Wikiposts
Search
Professional Pilot Training (includes ground studies) A forum for those on the steep path to that coveted professional licence. Whether studying for the written exams, training for the flight tests or building experience here's where you can hang out.

Structured Modular vs Integrated

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 30th Oct 2012, 23:31
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Structured Modular vs Integrated

Hi!

I've been researching for quite some time and the integrated option doesn't look too good at the moment. Modular is the way I might conduct my flight training but seeing schools offering modular courses that are structured, I question isn't it the same as Integrated?

BCFT and AST (perth) come to mind with their flying courses where they offer modular courses that are structured, meaning you can do the full PPL>CPL/IR within 14 months or so. Whereas with the "big 3" you can do the same course in the same (ish) time frame but it's a little more expensive? So isn't it the same?

Can someone enlightening me with this predicament I have?
Lakhan is offline  
Old 31st Oct 2012, 01:16
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: EU
Posts: 626
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What are BCFT saying their 'structure' is?
pudoc is offline  
Old 31st Oct 2012, 04:45
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: White Waltham, Prestwick & Calgary
Age: 72
Posts: 4,149
Likes: 0
Received 29 Likes on 14 Posts
An interated course is a tightly linked mix of ground school and flying that is retsrictive in may ways and is not always popular with operators because you end up with so few hours. That said, those schools that do it, do it well. The big problem with it is that you don't see the fruits of your labours (i.e. your licence) until you graduate.

Structured modular is a more flexible route that takes you away from the daft regulations that exist for integrated. You might call it guided modular as well. One advantage is that you gain your PPL early on and if any free flying comes up you can take advantage of it.
paco is offline  
Old 31st Oct 2012, 12:16
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 1,365
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I think the likes of BCFT are trying to play to the requirements of airlines like Flybe who specify that if you go modular, all the training must be done at one school (apart from PPL).

The structure they are offering is no different to what you could come up with on your own with an Excel spreadsheet, but it is nice to have a timeline fairly well in place with the school, as it keeps you on track and stops the spending running away with you with extra hours or groundschool here or there.

lots of schools offer "structured hourbuilding" however, you may well find there is no structure at all. Ultimately it's up to you to make the most of the hour building phase. BCFT have plenty of aircraft available for this, so long trips away certainly shouldn't be a problem.
RTN11 is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.