Wikiposts
Search
Professional Pilot Training (includes ground studies) A forum for those on the steep path to that coveted professional licence. Whether studying for the written exams, training for the flight tests or building experience here's where you can hang out.

Definition - Light aircraft 5700kg

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 18th May 2012, 05:28
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Sofia
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Definition - Light aircraft 5700kg

Dear All,

I am trying to find definition of light airctaft. Based on ICAO it is below 7000kg but I am wondering where it comes from the definition that light/small aircraft is below 5700 kg MTOW? Any idea which document is the bases of this ... finally where it comes from 5700kg which number is in a lot of documents?

Thank you in advance.

Last edited by crosspoint; 18th May 2012 at 05:37.
crosspoint is offline  
Old 18th May 2012, 05:43
  #2 (permalink)  
Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 14,232
Received 50 Likes on 26 Posts
As good a place as any to look would be FAR-23, which says:-

Sec. 23.3 Airplane categories.

(a) The normal category is limited to airplanes that have a seating
configuration, excluding pilot seats, of nine or less, a maximum
certificated takeoff weight of 12,500 pounds or less, and intended for
nonacrobatic operation. Nonacrobatic operation includes:
(1) Any maneuver incident to normal flying;
(2) Stalls (except whip stalls); and
(3) Lazy eights, chandelles, and steep turns, in which the angle of
bank is not more than 60 degrees.
(b) The utility category is limited to airplanes that have a seating
configuration, excluding pilot seats, of nine or less, a maximum
certificated takeoff weight of 12,500 pounds or less, and intended for
limited acrobatic operation. Airplanes certificated in the utility
category may be used in any of the operations covered under paragraph
(a) of this section and in limited acrobatic operations. Limited
acrobatic operation includes:
(1) Spins (if approved for the particular type of airplane); and
(2) Lazy eights, chandelles, and steep turns, or similar maneuvers,
in which the angle of bank is more than 60 degrees but not more than 90
degrees.
(c) The acrobatic category is limited to airplanes that have a
seating configuration, excluding pilot seats, of nine or less, a maximum
certificated takeoff weight of 12,500 pounds or less, and intended for
use without restrictions, other than those shown to be necessary as a
result of required flight tests.
(d) The commuter category is limited to propeller-driven,
multiengine airplanes that have a seating configuration, excluding pilot
seats, of 19 or less, and a maximum certificated takeoff weight of
19,000 pounds or less. The commuter category operation is limited to any
maneuver incident to normal flying, stalls (except whip stalls), and
steep turns, in which the angle of bank is not more than 60 degrees.
(e) Except for commuter category, airplanes may be type certificated
in more than one category if the requirements of each requested category
are met.
12,500lb = 5,670 kg, which is the actual figure but it regularly gets rounded informally to 5,700kg.

The actual value is fairly arbitrary, it was the point at which some committee back in the 1950s decided to separate "light" from "large" aeroplanes when they were drafting in the USA FAR-23 and FAR-25, and in Britain BCAR Section K and BCAR Section D. I guess that this was down to a survey of the current and projected aircraft types at that time.

CS.23, the European standard words it slightly differently:

CS 23.1 Applicability
(a) This airworthiness code is applicable to –
(1) Aeroplanes in the normal, utility
and aerobatic categories that have a seating
configuration, excluding the pilot seat(s), of
nine or fewer and a maximum certificated takeoff
weight of 5670 kg (12 500 lb) or less; and
(2) Propellerdriven
twinengined
aeroplanes in the commuter category that have a
seating configuration, excluding the pilot
seat(s), of nineteen or fewer and a maximum
certificated takeoff
weight of 8618 kg (19 000
lb) or less
But basically says the same thing.

Do note that for some piston-twins the figure isn't 5,670kg, it's 8,618kg.

G
Genghis the Engineer is offline  
Old 18th May 2012, 05:48
  #3 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Sofia
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
CS23

Can you provide me a link for CS23 to find the tezt quoted by you. Thanks.

Any other documents where is specific writtent that airctraft below 5700kg is a light airctraft?

Last edited by crosspoint; 18th May 2012 at 05:51.
crosspoint is offline  
Old 18th May 2012, 05:51
  #4 (permalink)  
Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 14,232
Received 50 Likes on 26 Posts
Yep, its on my hard drive in the directory called "Design Codes".

Or you could try here

G
Genghis the Engineer is offline  
Old 18th May 2012, 05:53
  #5 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Sofia
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks. I found the text. However I need explicit text where is said that light aircraft is below 5700 kg ... any ideas?
crosspoint is offline  
Old 18th May 2012, 06:25
  #6 (permalink)  
Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 14,232
Received 50 Likes on 26 Posts
That's it - CS.23 is the certification standard for light aeroplanes in Europe, FAR-23 is the certification standard for light aeroplanes in the USA.

G
Genghis the Engineer is offline  
Old 19th May 2012, 07:49
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 10,815
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Just give up with him.

He has been told about 4444 doc for wake vortex speration and has had design codes given to him with defintions and its never expicit enough.

BTW the light/small thing is a UK only wake vortex cat and as such is only an ATC thing.

By the sounds of it he wants to stick a LET410 up a low level heli/light aircraft only VFR route. As the LET410 only cruises at something like 140-150 knots it will depend how much traffic use these routes if its sensible or not.

Last edited by mad_jock; 19th May 2012 at 07:55.
mad_jock is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.