PPRuNe Forums

PPRuNe Forums (https://www.pprune.org/)
-   Professional Pilot Training (includes ground studies) (https://www.pprune.org/professional-pilot-training-includes-ground-studies-14/)
-   -   Legitimacy of MALGUS (https://www.pprune.org/professional-pilot-training-includes-ground-studies/7653-legitimacy-malgus.html)

The Graduate 12th Oct 2001 15:22

Legitimacy of MALGUS
 
Can anyone confirm to me the legitimacy of the offers made by Malgus Ltd?

I gave a call to BAE Systems in Jerez yesterday. The man in their marketing department sounded very clued up legally and was not saying anything that would legally count as a confirmation.

what he did say is that he could confirm that Malgus have made the *intention* of putting sttudents through their training. BAE Systems also have nothing to do with the offer. They are simply "being asked to train the cadets for Malgus as they do by BA, Aer Lingus etc".

If anyone can confirm the legitimacy of the offer before I commit my £147 for testing and a flight to Scotland that would be great!

It seems almost too good to be true, don't you agree?

fritz_2001 12th Oct 2001 15:37

All indications say that the offer is legit. Although we appear to be banned from talking about this offer in this forum!!

You would known this already if the previous threads on this topic hadn't been removed!! This is exactly why threads on this topic should remain in the forum - to help wannabes.

rant over

mw

Sir Algernon Scruggs 12th Oct 2001 16:26

What is on offer?

Malgus are offering 100% sponsorships to 16 applicants to get a FULL ATPL (frozen) for absolutely no cost to themselves. The training will be done at BaeSystems in Jerez. All accommodation and food is included. Do not know if travel to and from is included.

Each applicant is required to pay up front £147. This amount has been arrived at by Malgus as £100 towards training and £47 to Malgus - to cover the cost of staff, advertising and 'other' costs. It has now been established that Malgus are proposing to 'fund' the project themselves.

These are their terms and conditions:
[list=a][*]You shall pay Malgus Limited the sum of £147 (inclusive of VAT)
[*]Malgus Limited shall arrange for you to participate in the necessary basic examinations and tests with a view to proceeding to a full Training Course to obtain a Joint Airworthiness Authority Commercial Pilots License. You will be given at least 2 weeks notice of the date of the first Examination which will take place at the Glynhill Hotel, Renfrew where Malgus Limited have arranged a reduced rate for candidates wishing to stay overnight.
[*]At each stage in the process the examining body will select those candidates who are to proceed to the next stage. The decision of the examining body will be final. Malgus Limited will have no involvement in this process.
[*]If you are successful in reaching the final selection interview, you will have to enter into a further, more detailed agreement with Malgus Limited
[*]For successful candidates, Malgus Limited shall pay the full cost of accommodation and training (with exception of multiple resit fees) to achieve such a license. For the avoidance of doubt, on successful completion of the course there is no obligation to make any reimbursement to Malgus Limited of the sponsorship money.
[*]Refund of fee. If you tell Malgus limited at least fourteen days before the first Examination date of your intention to withdraw from the program you shall receive a full 100% refund. If seven to fourteen days notice is given before the Examination date then you shall receive 50% of the fee paid. Under no other circumstances ( including failure to pass the JAA FCL Class One Medical Examination at the final stage ) will a refund of the fee be granted.
[*]If Malgus Ltd in their sole discretion decide that the project is not viable and decide to cancel the sponsorship offer at any time, all candidates who have applied will receive a full 100% refund of their initial fee.[/list=a]

How do the numbers stack up?

First some assumptions:
  • £147 per applicant
  • £40k per course in Jerez (approx) = 400 applicants
  • £100 used as basis towards all training costs.

Figures:

Fundamentals:
  • To put 16 selected candidates through BaeSystems will cost £640,000.
  • No of applicants required by Malgus to fund the 16 courses is 6400.
  • If Malgus get 6400 applicants they will automatically receive £300,800 for their running costs. i.e. £47 from each applicant. (less possible refunds and charges from Parc Aviation).

