AFTA, Simtech, VA or any other school for APS MCC
Buon giorno
My last forum was closed and I even don't know why. So I start a new one with a similar title but without that S.. name because they or people from them react weird. I would like to give guidance and hints to those who want to do a APS MCC. So in the game you have the schools in the title. Would be good to have details for their APS programs Thank you |
And the recommendation is...
So what do you think? Is VA better than Simtech? I've read your last thread and highly appreciate some further info.
My friends recommend VA, but simtech looks professional and on their Facebook there is evidence for the success of their pilots. |
APS costs
Wings alliance is offering the APS for 7500 GBP
I paid around 6400 Euro VA is taking 6900 GBP Pilots ATO takes 5500 Euro What about Simtech and AFTA? |
Before you part with your hard earned cash, I would suggest that you visit the establishments on your shortlist. A 30 minute "trial flight" in the simulator should invariably be part of the conducted tour. Ask about how successful their customers have been in securing that all important first job. Personnal recommendations from trusted friends always goes a long way in the decision making process. Besides Facebook, LinkedIn is another source of valuable research. The bottom line is that you are the customer.........spend your money wisely |
Tried contacting VA but they never followed up unfortunately. I guess they are just too busy?
|
Originally Posted by Reverserbucket
(Post 10477824)
Tried contacting VA but they never followed up unfortunately. I guess they are just too busy?
Very sorry about that error on our part if you didn't get a follow-up. Will send you a private message now, and please do contact us again. |
Hello
Do you know Spanish flight schools with aps?
|
Originally Posted by virtualaviation
(Post 10478018)
We are busy, but certainly never too busy to reply! Very sorry about that error on our part if you didn't get a follow-up. Will send you a private message now, and please do contact us again. What's your price for the APS MCC? Just curious |
@travis.karl: On their website its written: £6,900 inc VAT (£5,750 ex VAT) so its 6.900 or 5.750 if you have a company related to flying. I believe it can also be deducted if you are not from UK just have an EU company and also written off from tax as a cost of getting the necessary ratings to perform your job.
@virtualaviation: May I ask if there is some kind of assessment or can I just join when I am done with my ratings at the flight school? I like your program best when looking at website information but I would like to ask if you have some contacts with Ryanair or planning to be officially approved like sky4u or AFTA ? Do you have any contact or students who got a job with other airlines for example: Wizz Air, LOT Polish Airlines, Enter Air, Sprint Air, Travel Service (those airlines got bases in Poland, maybe Easyjet will also have bases in Poland) ? |
Originally Posted by KT1988
(Post 10478707)
@travis.karl: On their website its written: £6,900 inc VAT (£5,750 ex VAT) so its 6.900 or 5.750 if you have a company related to flying. I believe it can also be deducted if you are not from UK just have an EU company and also written off from tax as a cost of getting the necessary ratings to perform your job.
@virtualaviation: May I ask if there is some kind of assessment or can I just join when I am done with my ratings at the flight school? I like your program best when looking at website information but I would like to ask if you have some contacts with Ryanair or planning to be officially approved like sky4u or AFTA ? Do you have any contact or students who got a job with other airlines for example: Wizz Air, LOT Polish Airlines, Enter Air, Sprint Air, Travel Service (those airlines got bases in Poland, maybe Easyjet will also have bases in Poland) ? |
Originally Posted by KT1988
(Post 10478707)
@travis.karl: On their website its written: £6,900 inc VAT (£5,750 ex VAT) so its 6.900 or 5.750 if you have a company related to flying. I believe it can also be deducted if you are not from UK just have an EU company and also written off from tax as a cost of getting the necessary ratings to perform your job.
