Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Wannabes Forums > Professional Pilot Training (includes ground studies)
Reload this Page >

Speed stability differences between a jet aircraft and a propeller-driven aircraft

Wikiposts
Search
Professional Pilot Training (includes ground studies) A forum for those on the steep path to that coveted professional licence. Whether studying for the written exams, training for the flight tests or building experience here's where you can hang out.

Speed stability differences between a jet aircraft and a propeller-driven aircraft

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 28th Jul 2012, 17:52
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Belfast
Age: 33
Posts: 98
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Speed stability differences between a jet aircraft and a propeller-driven aircraft

Hi folks in the book i'm reading it states;

The jet aircrafts speed stability is much poorer than that of a propeller driven aircraft because of the following reason;

Thrust changes with speed, which helps to improve the speed stability on propeller-driven aircraft and does not improve it on jet aircraft

Basically i don't understand it, and would appreciate it if somebody could elaborate
akafrank07 is offline  
Old 29th Jul 2012, 06:53
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: White Waltham, Prestwick & Calgary
Age: 72
Posts: 4,154
Likes: 0
Received 29 Likes on 14 Posts
Very briefly, 'cos I'm in a rush:

The speed range below L/DMAX in a jet is the speed unstable regime. That above it is the speed stable regime. In the speed stable regime, power is added to increase speed, as normal. In the speed unstable regime, however, power has to be added to maintain a slower speed, and there is less of a tendency to return to trim speed anyway, so control movements must be more precise.

It's not all you need but it's a start.....
paco is offline  
Old 30th Jul 2012, 23:43
  #3 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Belfast
Age: 33
Posts: 98
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks for your help paco i just noticed the reply

'In the speed unstable regime, however, power has to be added to maintain a slower speed and there is less of a tendency to return to trim speed anyway, so control movements must be more precise.'

In that quote does that mean that the power was added to maintain a slower speed from when it was initially disturbed? if that's so, it makes scene now
cheers
akafrank07 is offline  
Old 31st Jul 2012, 06:19
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: White Waltham, Prestwick & Calgary
Age: 72
Posts: 4,154
Likes: 0
Received 29 Likes on 14 Posts
Yes it does!

Phil
paco is offline  
Old 31st Jul 2012, 09:29
  #5 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Belfast
Age: 33
Posts: 98
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks for the help Phil, and note i am trying read all background before asking questions
akafrank07 is offline  
Old 31st Jul 2012, 13:51
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: White Waltham, Prestwick & Calgary
Age: 72
Posts: 4,154
Likes: 0
Received 29 Likes on 14 Posts
We don't mind! That's what schools are for!

Phil
paco is offline  
Old 31st Jul 2012, 17:14
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: NC, USA
Age: 80
Posts: 92
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
speed stability

What has been stated above is true for both jet & prop airplanes at low speed where decreasing airspeed creates a greater drag rise than lift increase. It's known as the "back side of the power curve".

The difference in speed stability between jets & props is the effect of prop wash which varies the lift of the wing portion exposed to it, but most importantly varies the downward force created by the horizontal stabilizer.
This means that adding power tends to pitch the nose up, while decreasing power pitches nose down. In a well designed prop airplane the airspeed will remain very close to the trim speed with varying power settings mainly affecting vertical speed. On jets with engines mounted on/in the fuselage, power changes mainly affect airspeed with little pitch change.

The exceptions to this are low-wing jet aircraft with under-wing mounted engines like most large transports today. The low thrust line (below the cg) creates a pitching moment with thrust changes very similar to prop aircraft.

Pusher props and/or canards are different.
BobM2 is offline  
Old 1st Aug 2012, 11:24
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: England
Posts: 661
Received 20 Likes on 13 Posts
The jet aircrafts speed stability is much poorer than that of a propeller driven aircraft because of the following reason;

Thrust changes with speed, which helps to improve the speed stability on propeller-driven aircraft and does not improve it on jet aircraft
To understand the above comments in the original post we need to look at the thrust curves for jets and props.

For conventional turbojets (with no bypass or low bypass) the thrust is a maximum when airspeed is zero, then reduces as speed increases from zero up to about 250 knots. Thrust then increases again due to ram effect as speed continues to increase. If you think about it this thrust curve looks pretty much like a standard drag curve (allbeit with less pronounced slopes).

This means that throughout much of the speed range, as aircraft speed changes the thrust changes in the same sense as the drag. So if Vmd is in the region of 250 knots then below Vmd if speed increases, the decreasing drag is matched to some extent by the reducing thrust. And if speed increases above Vmd the increasing drag is matched to some extent by the increasing thrust. The overall effect is a reduction in speed stability.


For a propeller aircraft the thrust is maximum when airspeed is zero, then thrust gradually decreases with increasing airspeed. The airspeed never gets high enough for ram effect to be a major factor.

This means that as airspeed increases above Vmd, the drag increases while the thrust decreases. This makes the aircraft more speed stable above Vmd.

Last edited by keith williams; 1st Aug 2012 at 14:34.
keith williams is offline  
Old 1st Aug 2012, 22:46
  #9 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Belfast
Age: 33
Posts: 98
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks very much for your help Keith, very well explained indeed
akafrank07 is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.