Now for some other relevancies;

I doubt that we can assume that they will get 6400 candidates in one go. It will take a period of weeks. So they will have on going costs for Parc and for the Glynhill Hotel but they will have revenue which they can turn into further cash, so I think it's clear that they are NOT doing it for altruistic reasons.

They are probably doing it for business purposes only and not solely for the welfare and future of wannabes.

Finally, there will be 6384 disappointed applicants for the 16 that are chosen (399 for) each one chosen.

Conclusion:

Even if Malgus get enough first time round applicants to pay for one or two courses there will not be enough people left or entering the market for a second round of operating the scheme - the bad feeling from the 1000's of rejects will ensure that... however, where they are going to get over 6,000 wannabes who are prepared to part with £147 is anybodies guess and I suppose if people are desperate enough then maybe, but I doubt it.

Althought the company is legitimate and they are offering a chance to get on a course they require many more people to part with their money to be able to fund it. It is all a bit of a lottery. you have a 1 in 400 chance of getting on a free FATPL course for a £147 ticket but you may think your chances are better than that if you feel you have more aptitude than your fellow applicants.

It could be you... but I doubt it!

[ 12 October 2001: Message edited by: Sir Algernon Scruggs ]

RickPhucked 12th Oct 2001 17:09

What if Malgus turn round after the interviews and say they couldn't find anyway who was good enough for the position, they are in there legal rights to, and can dissapear with a nice tidy sum. Strange that the company didnt exist up until 3 months ago, and also strange that it became a LTD, do they need financial protection etc? Why not setup as a charity?
This sounds pretty dodgy, particularly when a company that is supposed to be commiting nearly £1 million to training people has a home made website, can't they afford professional website engineers?

The Guvnor 12th Oct 2001 17:25

Wasn't there a similar thing a year or two ago which turned out to be a scam? I forget what it was called, but there were a number of rather extensive threads on the subject.

And yes, I agree with Rick*****ed - one would have thought that at the very least they would have had a more credible front than the one they present!

However, I don't see anything sinister in their using a limited liability company as their vehicle - though I do think that it would help, considerably, if the details of those involved with the company were made public: ie are they people with a AAA track record in the business, chancers, or known scam artists?

Another warning bell to me is their timing - right now, there are a lot of people out there who were hoping to get on courses which have evaporated. £147 is not too large a chunk of change for them to buy a lottery ticket with ... and I suspect that in earlier years (without the availability of sites such as this where people can share their concerns) many would do so. Yet what makes them think that they have a better chance for their 16 newly minted pilots than all the other airlines that have cancelled their trainee's courses?

Seems highly suspect to me!

rigidity 12th Oct 2001 17:45

It all sounds a bit too much like the Flying Start scam that got much publicity on this forum a while back. Resulting in strange letters announcing the cancelling of the scheme due to sudden illness within the company. Needless to say the company was never heard of again. :p :p :p

Token Bird 12th Oct 2001 18:33

Bear in mind that bmi is a part-sponsorship where the successful applicant has to provide £15,000 towards the training. I think this sum may have put more people off than the £50 application fee. Still, I think 6000 applicants is unlikely to happen.

As for Flying Start, I rang OATS at the time and they seemed to think it was on the level, in fact they were very insulted that I suspected it was a scam. Therefore just 'cos a company can fool a flight training establishment it doesn't mean they aren't dodgy,

TB

PS. As far as Malgus making money out of it, will it simply be from the application fees or are they planning to bind people into some horrible contract with crappy pay?

EGDR 12th Oct 2001 20:11

Once you do the sums I think it speaks for it's self. They may get enough people for 1 or 2 to go to Jerez but after that who knows. Those who do apply will probably do so once due to the cost and then where are the rest going to come from.

I would rather put the money towards the substantially costs of gaining a CPL/IR, exams, accomodation etc.....

From I personal point of view I would also be bitter about £147 which I would have to scrape together to probably finance somebody elses ATPL. ( I mean, I know I'm good but with these odd's....)

moggie 12th Oct 2001 20:40

I'm an instructor at BAE Jerez, and I have been told that the company is happy that Malgus are legit. Malgus themselves are using the money from the selection procedure to fund the courses and have also some kind of support from Scottish Enterprise (but I am not sure if that is financial, legal, business or just moral!).

