training there), where have you looked for accommodation. Are there any other schools to think about. Did think about ACS but they don't do just ATPL Theory.
|
You've done your hour building but haven't started ATPL theory? How many have you done?
I've just started PPL, and when complete, will be doing ATPL with BGS by distance learning. I'm doing night/IR(R)/hour building all with my local airfield. I haven't seen a complaint about BGS, whether you choose distance or the residential course. For complex training, I'll wait and see what the options are when I get there, but reckon it'll be Stapleford. Aeros are marketing Fasttrack heavily which is an integrated program veiled as modular in the sense that whilst in regulatory terms it's modular, you're tied to the one ATO, you can't move, and if you don't like Aeros, then tough, because you're stuck. Aeros is probably the most expensive modular provider (you pay for the company's size). Don't forget their £87k doesn't even include APS/MCC. Doing the course at true modular providers from zero to APS MCC can be £60k if you strictly go for the cheapest. I'm looking at £70k for my plan. Integrated schools will always prioritise Integrated students, but particularly so if they have airline tagged/sponsored students due to delay penalties in their agreements with the airline. In any case, do not go with L3Harris. It doesn't take a lot of effort to read about what's been said about them here. Want a school that will treat you like a number? Go to a big school which cares about the big numbers. Want a school that is more personal and, on average, will deliver you a better service? Go to a smaller school (though verify what other students have said about it first) |
powerflight, thank you for your reply. I've done about 135hrs in total including all the necessary cross country etc. Done my PPL, NR so I plan to do my fATPL in January if I can finally find somewhere.
L3, I already have doubts about them. Its a nightmare to find somewhere. I did like FTA and nearly signed up with them just before then went bust. I've heard that it isn't good to have more than 3 schools in total for your training. I will keep looking and narrowing down my list. Thank you for taking the time to reply. . |
If you mean you have 135 hours total then there's still time to help you. If you mean you've done 135 hours of hour building and no IMC time then you're already painted into a corner and you dont have many options..
|
Originally Posted by Ann21
(Post 11739037)
I've heard that it isn't good to have more than 3 schools in total for your training.
. ATPL Theory CPL/MEIR APS/MCC Those are the ones airlines like BA care about. They don't care where you do your PPL and hour building, the above are the ones that matter. |
I would personally hold off on any more hour building if you haven't completed your ATPL theory yet. You want to get a nice solid bit of hour building in just before starting your commercial courses, otherwise you'll just be spending your first few lessons scraping off the rust.
Is there any reason you haven't looked at Bristol Ground School? |
Good advice. I always say do nothing until you have a class one medical. Then do nothing until you have passed all your PPL exams. Once you have a PPL go straight for a night rating then do nothing until you have the ATPL exams passed.
|
I'm planning on doing my ATPL theory whilst hour building, can you explain the disadvantage of that? It'll be the winter so won't be able to get loads of hours in anyway.
|
I don't see a problem at all with that. You can fly and train all you want while you are studying but you can't take the skill test until you have passed your exams. A lot of schools say otherwise, but they are wrong.
|
Agree, nothing wrong with doing both at the same time. Personally, I found it a little too demanding on my time what with studying, working and general day-to-day life so ended up doing an intense couple of months hour building once my studies were complete. But if you can make it work, then go for it. Was great fun getting to fly several times a week and really have me the chance to make sure I was up to standard before starting the commercial courses.
Which leads on to the important bit about hour building. It's not a tick-box exercise, but your time to bring your skills up to them best standard you can before undertaking the commercial courses. The more you effectively use your time hour building, the more likely you'll get your commercial courses done in minimum hours. |
Cool, thanks guys. I can do my PPL and ATPL theory for £15k, hour building for £15k, and then if the market is good finish complex training. I'm in final year of uni but run an agency that earns more than I'll ever make flying, but it means I can delay until the time is right if it was necessary.
When I was weighing up Integrated/Modular, I really did place a lot of weight on the name/tagging etc, but now I've started modular, the concept of spending 18 (realistically 24) months on someone else's schedule, paying a premium to do it, and doing it with a school that might not survive long enough to get me my licenses, when I could do it cheaper, on my own terms and schedule, and faster... it just seems like a no brainer to do modular |
Originally Posted by powerflight
(Post 11739938)
I'm planning on doing my ATPL theory whilst hour building, can you explain the disadvantage of that? It'll be the winter so won't be able to get loads of hours in anyway.
