Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Wannabes Forums > Professional Pilot Training (includes ground studies)
Reload this Page >

Kai Tak - really as spectacular as they say ?

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Professional Pilot Training (includes ground studies) A forum for those on the steep path to that coveted professional licence. Whether studying for the written exams, training for the flight tests or building experience here's where you can hang out.

Kai Tak - really as spectacular as they say ?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 23rd May 2001 | 00:29
  #1 (permalink)  
Invaribly
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Post Kai Tak - really as spectacular as they say ?

Well...is it ,and if so i would be interested in some interesting sites for good photos(apart from !!!!!!!!!!!!!!).
Did anyone out there ever exceed the 47 degree bank by much and if so how much.
Also what is the most tough/difficult airport to land in these days ,that deals with a regular flow of commercial traffic?Is Mexico city ,La gaurdia and National as bad as they say.
Finally ,is there an official list out there
that ranks the top 10 most 'challenging'airports?
cheers.
 
Old 23rd May 2001 | 01:15
  #2 (permalink)  
Superpilot
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Wink

A 47 degree bank? Hell no!!!





This is about a 47 degree turn, and rarely, depending upon local wind conditions, would it require more than a 20 degree banked turn.

So the turn from checker to the runway was 47 degrees (is that what you meant?)

[This message has been edited by Superpilot (edited 22 May 2001).]
 
Old 23rd May 2001 | 01:25
  #3 (permalink)  
wxjedi
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Exclamation

Used to fly into London City and it is a nightmare on a bad gusty day. Its not supposed to be pretty in there is just a matter of gettin it on and stoppin.
 
Old 23rd May 2001 | 21:36
  #4 (permalink)  
DeltaTango
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Post

why 47?
LOC is at 088track to RWY13. That would make it a 42 degree turn but the actuall degrees you would have to turn would deppend on the wind.
If you were doing this approach would mean (most likely) that the wind was comming from the suuth(ish), so because of crabb the actuall turn would be smaller....?!?!?!?

Only my understanding of the chart-don't shoot me

DT
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.