I believe they have said that if insufficient numbers come forward they will refund the money in full (i guess they won't spend money on tests until they know how many applicants there are).

If they do not get 6400 applicants, they will put a lesser number of cadets through here. If they get more there will be more sponsorships to follow.

I am surprised that this thread is still here as any Malgus threads were being deleted yesterday because Malgus have declined to advertise here and PPRuNe don't want to give "free advertising" - as I was told by PPRuNePOP who closed the threads down.

I was also accused of being a trouble maker for raising that point - but there you go!

[ 12 October 2001: Message edited by: moggie ]

seekingfirstjob 12th Oct 2001 20:49

One thing that nobody seems to have noticed is the terms and conditions. If the course is not run it would seem that we get a full refund of our fee. Their website has details of the directors and the company is registered with companies house website.

As far as I can add up if they get around 700 people they can send 2 people to Jerez. not counting any fees to parc etc. so possibly they need 800 to send two to jerez and pay parc and still have a sum left over to pay their staff and bills etc. Its not the best offer but its on the table now and I for one cannot stump up the 32000 wanted for other sponsorships on offer. If not enough people apply will it still go ahead? I doubt it and I guess then it wont happen again.

WWW seems to think their legit so I guess its worth a shot.

Good luck to all

seekingfirstjob 12th Oct 2001 21:28

Hi all again

Just got off the phone with Malgus, as has been said they confirmed that the more people they get into the tests the more they can train. They didn't give any numbers etc but did stress the refund policy to me.

Apparently they are trying to advertise on pprune but have been told that all advertising slots are full for the next few weeks or so. Does anyone know if this is true?

Still Seekingfirstjob!

Wee Weasley Welshman 12th Oct 2001 21:40

I can say nothing more on this topic.

WWW

seekingfirstjob 12th Oct 2001 22:21

Dear friends

Once, a long time ago I used to frequent this site just as many of you do now. I stopped using the site over the past year as there were always the un-named people behind the scenes who decided to edit and control this, supposed, open speech forum.

I think that the un-named are at it again and their target is Malgus. I dont know what the problem is but if they are not letting Malgus advertise and stopping all threads about them then somebody somewhere must be taking this personally.

I for one am with Moggie who says let Malgus topics be discussed in open chat and let them advertise if they want.

As Malgus are a business then advertising must be the key to success.

I really hope that the attitude of those in charge of this site is not that of malice as they are harming any chance for the Malgus offer to work.

Don't get me wrong I think that PPRUNE is a great site for all us aviators to chat on but I just get sick of people controlling what we are allowed to see and read.

Sincerely

Seekingfirstjob.

Vref +50 12th Oct 2001 22:27

You lot must be mugs to fall for this.

It may well be a sound company but the whole premise is that there will be one place for every 400odd applicants.

Thats rubbish odds. Add your travel costs to the 4 sessions and you are looking at wasting well over £200 apiece.


You WON'T be the one to be selected will you. Lets face it:

a) They will only get enough applicants to send one or two people.

b) Of those one or two there might be one or two who apply who are in some way connected with the management of the scheme. A son of a friend of a friend for example... Oh sure he will have to pass the tests.... no question of him seeing the papers beforehand... and he was very good at interview.... completely impartial selection. Cough.

Get real people. If these people are airline pilots as they have claimed then you can bet their bottom dollar they have either friends or family members who want to be airline pilots like them. They went to the pub one night and came up with a most cunning idea for financing that ambition.

I wish I had thought of it first.

And they can be all above board about it. The only rule broken might be showing someone a test ahead of it being taken and then picking someone at interview whom you already know.

Neither of which is going to get anyone in jail or even found out.

Hey - presto, an ATPL course for the son/nephew/best mate.

There is no way this scheme is going to run for years and years is there...? There are only about 450 new pilots a year in the UK and they need this many just to send slightly less than one cadidate per annnum.

Wake up Boys and Girls - the coffees ready

:rolleyes:

Wee Weasley Welshman 12th Oct 2001 22:30

Well. What a suspicous man you are Vref +50. Shame on you.