I assume you're going to save money by doing the CBIR next? If so you'll need to split your hour building into 3 blocks (~50/20/30) to represent the prerequisites for IR (50XC) MEP (70PIC) and CPL (100PIC) it makes sense to do half your hour building during your ATPL study (you can use those exams to get the IRR and/or CBIR) and half after your exams and immediately before each module to give you a good amount of recency of skills. |
Yeah I just started PPL so got a bit of a while to go before CBIR but that's the plan. I'll try and get my ATPL done in 6 months with two weeks per subject. Three blocks of hour building is a good suggestion - I was struggling to work out exactly 'what' hours (IR, XC, etc) to do and when.
I also have an NPPL which I use for general flying skills and have a share that means I can fly @ £40/hr wet. Hours don't credit, but means I can do procedures/comms/flying for real without spending a fortune, and keep my core flying skills in tact (even if I can't do radio nav in my NPPL aircraft). |
i'll try and get my atpl done in 6 months with two weeks per subject. I often get requests from students for help as they are running out of time (18 months) and/or sittings (6 in total). Sounds easy but in reality life gets in the way and those deadlines will arrive sooner than you think. Don't not under estimate the amount of time & volume of work required, mostly learning high-class rubbish you will never use or see again. |
Originally Posted by RichardH
(Post 11740157)
This is wildly optimistic and ATPLs don't work like that. I can count on one hand those who I have seen completed in 6 months, usually already experienced pilots with overseas or military experience doing conversions. Even the full-time in attendance courses are around the 7-8 month time frame including actually sitting the exams. The average PPL holder will take around 12 months DL that's assuming they are fully focused, with no distractions and/or unnecessary emotional baggage.
I often get requests from students for help as they are running out of time (18 months) and/or sittings (6 in total). Sounds easy but in reality life gets in the way and those deadlines will arrive sooner than you think. Don't not under estimate the amount of time & volume of work required, mostly learning high-class rubbish you will never use or see again. But, OP, that is 50 hours a week full time with nothing else going on. 90% of the stuff you will need to learn is absolute garbage with zero use in your flying career, and you’ll mostly just learn question bank answers, but it’s all worth it in the end! |
I did mine when questions were all multiple choice and you could still smash the question banks. (Remember the year when the changed the questions and literally everyone failed the OPS exam?) Anyway I did it in a cumulative 4 months of study. 4/4/3/3 subjects per month doing the 'hardest' subjects first so I could roll over any failures.. It worked OK for me but I'm talking dawn to dusk 1 week per subject, then taking them in reverse order two on the Monday and two on the Thursday to make extra revision time. I wouldn't recommend it but it shows what a little motivation can do.
|
"I can do my PPL and ATPL theory for £15k,"
Wow.... |
Originally Posted by powerflight
(Post 11739014)
You've done your hour building but haven't started ATPL theory? How many have you done?
I've just started PPL, and when complete, will be doing ATPL with BGS by distance learning. I'm doing night/IR(R)/hour building all with my local airfield. I haven't seen a complaint about BGS, whether you choose distance or the residential course. For complex training, I'll wait and see what the options are when I get there, but reckon it'll be Stapleford. Aeros are marketing Fasttrack heavily which is an integrated program veiled as modular in the sense that whilst in regulatory terms it's modular, you're tied to the one ATO, you can't move, and if you don't like Aeros, then tough, because you're stuck. Aeros is probably the most expensive modular provider (you pay for the company's size). Don't forget their £87k doesn't even include APS/MCC. Doing the course at true modular providers from zero to APS MCC can be £60k if you strictly go for the cheapest. I'm looking at £70k for my plan. Integrated schools will always prioritise Integrated students, but particularly so if they have airline tagged/sponsored students due to delay penalties in their agreements with the airline. In any case, do not go with L3Harris. It doesn't take a lot of effort to read about what's been said about them here. Want a school that will treat you like a number? Go to a big school which cares about the big numbers. Want a school that is more personal and, on average, will deliver you a better service? Go to a smaller school (though verify what other students have said about it first) Also is VA airline training a good provider for the mcc |
Originally Posted by paco
(Post 11740443)
"I can do my PPL and ATPL theory for £15k,"
Wow.... |
DL Theory for ATPL can be done a lot less expensively than that. Most PPL schools just give you a book.
|
I mean I've budgeted £3.2k with BGS and £1.1k in exam fees.
