Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Wannabes Forums > Professional Pilot Training (includes ground studies)
Reload this Page >

ATPL GNAV theory question about relative bearing RB

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Professional Pilot Training (includes ground studies) A forum for those on the steep path to that coveted professional licence. Whether studying for the written exams, training for the flight tests or building experience here's where you can hang out.

ATPL GNAV theory question about relative bearing RB

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 21st January 2025 | 08:50
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Jan 2020
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
From: France
ATPL GNAV theory question about relative bearing RB

Hi to all, I need your help please on that question please:
A pilot spots a landmark on a relative bearing of 314°. The present compass heading is 255°, the variation is 26° W and the deviation is +2. What true bearing should be drawn from the chart to the
landmark?

001 ° 185° 005° 067° (apparently 005°) WHY?
I tried using this illustration joinded:



and a drawing but still cant find it. Many thanks!!
xplanefactor is offline  
Old 21st January 2025 | 14:44
  #2 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 324
Likes: 0
From: Sunny Solihull
Talk about making life difficult along with not the best worded question plus an incorrect answer (as asked).

1. Resolve C D M V T = 255+2=257-26=231 True Heading (as answer wants True)

2. TH 231+RB 314 = 545-360=185 True bearing from aircraft/chart TO the landmark, so given the wording of the question 185 is the answer not 005.

However, in a more practical application you would usually plot from a fixed position (landmark) so you would take the reciprocal 185-180=005. Protractor on landmark, draw out 005(T) the aircraft is somewhere along that line then get another bearing from another station at least 60 degrees apart draw another line & you get an approximate fix.

A word of friendly advice, when others go to the effort of answering your questions for free (like I did for Polar Stereo) it would be appreciated you at least acknowledge our efforts afterwards.
RichardH
RichardH is offline  
Old 26th January 2025 | 09:34
  #3 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Jan 2020
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
From: France
Originally Posted by RichardH
Talk about making life difficult along with not the best worded question plus an incorrect answer (as asked).

1. Resolve C D M V T = 255+2=257-26=231 True Heading (as answer wants True)

2. TH 231+RB 314 = 545-360=185 True bearing from aircraft/chart TO the landmark, so given the wording of the question 185 is the answer not 005.

However, in a more practical application you would usually plot from a fixed position (landmark) so you would take the reciprocal 185-180=005. Protractor on landmark, draw out 005(T) the aircraft is somewhere along that line then get another bearing from another station at least 60 degrees apart draw another line & you get an approximate fix.

A word of friendly advice, when others go to the effort of answering your questions for free (like I did for Polar Stereo) it would be appreciated you at least acknowledge our efforts afterwards.
RichardH
Dear Richard, many thanks for your answers, I am taking the time to read them and understand them fully, but your answers at very much appreciated!! Keep you posted, best!
xplanefactor is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.