Wikiposts
Search
Professional Pilot Training (includes ground studies) A forum for those on the steep path to that coveted professional licence. Whether studying for the written exams, training for the flight tests or building experience here's where you can hang out.

Winds Aloft?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 25th Oct 2001, 17:34
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 295
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post Winds Aloft?

A question regarding using the internet as a resource for flight planning:

At my flying school, we are encouraged to ring the tower before planning any X country flight and asking for the winds aloft. The tower then reads back said speeds and temps for given altitudes and we then use these to plan.

I have heard that such figures are available on the internet but other than using the Met Office Form 214 charts - where you have to interpolate wind speeds - I cannot find such a service that gives you the same info that ATC give us when we ring the tower.

Does anybody know of such a website?

When ATC give me winds aloft are they simply using data that they too have had to interpolate?

MB
monkeyboy is offline  
Old 25th Oct 2001, 17:45
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: No longer on Pprune
Posts: 381
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Sure, Go to
http://www.met-office.gov.uk/

Sign up and it's all there, gratis too for a change, no premium rate phone me back fax no's, all free now. Interesting to see how this came about too.

PS
Polar_stereographic is offline  
Old 25th Oct 2001, 20:36
  #3 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 295
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Thanks PS but unless I'm not looking hard enough the Met Office website still requires you to interpolate the speeds (F214). If this is all ATC are doing when I ring them then fine I can live with that. I just can't see ATC going to the met office website like everybody else, interpolating the figures from F214, and then giving the info to people like me.
monkeyboy is offline  
Old 25th Oct 2001, 21:41
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: E London and Plymouth
Posts: 83
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Cool

go to the Met Office Website and click on Airmets.

See Airmets
stolport is offline  
Old 26th Oct 2001, 11:39
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: No longer on Pprune
Posts: 381
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Monkeyboy,

Consider the interpolation (?) good practice for when you sit the Met practical. I'm assuming the JAR ATPL's are not disimilar to the National ones, as for that you had to interpolate a whole route's worth and work out the average wind speed and direction. IIRC, I had to do London to Jo'burg.

PS


Edited for useless spelling - why can't I spell?

[ 26 October 2001: Message edited by: Polar_stereographic ]
Polar_stereographic is offline  
Old 26th Oct 2001, 13:13
  #6 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 295
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Stolport, thank you very much! That looks like what I'm after.

PS, I know I should get into the practice of inter-whatyacallingit. I'll try not to be too lazy in future!

Thanks

MB
monkeyboy is offline  
Old 26th Oct 2001, 14:51
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Try this one it's free to register:
web page

Even when you have to interpolate from wind charts, the information given in the forecast is best guess only.

This is often highlighted when the IRS wind readout that we have dislayed on EFIS can vary considerably from forecast winds aloft.

I always find it easier to just use the information as a guide. i.e approx direction/strong/light etc.

After all when I'm flying light aircraft I feel pretty chuffed with myself if I can fly a heading +/-5deg. Which in itself is probably a bigger error than the approx wind information that you were using to plan with.

It is not an exact science, and the winds aloft that ATC pass you may well be very different from a short distance away.

Hope this helps.
nullwww.wxsupport.com

[ 26 October 2001: Message edited by: whoop-whoop ]
whoop-whoop is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.