WWW

Mooney 12th Oct 2001 22:34

I paid a lot of money to BAE for one of their spoof schemes in the past, in which no one ended up getting jobs.

A Very Civil Pilot 12th Oct 2001 22:49

Never heard of them, but the old adage "if it sounds too good to be true, it probably is" springs to mind. (As well as "there is no such thing as a free lunch; you don't get something for nothing", etc)

seekingfirstjob 12th Oct 2001 22:54

Its good to see that this thread hasn't been deleted yet, thank you oh god you tells me what to think.

Sorry folks just letting off steam

I was in the same mind as VRef + 50 until I spoke to Parc Aviation. They are running the selection scheme and Malgus has nothing to do with it.

The odds are bad but hey for 147 pounds you *could* get a free licence.

Who knows may be I'm suckered in too, but I can see how it would work.

BAE seem to say that they have nothing to do with the sponsorship also just to provide the training

may the comments roll on!

The Guvnor 13th Oct 2001 00:06

Spoke to Scottish Enterprise today - much consternation as they cannot understand why they should be backing something which isn't benefitting Scotland - or even involving Scottish based training. That said, they were rather surprised to hear that BAe is no longer at PIK!

Wasn't Flying Start also allegedly Scottish based?

What's their website url - and the names of the people involved?

Wee Weasley Welshman 13th Oct 2001 01:19

The thread won't be deleted. Email me if you have something to get off your chest.

WWW

Flypuppy 13th Oct 2001 02:33

It would be interesting to know what the connection is between Malgus and Flying Start. The concept seems exactly the same, the geographical location of the organising body is the same. Despite WWW's recommendation something just doesnt seem quite right.

Tell us Andy, what is the difference between this scheme and Flying Start?

rolling circle 13th Oct 2001 03:48

I was at Oxford when the Flying Start scam was running. The marketing bunch were putting out the same cr@p that BAe are putting out now - "We have been approached by ....... and are prepared to provide training for the appropriate fee". Don't be fooled by the salespeak, nobody is in the flight training business for your benefit, only for their own.

If you have £147 to throw away then good luck to you, but be under no illusions, you will be throwing it away.

***Real cargo doesn't complain - Ever!!!**

SuperSpanner 13th Oct 2001 04:26

Vref+50 is a very astute individual.

Malgus is an anagram of al mugs. :eek:

Next week I will have up my new phone in site where for a fee of £2.00 you will be able to register your name for the opportunity to win an all paid flight training programme. No catches, no tricks.

You may enter as many times as you wish, the charge will be added to your phone bill. It's just like the lottery, but better! :)

Don't let your ambition get the better of you!

TomPierce 13th Oct 2001 10:56

Vref+50 has posted an amusing but cynical post. But, in essence, what he says is right.

He makes good points and I quote from his post.



There is no way this scheme is going to run for years and years is there...? There are only about 450 new pilots a year in the UK and they need this many just to send slightly less than one cadidate per annnum.

This is almost true. The ACTUAL figure is ONE candidate goes for training for - every 470 who apply.

Have you sent your £147 yet?

:o

sammartin 13th Oct 2001 14:38

I've sent my £147, I've booked my trains and I've booked my flights. And I can tell you now - this is the the best chance any of you are going to get in the next 2 years without having to fork out £40000 for a ATPL.

schooner 13th Oct 2001 15:49


I think it was WWW who mentioned recently that only 600 applicants were prepared to pay the £50 appication fee for the last BMI CEP drive.
.

The reason only 600 applicants were prepared to pay that application fee is because they had been invited onto the next stage of the selection process. I`m sure if 1000 were invited, they would have all coughed up the necessary dosh. The number that actually applied from the off to the scheme was a lot more.
That said, 6000 applicants is a rather large number to shoot for, I would think they would be doing well to get enough applicants to fund one place, if that :rolleyes: .