@virtualaviation: May I ask if there is some kind of assessment or can I just join when I am done with my ratings at the flight school? I like your program best when looking at website information but I would like to ask if you have some contacts with Ryanair or planning to be officially approved like sky4u or AFTA ? Do you have any contact or students who got a job with other airlines for example: Wizz Air, LOT Polish Airlines, Enter Air, Sprint Air, Travel Service (those airlines got bases in Poland, maybe Easyjet will also have bases in Poland) ? APS students from Simtech and VA are taken by RYR too. So it's simply that they prefer APS students. But still it's a lot of money that you need to pay for something that is normally not needed and covered by an airline. Too expensive. And no guarantee. |
T.K What you must remember is that the more time you spent in the simulator before your interview/sim ride, the greater chance you have of being successful. Equally important is the device you learn on. If you aspire to say Ryanair then clearly a B737-800 training device is the obvious choice. If however you set your sights on a turbo-prop, then the choice of device is not critical. APS in essence means that the JOC element which historically was and remains unregulated, has now been approved and is part of the MCC course, now renamed APS. The reputable provider offered a MCC/JOC course. With some minor modifications that is now an APS course. Depending where you go, a current MCC/JOC course may well be the same standard and quality as the APS course. I suspect the issue with Ryanair was that they had a number of candidates who simply had got overwhelmed on the sim ride, wasting both their time and that of the assessors. Hence their preference for those who have reached a certain defined standards prior to assessment. Expensive it may be, but money well spent if you are successful. The cheaper the option, then potentially a greater risk of failure, and 'money down the drain'. Training is an investment. There are no quick fixes. Think QUALITY every time. |
I am sorry I strongly disagree with these overpriced programs. They will not prepare you for an airline assessment for various reasons:
1. You don't know what type you will be checked on. (A320, 737, Embraer or other) 2. The date you do such a course can be months or even years before you get a real chance, unless practiced regularly it will give you little help by the time you finally have an assessment. 3. As a Cadet they will not be assessing you for failures etc. If you are non type rated they will check your general flying / handling skills. The HR interview will in 90% of the cases by equally as important as the sim. 4. MCC is the regulatory requirement, get the one that is "cheapest" possible, save your money until you know you have an interview / assessment. Then book Sim with instructor, same type as assessment. Most sim profiles for assessment for companies like RyR, Wizz, Ezy, BA and more, are available, and you book one or more Sim sessions shortly before your assessment date, and practice exactly what you will be expected to perform in your assessment. 5. No airline will give if you have some Certificate from either of these places, equally from places like Oxford etc., you doing a MCC course spending a few thousands, while they have integrated cadets spending over 100.000 Euros, will not count for the same from the FTO if they do have a connection with airlines. EASA requires you have a MCC only, some airlines asks for a JOC, again if you do have to do it, do it as cheap as possible, as this has very little value when applying for a job, besides that you have to have it on your CV. Rather spend 1000 - 1500 Euro on a Sim when you have an assessment, save your money until then. |
Originally Posted by 2unlimited
(Post 10480312)
I am sorry I strongly disagree with these overpriced programs. They will not prepare you for an airline assessment for various reasons:
1. You don't know what type you will be checked on. (A320, 737, Embraer or other) 2. The date you do such a course can be months or even years before you get a real chance, unless practiced regularly it will give you little help by the time you finally have an assessment. 3. As a Cadet they will not be assessing you for failures etc. If you are non type rated they will check your general flying / handling skills. The HR interview will in 90% of the cases by equally as important as the sim. 4. MCC is the regulatory requirement, get the one that is "cheapest" possible, save your money until you know you have an interview / assessment. Then book Sim with instructor, same type as assessment. Most sim profiles for assessment for companies like RyR, Wizz, Ezy, BA and more, are available, and you book one or more Sim sessions shortly before your assessment date, and practice exactly what you will be expected to perform in your assessment. 5. No airline will give if you have some Certificate from either of these places, equally from places like Oxford etc., you doing a MCC course spending a few thousands, while they have integrated cadets spending over 100.000 Euros, will not count for the same from the FTO if they do have a connection with airlines. EASA requires you have a MCC only, some airlines asks for a JOC, again if you do have to do it, do it as cheap as possible, as this has very little value when applying for a job, besides that you have to have it on your CV. Rather spend 1000 - 1500 Euro on a Sim when you have an assessment, save your money until then. Botton line, set the attitude, set the thrust & TRIM. THEN hold trim check adjust...... 2. Whilst the market is buoyant Junior birdmen are being invited for interview / sim ride within weeks of completing the MCC. You actually hear of them attempting the process BEFORE or during the MCC course. NOT RECOMMENDED 3. Not entirely true. Smoke in the cabin as an emergency has been known for non typed pilots. Good CRM is vital. Competent skills in both seats as PF & PM critical. If you cannot operate as a crew member, the HR part will be irrelevant. 4. This would be a valid statement, provided you are competent in the first place. 5. Where you train is irrelevant if you cannot fly for toffee. Integrated courses never guarantees success. You need to be competent irrespective of your background. If there is a gap of more than 28 days between completing the course and the sim ride then a "top up" sim practice needs to be considered. |
Originally Posted by parkfell
(Post 10479881)
T.K What you must remember is that the more time you spent in the simulator before your interview/sim ride, the greater chance you have of being successful. Equally important is the device you learn on. If you aspire to say Ryanair then clearly a B737-800 training device is the obvious choice. If however you set your sights on a turbo-prop, then the choice of device is not critical. APS in essence means that the JOC element which historically was and remains unregulated, has now been approved and is part of the MCC course, now renamed APS. The reputable provider offered a MCC/JOC course. With some minor modifications that is now an APS course. Depending where you go, a current MCC/JOC course may well be the same standard and quality as the APS course. I suspect the issue with Ryanair was that they had a number of candidates who simply had got overwhelmed on the sim ride, wasting both their time and that of the assessors. Hence their preference for those who have reached a certain defined standards prior to assessment. Expensive it may be, but money well spent if you are successful. The cheaper the option, then potentially a greater risk of failure, and 'money down the drain'. Training is an investment. There are no quick fixes. Think QUALITY every time. The APS is completely unnecessary. Rather spend your money with a good MCC on a FFS. And you still pay less than for an APS. For a standard MCC which one from UK/Ireland so you recommend? In Germany Cockpit4u, TFC Kaeufer and RWL are the biggest schools with the highest standards. |
Originally Posted by travis.karl
(Post 10480715)
Regarding quality I agree with you. But regarding necessity I agree with 2unlimited.
