Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Wannabes Forums > Professional Pilot Training (includes ground studies)
Reload this Page >

most valuable logbook time for first 500 hours

Wikiposts
Search
Professional Pilot Training (includes ground studies) A forum for those on the steep path to that coveted professional licence. Whether studying for the written exams, training for the flight tests or building experience here's where you can hang out.

most valuable logbook time for first 500 hours

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 8th Jan 2016, 23:22
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Coeur d'Alene, ID
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
most valuable logbook time for first 500 hours

My son is only 13 but is nuts about airplanes and flying and insists he wants to fly for a living. Right now he's been flying with me in my experimental backcountry taildragger.

Because of my work I have the ability to get him set up with his own plane for building hours and we have a fair bit of flexibility on what we get short of a jet or helicopter.

What are the most "valuable" hours for him to have in his logbook when he starts looking for jobs?

I would assume twin time is pretty important. If so, does the type of twin matter when employers are looking for entry level pilots? IOW, does it have to be high performance (>402 hp) if it's complex?
harrisonaero is offline  
Old 9th Jan 2016, 05:08
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: White Waltham, Prestwick & Calgary
Age: 72
Posts: 4,156
Likes: 0
Received 29 Likes on 14 Posts
Insurance companies do not live in the real world - at that stage, quantity counts, not quality, so the cheapest, ropiest (but still safe) aircraft will do, subject to verifiability. Any twin but the push-me-pull-you should do - PA34 springs to mind? Again, at that stage, quantity, not quality.

phil
paco is offline  
Old 10th Jan 2016, 20:34
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Devon
Posts: 96
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Seems very early to be thinking of an aircraft for a 13 year old given that he cannot fly solo as a student until 16 and no licence until 17. Rather than the type of aircraft, the quality of flying will count for most. Accurate nav exs of gradually increasing complexity, beacon tracking, accurate flying and above all increasing situational awareness is what counts.
mykul10 is offline  
Old 12th Jan 2016, 22:31
  #4 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Coeur d'Alene, ID
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Starting him out in gliders and then going from there. Working on strategy vs tactics.
harrisonaero is offline  
Old 13th Jan 2016, 03:59
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: White Waltham, Prestwick & Calgary
Age: 72
Posts: 4,156
Likes: 0
Received 29 Likes on 14 Posts
A good point - gliding is a very good foundation, especially if mountain flying is later on the agenda.

phil
paco is offline  
Old 21st Jan 2016, 19:12
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 76
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
PIC hours, IFR hours, depending on the type of job twin hours. Companies will not differentiate between complex and not complex. SEP hours are not worth a lot to begin with, neither are hours that were written years before looking for the first job.
So indeed I would begin with something like gliding and move on to building more expensive twin IFR hours as PIC when he's at the age to obtain a licence.
lalbak is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.