PPL I'm at a decent school with fair prices so min hours should put me in just over 10k inc. fees. |
I remember when ATPL distance learning was £999!
|
It's 100 more than that here
|
Originally Posted by FastJet1
(Post 11741934)
What happens if you walk away from Aeros fasttrack? Surely they’re not gonna beat you up
Also is VA airline training a good provider for the mcc VA Airline training is excellent, I did my APS-MCC (whitetail) there and thoroughly enjoyed it, learned a lot, and felt it gave me an edge (or certainly more confidence) in sim assessments... it is however more than you (regulatorily) need and you do pay a bit more for that (although entirely worth it if you ask me!). |
Originally Posted by FastJet1
(Post 11741934)
What happens if you walk away from Aeros fasttrack? Surely they’re not gonna beat you up
|
Originally Posted by FastJet1
(Post 11741934)
Also is VA airline training a good provider for the mcc
|
VA used to offer the APS MCC as part of the Ryanair mentored programme but I see this is no longer the case.
If you are hoping to get a job with Ryanair, doesn’t it put you at a disadvantage versus their current mentored scheme providers? |
Originally Posted by Trey Table
(Post 11743488)
VA used to offer the APS MCC as part of the Ryanair mentored programme but I see this is no longer the case.
If you are hoping to get a job with Ryanair, doesn’t it put you at a disadvantage versus their current mentored scheme providers? |
UK modular flying school- help needed
I know this is off topic but basically I’m looking at a few different flying schools in the UK that do the modular route which can take me to the first officer role. I’ve got a few open days next month but I’ve not seen that much reviews from these flying schools on here:
Ravenair in Liverpool, Aeros, Stapleford and GoFlyOxford. if anyone has information on here and their personal reviews of these flying schools please let me know. thank you |
Try searching again... Stapleford had had plenty of positive feedback over the years.
|
is this from ppl to finish or atpl to finish?
ps consider Flight training London, in Elstree as an option.. |
Originally Posted by Beaker_
(Post 11750867)
Try searching again... Stapleford had had plenty of positive feedback over the years.
|
Originally Posted by Micheal_A
(Post 11750871)
is this from ppl to finish or atpl to finish?
ps consider Flight training London, in Elstree as an option.. |
UK modular schools feedback 2025
Hello all,
I will soon be done with the ATPL exams and will have flown the hours necessary to start the CPL MEP IR. I'm in the process of looking for schools that offer dual UK CAA / EASA licence and I am considering the following: - Stapleford - Aeros - Aviation Southwest - AFTA (Ireland) - ACS (Scotland) Anybody have any current or recent experience with any of the above that can give some feedback? Thanks in advance. |
Thing to remember is an EASA IR Skills Test needs to be flown in EASA airspace, a UK IR Test in UK airspace. Ask the school how they do it, CPL and MEP can usually be done as a dual test the IR can't really.
Have you looked at the British Aerobatic Academy? They can offer both as well. |
@Edington, that isn't strictly true. The requirement for the IR test to be flown in EASA airspace only applies to ATOs that are approved to operate outside EASA airspace. The UK rules mirror the EASA rules. Thus a UK-based ATO with both UK and EASA approvals must test for the EASA IR in EASA airspace but the UK test can be flown in any airspace. It can, in theory, be one single test conducted in EASA airspace (provided the examiner holds both authorisations). Good point, though, different ATOs cope with this in different ways and setting up a single test for both licences can be challenging. It is often easier (but more expensive) to fly two tests.
|
Didn't have them on my radar, will check them out, thank you
|
Aeros flight training (UK)
Hi guys I’m trying to find a decent school that offers a modular scheme for me to get my ppl then hopefully my cpl as I plan on working full time while trying to do my training.
Ive recently came across Aeros flight training and I was wondering if any of you could give me your opinion on them. Cheers! |
Would have been good to get some replies on this. I'm also looking at Aeros as an option.
Originally Posted by NJ7445
(Post 11909828)
Hi guys I’m trying to find a decent school that offers a modular scheme for me to get my ppl then hopefully my cpl as I plan on working full time while trying to do my training.
Ive recently came across Aeros flight training and I was wondering if any of you could give me your opinion on them. Cheers! |
Likewise, I would have liked to have seen more on this, as I am considering this school as well. I may have a friend from work who is in touch with someone he believes is training here. If i get any more Ill let you know.
|
| All times are GMT. The time now is 16:18. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.