The APS is completely unnecessary. Rather spend your money with a good MCC on a FFS. And you still pay less than for an APS. For a standard MCC which one from UK/Ireland so you recommend? In Germany Cockpit4u, TFC Kaeufer and RWL are the biggest schools with the highest standards. |
Originally Posted by parkfell
(Post 10480401)
1. Irrespective of what device is used, you need to be competent at RAW DATA flying, and if light ac is your background then the power/pitch couple together with interia are new the ingredients which require training & practice. Botton line, set the attitude, set the thrust & TRIM. THEN hold trim check adjust...... 2. Whilst the market is buoyant Junior birdmen are being invited for interview / sim ride within weeks of completing the MCC. You actually hear of them attempting the process BEFORE or during the MCC course. NOT RECOMMENDED 3. Not entirely true. Smoke in the cabin as an emergency has been known for non typed pilots. Good CRM is vital. Competent skills in both seats as PF & PM critical. If you cannot operate as a crew member, the HR part will be irrelevant. 4. This would be a valid statement, provided you are competent in the first place. 5. Where you train is irrelevant if you cannot fly for toffee. Integrated courses never guarantees success. You need to be competent irrespective of your background. If there is a gap of more than 28 days between completing the course and the sim ride then a "top up" sim practice needs to be considered. If you done one or the other, it will only confuse you to criss cross between the two. Boeing is a cluttered piece of junk from the 60's, while Airbus slightly newer flying computer. 2. The market is not that buoyant for inexperienced cadets, there is a high failure rate, as there are so many cadets to choose from. Whenever companies like RyR opens up recruitment, they normally have several thousand applications, of those they will only hire 20 - 30 at a time. Now also loads of experienced pilots looking for jobs after Monarch, WoW, Air Berlin and other companies gone bust. Many companies are now taking these experienced guys first, as it helps them ease up on their training department. 3. Sure basic skills of CRM you get during your MCC, basic skills is what is needed. They don't expect that you are a complete pilot when you join as a cadet, because they want to teach you from scratch, to make sure you don't have any bad habits that you might have picked up during your initial training. Most airlines now want you shaped into their ethos of how to operate. Their SOP's and their way of thinking. Getting smoke etc. are very complex drills, and if given during an assessment for a Cadet, then this I fell is grossly unfair and wrong, and has nothing to do in an assessment of non TR cadet. Unless he has experience on other type I would not expect to see this given. Without a good HR interview, you won't even get the time in the Sim by the company. 4. With good preparation and 1 or 2 Sim sessions in a FFS on same type as will be used for assessment, you should be more then enough ready, any competent trainer that knows the Sim drills that are used, can get this done nicely over a 4 hours sim session, with brief and debrief. Of course some self study in advance is required. To prepare yourself for the profiles required. 5. My point with the integrated courses is that many of them already have agreements with airlines, and the Cadets from this group will always have priority with regards to job placement ahead of anyone doing some advanced MCC/JOC course. As I mention, anyone can get interview with Ryanair, even without these packages, of course if you do get interview/sim, you should prepare properly, that's when you need you Sim time. |
If you knew for certain that your sim ride was on the Airbus, then choosing the Bus for the MCC is fine. You might be a tagged student for say EZY then MCC on it makes sense. Otherwise as a newly qualified CPL/IR hot from a DA42, still requires to gain basic skills which is best achieved using B737, aka “a cluttered piece of junk from the 60’s” as described by 2Unlimited True the A320 will be easier to fly. But that is not what you want just yet. YOU NEED TO GAIN THE BASIC SKILLS FIRST and not take the easier option just yet with auto trim etc. Do not waste your money on a FFS. A fixed based sim is better as this stage, as you get no sensation to help you, and therefore must rely solely on your ability to scan. If you can demonstrate basic handling skills, with good CRM you will be successful. |
uncle dickie;
Thank you for the input. I'm looking for a school to do my MCC or APS but haven't decided yet. Reading some reports here and there are a lot of pros and cons for each. My budget limits me but I want to invest in the best way. Because you find more A320 in Europe I think it will be on that one. I'm not looking for Ryan more for easy or Brussels. What do you think? And they only require a standard MCC. |
Originally Posted by robingre991
(Post 10481268)
uncle dickie;