Anyway, good luck :( to those who do apply, hope you don`t get stiffed

cheers,

Schooner

RickPhucked 13th Oct 2001 17:42

EnglishPilot I mean 'EnglishwannabePilot' you stupid, you would have a better chance on the lottery, or even playing the horses with your £200+ (cost+expenses), you could even of bought a couple of introductory lessons in flying to see whether you actually enjoy it. But Malgus aren't gonna give you your ATPL, they only been trading 3 months, isnt that strange!!! If you really wanna be a pilot you should apply to the British European Training Course, because at least you'd have a professional decision by an airline whether your a good enough person to employ, and ok you would have to pay £31,000 but im bloody sure that if you showed the bank you're acceptance on the scheme they would most definatly say YES.

EGDR 13th Oct 2001 19:33

Englishpilot - do you work for Malgus ? because you keep telling us you have booked your place/train fares and you keep telling us to apply before we 'miss the boat' ??????

sammartin 13th Oct 2001 20:30

Firstly, I already am a pilot with my PPL + Night, so don't patronise me. Secondly, I don't think you should keep putting people off going to Malgus because for people like me who have a genuine determination to get in to the top end of aviation (unlike you lot who can't even spare £147 for the chance), I do not think it is fair. All that you are doing is decreasing the amount of people that would have applied, which makes it harder for those who are applying to get on to this programme. Just keep your mouths shut if you aren't applying, leave it up to us, the people who are keen enough to get into flying, to decide.Thirdly, no, I do not work for Malgus. Fourthly, I have never EVER said "You will miss the boat if you don't apply" - all I have said is I think that malgus should get as many people as possible, to give everyone a better chance.

Springbok220 13th Oct 2001 21:08

Cut Englishpilot a bit of slack folks. He/ she sounds intelligent enough to weigh up the risks and chances and should be given some respect for making the decision and commitment to apply for the scheme.

I personally have not totally decided, but at this stage, think I will give it a go.

The Guvnor 13th Oct 2001 21:16

If it's a kosher scheme, then it shouldn't matter how many people apply. Of course, if it's a scam, then they need as many people as possible to take the cash from and run off laughing.

In fact, the fewer people apply, the better your chances of getting selected will be - if it's for real ... so if I was you, Englishpilot, I'd be warning everyone off it! :D :D :D

Wee Weasley Welshman 13th Oct 2001 22:12

Flypuppy - unlike Flying Start I have been able to speak on several occassions to the man behind Malgus, to his father and to his associates. I have checked his address, his employer and his own training history. I know who he is, what he does and where he lives.

I am therefore confident that this is NOT Flying Start II. Which at first I thought it was. Hence the investigation.

I leave it solely to the judgement of the individual Wannabe as to whether to apply. Judgement is such a critical skill in aviation.

WWW

Malgus 13th Oct 2001 22:28

Hi all

We appreciate that many of you are scared that we may be running a scam. We're not, I know it won't convince many of you, but we're not.

We do require a large number of people to make our offer valid and if we don't get near those numbers we can't run the offer.

All will get a full refund, and we will go back to the drawing board and to try and see how we can offer our sponsorship offer again and perhaps get more approval for a different offer.

Thank you for all who support and understand us in this hostile environment.

MALGUS

The Guvnor 13th Oct 2001 23:27

Malgus - can you confirm, then, that the figures provided elsewhere in this thread are correct and that this is merely a 1:470 lottery?

Also, can you clarify what the role is of Scottish Enterprise and what they think they are getting out of it?

Finally, what form of security or escrow account is provided by Malgus Ltd to ensure that all funds will be returned to the applicants if you decide not to go ahead with the programme?

I'm sure that your answers to those and the many other points raised in this thread will go a long way towards settling the doubts raised as to the validity of this scheme.

The Graduate 14th Oct 2001 00:42

It seems like the thread that I started is causing quite a lot of interest. Can I please ask though for this not to be use for insulting matches between individuals. Please keep the posts aimed at the topic in question. Thanks.

I myself am still not decided whether or not to go for it but I think I probably will. Yes it could be a scam and they could get our £147++, but then it could also be genuine. However, the ultimate question is can you/I really afford NOT to take the risk of losing 200 odd pounds when there is the possibility of essentially getting a free training? Someone afterall has to get the place (if there genuinely is one/two/...) and I want it to be me!