Thank you for the input. I'm looking for a school to do my MCC or APS but haven't decided yet. Reading some reports here and there are a lot of pros and cons for each. My budget limits me but I want to invest in the best way. Because you find more A320 in Europe I think it will be on that one. I'm not looking for Ryan more for easy or Brussels. What do you think? And they only require a standard MCC. |
Originally Posted by robingre991
(Post 10481268)
uncle dickie;
Thank you for the input. I'm looking for a school to do my MCC or APS but haven't decided yet. Reading some reports here and there are a lot of pros and cons for each. My budget limits me but I want to invest in the best way. Because you find more A320 in Europe I think it will be on that one. I'm not looking for Ryan more for easy or Brussels. What do you think? And they only require a standard MCC. |
CRM Europe's CEO wrote a meaningful post
Just check their website. Can't post a link cuz I'm new here. Words to think about...
|
Rob Howard's comment on APS
Hey there.
Usually I'm not doing this but have a look at this comment. It's about important facts to consider before you take an APS MCC. https://www.pprune.org/professional-...l#post10490456 Or visit CRM Europe's news section. |
Originally Posted by 737fan
(Post 10490146)
Just found an offer for A320 based APS MCC in Hungary. Cost is 5499 Euro. School is Pilots ATO in Budapest. Could be interesting for you.
I will contact Pilots ATO. AFTA not replying. Maybe too many mail request. Decided against Sky4u although some friends recommended. Now some of my friends say if they knew before would go to another flight school. Thanks here for your support. |
Originally Posted by robingre991
(Post 10492072)
Merci beaucoup!
I will contact Pilots ATO. AFTA not replying. Maybe too many mail request. Decided against Sky4u although some friends recommended. Now some of my friends say if they knew before would go to another flight school. Thanks here for your support. please checkout some standard MCC providers too. TFC, RWL and Cockpit4u are good flight schools with a high number of school leavers finding a job in a relatively short time frame. All without an APS. |
Spanish flight school
Result of my research is that we don't have any Spanish FS offering APS
But gossip is that it's in the planning. I think it will be with one major like FTE. Can't wait so long. I will visit VA and Simtech first. Then maybe Cockpit4u if I get a cheap ticket |
Originally Posted by Trevi85
(Post 10495912)
Result of my research is that we don't have any Spanish FS offering APS
But gossip is that it's in the planning. I think it will be with one major like FTE. Can't wait so long. I will visit VA and Simtech first. Then maybe Cockpit4u if I get a cheap ticket |
Originally Posted by travis.karl
(Post 10499960)
While the APS was hyped for several months it became clear by now that it didn't get the attention and the big numbers some schools hoped for. Standard MCC numbers at most traditional flight schools are steady and somewhat constant. That's what I heard. I'm happy that most students didn't run into this trap.
Having been in the position within the last 10 years looking for my first job, I can fully understand the frustration some feel when they have spent a small fortune completing their CPL/IR. Equally I would advice someone who is in their mid / late 20's or early/mid 30's, that getting stuck into an airline straight away, might seem great at first, but specially in the LCC industry, many face burnout within 10 - 15 years, some even faster, and only option to continue working is going part time. In the mind of someone applying for their first job, just desperate to fly, this might sound crazy as all they wish at this moment of time is to fly as much as possible, this notion will eventually change with most guys after they have been "abused" enough. I am not wanting to deter people from a flying career, just telling it how it is. So enjoy flying when you can, chances with airlines does come for most sooner or later. It took me about 18 months from completing my training to get my first job. Some guys even faster, the frustration is great during that initial search, but it's easy to think another extra "Sim course" is going to make it easier, or solve the problem to get the job. I will repeat what I have said before, save your money, use it wisely, when you get the interview with a specific airline, that's when it's time to splash the cash on sim session, to prepare for that specific airline. |
Originally Posted by Trevi85
(Post 10495912)
Result of my research is that we don't have any Spanish FS offering APS
But gossip is that it's in the planning. I think it will be with one major like FTE. Can't wait so long. I will visit VA and Simtech first. Then maybe Cockpit4u if I get a cheap ticket |
Update for RYR candidates
Many new cadets invited and passed RYR with MCC only, most of them no APS students. On other hand many APS students failed. That's what I heard from inside.
|
Originally Posted by 737fan
(Post 10501631)
Many new cadets invited and passed RYR with MCC only, most of them no APS students. On other hand many APS students failed. That's what I heard from inside.
1. Have you misheard what you were told? Was this just an off the cuff remark ~ a throw away line ? Just how close to the throne was your inside source? In essence, is this snippet actually true & the stats confirm it. 2. Taking your comment on face value, it cannot say much about the quality of certain providers who conduct APS? Were those who attended APS courses, and failed Ryanair selection recognised by the providers as very marginal at best, and just scraped a PASS by the skin of their teeth? 3. A competent junior birdman attending a MCC or MCC/JOC at a quality provider will undoubtedly be successful. They do need to have been taught well during the light ac phrase. They then produce these basics skills during MCC viz. selecting an attitude and accurate trimming. It is as straightforward as that. The MCC then teaches the 2 crew skills for PF & PM. If I had to express a view on the quotation, I would challenge the veracity of the statement. Half truths at best? |
~50% of MCC holders fail their RYR assessment ~25% of APS MCC holders fail their RYR assessment Not much more to say really. |
Originally Posted by MaverickPrime
(Post 10502134)
~50% of MCC holders fail their RYR assessment ~25% of APS MCC holders fail their RYR assessment Not much more to say really. I know before APS MCC the pass rate of MCC holders was 100%. |
Originally Posted by 2unlimited
(Post 10502169)
And whats the source for your stats?
I know before APS MCC the pass rate of MCC holders was 100%. It would be truly remarkable if 100% success rate occurred for any group. It would be interesting to analyse the actual success rate of those who complete purely MCC 4/5, and those who complete a MCC/JOC course. The issue is that as the JOC element is not regulated, there are no mandatory elements. Reputable providers however will be offering fairly similar courses covering the elements specified by EASA for APS. The quote is most likely a wind up to provoke reaction. Porkies? |
Good afternoon all,
We can confirm what MaverickPrime said about assessment stats. This information is also available on our career page. Our statistics show that over 50% of newly qualified pilots who hold a CPL, frozen ATPL theoretical exams, ME/IR and a standard MCC fail at the initial assessment. Thank you |
I see Skyborne Airline Academy are offering APS MCC on their new B737 Max simulator at their base at Gloucestershire airport
|
Originally Posted by RYRCadetRecruitment
(Post 10502642)
Good afternoon all,
We can confirm what MaverickPrime said about assessment stats. This information is also available on our career page. Our statistics show that over 50% of newly qualified pilots who hold a CPL, frozen ATPL theoretical exams, ME/IR and a standard MCC fail at the initial assessment. Thank you |
Originally Posted by RYRCadetRecruitment
(Post 10502642)
Good afternoon all,
We can confirm what MaverickPrime said about assessment stats. This information is also available on our career page. Our statistics show that over 50% of newly qualified pilots who hold a CPL, frozen ATPL theoretical exams, ME/IR and a standard MCC fail at the initial assessment. Thank you So the potential for a seamless transition from MCC to type rating for junior birdmen. |
VA and RYR
VA is high quality. I have many coworkers that have completed their training at VA. But I still don't get the point why APS is that much advertised
|
@parkfell: Did VA become Ryanair officaly approved APS MCC provider like AFTA and Sky4U ? That would be perfect since their offer for APS MCC looked most interesting.
I checked on their website it looks like a new program appeared like 2 days ago and its a Ryanair approved program, ofc. there is an extra assessment included to prepare for as bonus to the regular Ryanair assessment (that should be everything). Wonder if they made it relevant to flying like the later real assessment or if they created some DLR like stuff that does require a lot of lengthy preparation but is of no use in real flying. Hopefully they made it relevant to flying and someone will give some feedback about it before its my turn to apply. |
All times are GMT. The time now is 08:58. |
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.