Not all of us can afford to pay our own way through an ATPL course and an offer like this, especially at the moment, is great (if it is legit)! It would be a lot cheaper to risk £147 and possibly lose it than to spend 40,000 pounds and still have no job guarentee.

I shall be calling the Scottish Enterprise, trading standards and anyone else that could confirm this offer or provide information and tips. Sorry Malgus, but you have to understand our scepticism. Will keep you all posted.

Please keep up the interesting views and if anyone has any further comments or info then please share! Thanks

The Graduate

Capt Rommel 14th Oct 2001 01:06

There should be a simple solution to this uncertainty. If it isn't a scam, Malgus should have no trouble getting an independent, tangible legal party to verify the authenticity of the scheme. Essentially, no matter whether the course itself is real or not, this is gambling against unlikely odds with a small increase in chance if you're outstandingly good, right? But just like any other form of gambling, a solicitor or similar should be able to oversee both that the price is real (BAe saying "a party has approached us" doesn't mean that), AND that the tests are administered in such a way that nobody associated with the scheme has a way, even themselves, to manipulate it. Wannabes could then approach this independent party for verification.

I don't know if this is even possible. But until it's proven, I'd be forced to agree with VRef and Rolling Circle etc. Too much mystery and uncertainty surround this scheme.

"If it smells like sh*t and looks like sh*t, it's probably sh*t...!"

Malgus should be able to shed some light on this.

moggie 14th Oct 2001 02:22

Come on chaps - you should know that prices agreed between an FTO and a customer (individual or airline) are confidential. However, I think anyone with a few grey cells should be able to see that there may be the odd "mid season sale2 or two under wya at the moment.

To tell the truth, I have NO IDEA what Malgus, BA, Air2K etc. pay - and anyone who says they do is using his imagination.

Capt Rommel 14th Oct 2001 02:32

Ah.

Mid-season sale? But Malgus must have started the planning for their scheme, including their spreadsheets, *way* before anyone could predict how this whole mess of 11/9 would affect the training industry.

Beyond that, airlines get considerable discounts from the big training outfits only because they do serious block bookings for their CEP people over repeated and long periods of time. Any airline - even with a tiny CEP scheme - is big compared to a scottish startup.

How can Malgus secure an almost 50% discount? The company can have no reliable forecast of how many people will apply, never mind get through the exams. How can they, then, secure a fixed discount rate from a training supplier?

And even if they did, how could this information leak into the public domain - assuming Malgus is a reputable company?

Mysteries, mysteries....

[ 13 October 2001: Message edited by: Capt Rommel ]

sammartin 14th Oct 2001 13:53

I agree with you AMS. Leave them alone, give them a chance to show us what they can do and go and apply! If you just keep slagging them off ALL the time, how the hell do you expect people who are really serious about this to get in? Just keep your opinions to yourself unless they're going to help Wannabe's get into the Malgus scheme. If you can afford £147 then go for it. If not, shut up.

InFinRetirement 14th Oct 2001 14:36

Thought for today! Had to come in with a few points.

OK. It's not a scam. Malgus are a legitimate company. They WILL place you in BaE/Jerez for training. Fine.

The odds of YOU getting selected for ONE place are 1 in 470. But first they have to get 470 people willing to pay £147 each - that may well take time. So it will not be quick.

So, some simple advice. First you have to decide if you are a participant. Then you have to decide if you have a realistic chance of getting through Parc Aviation's rigid selection process - they have been doing this for years and know their stuff.

Then, a few what if's?

3 actually pass all the tests on the first selection process. Only one is chosen. Are the remaining 2 then selected when the next process takes place? In fact, waiting for another 940 applicants to pay their £147 before they can? If that is the case the 940 will NOT get ONE place allocated to them!

Check the sums. What ifs are a natural function of business. They are also a natural function of decisions. I strongly suggest that read what Sir Algernon has written on page one, and then get down to making a decision. It's yours and yours alone, as WWW has said many times.

Finally. It's no good feeling all enthusiastic, raring to go, and getting annoyed with those who try to dissaude you. They have merely done the sums and feel it is not for them. You really should be doing the same - shouldn't you? Still your decision though.


All times are GMT. The time now is 17:56.


Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.